Literature DB >> 24933819

Habitat connectivity shapes urban arthropod communities: the key role of green roofs.

S Braaker, J Ghazoul, M K Obrist, M Moretti.   

Abstract

The installation of green roofs, defined here as rooftops with a shallow soil cover and extensive vegetation, has been proposed as a possible measure to mitigate the loss of green space caused by the steady growth of cities. However, the effectiveness of green roofs in supporting arthropod communities, and the extent to which they facilitate connectivity of these communities within the urban environment is currently largely unknown. We investigated the variation of species community composition (beta diversity) of four arthropod groups with contrasting mobility (Carabidae, Araneae, Curculionidae, and Apidae) on 40 green roofs and 40 extensively managed green sites on the ground in the city of Zurich, Switzerland. With redundancy analysis and variation partitioning, we (1) disentangled the relative importance of local environmental conditions, the surrounding land cover composition, and habitat connectivity on species community composition, (2) searched for specific spatial scales of habitat connectivity for the different arthropod groups, and (3) discussed the ecological and functional value of green roofs in cities. Our study revealed that on green roofs community composition of high-mobility arthropod groups (bees and weevils) were mainly shaped by habitat connectivity, while low-mobility arthropod groups (carabids and spiders) were more influenced by local environmental conditions. A similar but less pronounced pattern was found for ground communities. The high importance of habitat connectivity in shaping high-mobility species community composition indicates that these green roof communities are substantially connected by the frequent exchange of individuals among surrounding green roofs. On the other hand, low-mobility species communities on green roofs are more likely connected to ground sites than to other green roofs. The integration of green roofs in urban spatial planning strategies has great potential to enable higher connectivity among green spaces, so that eventually even communities of low-mobility species become connected. Furthermore, improving the design of green roofs (composition and configuration of vegetation and soil types) could enhance the ecological value, particularly for low-mobility species.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24933819     DOI: 10.1890/13-0705.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecology        ISSN: 0012-9658            Impact factor:   5.499


  6 in total

1.  Neighborhood Landscape Spatial Patterns and Land Surface Temperature: An Empirical Study on Single-Family Residential Areas in Austin, Texas.

Authors:  Jun-Hyun Kim; Donghwan Gu; Wonmin Sohn; Sung-Ho Kil; Hwanyong Kim; Dong-Kun Lee
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2016-09-02       Impact factor: 3.390

2.  Urban green roofs provide habitat for migrating and breeding birds and their arthropod prey.

Authors:  Dustin R Partridge; J Alan Clark
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-08-29       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Fine-scale substrate heterogeneity in green roof plant communities: The constraint of size.

Authors:  Amiel Vasl; Bracha Y Schindler; Gyongyver J Kadas; Leon Blaustein
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2019-09-30       Impact factor: 2.912

4.  Urban meadows as an alternative to short mown grassland: effects of composition and height on biodiversity.

Authors:  Briony A Norton; Gary D Bending; Rachel Clark; Ron Corstanje; Nigel Dunnett; Karl L Evans; Darren R Grafius; Emily Gravestock; Samuel M Grice; Jim A Harris; Sally Hilton; Helen Hoyle; Edward Lim; Theresa G Mercer; Mark Pawlett; Oliver L Pescott; J Paul Richards; Georgina E Southon; Philip H Warren
Journal:  Ecol Appl       Date:  2019-07-22       Impact factor: 4.657

5.  Impervious surface and local abiotic conditions influence arthropod communities within urban greenspaces.

Authors:  Garrett M Maher; Graham A Johnson; Justin D Burdine
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2022-01-24       Impact factor: 2.984

6.  Estimating the potential biodiversity impact of redeveloping small urban spaces: the Natural History Museum's grounds.

Authors:  Helen R P Phillips; Sandra Knapp; Andy Purvis
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2017-10-30       Impact factor: 2.984

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.