Literature DB >> 24934363

Serum biomarkers for assessing histology and outcomes in patients with metastatic lung cancer.

Emil Lou1, Melissa Johnson2, Camelia Sima3, Rita Gonzalez-Espinoza4, Martin Fleisher4, Mark G Kris5, Christopher G Azzoli6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Serum biomarkers are not in routine clinical use for diagnosis, prognosis, or treatment selection in lung cancer.
OBJECTIVE: We examined serum protein biomarkers from patients with metastatic lung cancer to determine whether they correlate with progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), or histologic subtype.
METHODS: Serum samples were collected prior to chemotherapy from 153 patients with metastatic lung cancer treated at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center. Serum biomarkers were selected for ELISA testing based on their availability in a CLIA-certified clinical laboratory: ProGRP, SCC-Ag, NSE, CYFRA 21-1, TIMP1, and HE4. Pretreatment biomarker levels were correlated with outcome using proportional hazards analysis and tumor histology using logistic regression analysis.
RESULTS: Univariate analysis indicated that only higher levels of CYFRA 21-1 were significantly associated with worsened PFS (HR 1.3, 95% CI 1.1--1.5, p< 0.01) and OS (HR 1.4, 95% CI 1.2-1.7, p< 0.001). Multivariate analysis of NSE, CYFRA 21-1, and TIMP1 indicated that CYFRA 21-1 remained independently associated with lower OS (HR 1.3, 95% CI 1.1-1.6, p< 0.01). Univariate analysis indicated that ProGRP (OR 3.3, 95% CI 1.7-6.5, p< 0.001) and NSE (OR 4.8, 95% CI 2.6-8.8, p< 0.0001) had the highest probabilities of differentiating SCLC from NSCLC. Multivariate analysis of these two markers demonstrated that they predicted SCLC histology with 94% accuracy. Univariate analysis showed that only SCCL-Ag distinguished squamous cell histology from adenocarcinoma (OR 4.4, 95% CI 1.7-11.5, p< 0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: Serum CYFRA 21-1 may be useful in predicting patient survival, and serum ProGRP, NSE 21-1, and SCCL-Ag may be helpful in distinguishing between lung cancer sub-types.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CYFRA 21-1; Lung cancer; SCCL-Ag; biomarker panel; biomarkers

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24934363     DOI: 10.3233/CBM-140399

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Biomark        ISSN: 1574-0153            Impact factor:   4.388


  10 in total

1.  Human epididymis protein 4 may not be a reliable screening biomarker for detecting lung carcinoma patients.

Authors:  Betul Celik; Tangul Bulut
Journal:  Biomed Rep       Date:  2017-08-25

2.  Carbohydrate antigen 19-9 is a useful prognostic marker in esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Ryuma Tokunaga; Yu Imamura; Kenichi Nakamura; Tomoyuki Uchihara; Takatsugu Ishimoto; Shigeki Nakagawa; Masaaki Iwatsuki; Yoshifumi Baba; Yasuo Sakamoto; Yuji Miyamoto; Naoya Yoshida; Shinichiro Oyama; Takashi Shono; Hideaki Naoe; Hiroshi Saeki; Eiji Oki; Masayuki Watanabe; Yutaka Sasaki; Yoshihiko Maehara; Hideo Baba
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2015-08-26       Impact factor: 4.452

3.  Single nucleotide polymorphisms within the Wnt pathway predict the risk of bone metastasis in patients with non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Yiquan Xu; Hongru Li; Lihong Weng; Yanqin Qiu; Junqiong Zheng; Huaqiang He; Dongmei Zheng; Junfan Pan; Fan Wu; Yusheng Chen
Journal:  Aging (Albany NY)       Date:  2020-05-26       Impact factor: 5.682

4.  Prognostic values of HE4 expression in patients with cancer: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Cong Dai; Yi Zheng; Yuanjie Li; Tian Tian; Meng Wang; Peng Xu; Yujiao Deng; Qian Hao; Ying Wu; Zhen Zhai; Zhijun Dai; Jun Lyu
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2018-10-10       Impact factor: 3.989

5.  The Prognostic Value of Biomarkers on Detecting Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer in a Chinese Elderly Population.

Authors:  Lianghua Guo; Bin Song; Jianhong Xiao; Hui Lin; Junhua Chen; Xianghua Su
Journal:  Int J Gen Med       Date:  2021-09-07

Review 6.  Smart 3D Printed Hydrogel Skin Wound Bandages: A Review.

Authors:  Filmon Tsegay; Mohamed Elsherif; Haider Butt
Journal:  Polymers (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-03       Impact factor: 4.329

7.  Serum Biomarkers Associated with Clinical Outcomes Fail to Predict Brain Metastases in Patients with Stage IV Non-Small Cell Lung Cancers.

Authors:  Bob T Li; Emil Lou; Meier Hsu; Helena A Yu; Jarushka Naidoo; Marjorie G Zauderer; Camelia Sima; Melissa L Johnson; Mariza Daras; Lisa M DeAngelis; Martin Fleisher; Mark G Kris; Christopher G Azzoli
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-01-05       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Comparison of HE4, CA125, and ROMA Diagnostic Accuracy: A Prospective and Multicenter Study for Chinese Women With Epithelial Ovarian Cancer.

Authors:  Pengjun Zhang; Chuanxin Wang; Liming Cheng; Peng Zhang; Lin Guo; Wanli Liu; Zhongying Zhang; Yanchun Huang; Qishui Ou; Xinyu Wen; Yaping Tian
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 1.817

Review 9.  Beyond the Biomarker: Understanding the Diverse Roles of Human Epididymis Protein 4 in the Pathogenesis of Epithelial Ovarian Cancer.

Authors:  Nicole E James; Clinton Chichester; Jennifer R Ribeiro
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2018-04-24       Impact factor: 6.244

10.  Identifying the Best Marker Combination in CEA, CA125, CY211, NSE, and SCC for Lung Cancer Screening by Combining ROC Curve and Logistic Regression Analyses: Is It Feasible?

Authors:  Qixian Yang; Ping Zhang; Rongqiang Wu; Kefeng Lu; Hongxing Zhou
Journal:  Dis Markers       Date:  2018-10-01       Impact factor: 3.434

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.