OBJECTIVES: To describe barriers to recovery at home for vulnerable older adults after leaving the hospital. DESIGN: Standard qualitative research techniques, including purposeful sampling of participants according to age, sex, race, and English proficiency, were used to ensure a wide breadth of experiences. All participants were interviewed in their native language (English, Spanish, or Chinese). Two investigators independently coded interviews using the constant comparative method. The entire research team, with diverse backgrounds in primary care, hospital medicine, geriatrics, and nursing, performed thematic analysis. SETTING: Urban public safety-net teaching hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Vulnerable older adults (low income and health literacy, limited English proficiency) enrolled in a larger discharge interventional study. MEASUREMENTS: Qualitative data (participant quotations) were organized into themes. RESULTS: Twenty-four individuals with a mean age of 63 (range 55-84), 66% male, 67% nonwhite, 16% Spanish speaking, 16% Chinese speaking were interviewed. An overarching theme of "missing pieces" was identified in the plan for postdischarge recovery at home, from which three specific subthemes emerged: functional limitations and difficulty with mobility and self-care tasks, social isolation and lack of support from family and friends, and challenges from poverty and the built environment at home. In contrast, participants described mostly supportive experiences with traditional focuses of transition, care such as following prescribed medication and diet regimens. CONCLUSION: Hospital-based discharge interventions that focus on traditional aspects of care may overlook social and functional gaps in postdischarge care at home for vulnerable older adults. Postdischarge interventions that address these challenges may be necessary to reduce readmissions in this population.
OBJECTIVES: To describe barriers to recovery at home for vulnerable older adults after leaving the hospital. DESIGN: Standard qualitative research techniques, including purposeful sampling of participants according to age, sex, race, and English proficiency, were used to ensure a wide breadth of experiences. All participants were interviewed in their native language (English, Spanish, or Chinese). Two investigators independently coded interviews using the constant comparative method. The entire research team, with diverse backgrounds in primary care, hospital medicine, geriatrics, and nursing, performed thematic analysis. SETTING: Urban public safety-net teaching hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Vulnerable older adults (low income and health literacy, limited English proficiency) enrolled in a larger discharge interventional study. MEASUREMENTS: Qualitative data (participant quotations) were organized into themes. RESULTS: Twenty-four individuals with a mean age of 63 (range 55-84), 66% male, 67% nonwhite, 16% Spanish speaking, 16% Chinese speaking were interviewed. An overarching theme of "missing pieces" was identified in the plan for postdischarge recovery at home, from which three specific subthemes emerged: functional limitations and difficulty with mobility and self-care tasks, social isolation and lack of support from family and friends, and challenges from poverty and the built environment at home. In contrast, participants described mostly supportive experiences with traditional focuses of transition, care such as following prescribed medication and diet regimens. CONCLUSION: Hospital-based discharge interventions that focus on traditional aspects of care may overlook social and functional gaps in postdischarge care at home for vulnerable older adults. Postdischarge interventions that address these challenges may be necessary to reduce readmissions in this population.
Authors: Eric A Coleman; Jodi D Smith; Janet C Frank; Sung-Joon Min; Carla Parry; Andrew M Kramer Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2004-11 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Brian W Jack; Veerappa K Chetty; David Anthony; Jeffrey L Greenwald; Gail M Sanchez; Anna E Johnson; Shaula R Forsythe; Julie K O'Donnell; Michael K Paasche-Orlow; Christopher Manasseh; Stephen Martin; Larry Culpepper Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2009-02-03 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Shreya Kangovi; Frances K Barg; Tamala Carter; Kathryn Levy; Jeffrey Sellman; Judith A Long; David Grande Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2013-08-06 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Jason R Falvey; Robert E Burke; Daniel Malone; Kyle J Ridgeway; Beth M McManus; Jennifer E Stevens-Lapsley Journal: Phys Ther Date: 2016-03-03
Authors: Andrew Finkel Beck; Lauren G Solan; Stephanie A Brunswick; Hadley Sauers-Ford; Jeffrey M Simmons; Samir Shah; Jennifer Gold; Susan N Sherman Journal: BMJ Qual Saf Date: 2016-07-28 Impact factor: 7.035
Authors: Daniela C Gonçalves-Bradley; Natasha A Lannin; Lindy M Clemson; Ian D Cameron; Sasha Shepperd Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2016-01-27