Literature DB >> 24933725

Evaluation of two cane instruments in older adults with knee osteoarthritis.

Nancy Harada1, Stephanie Fong, Constance Heiney, Jennifer M Yentes, Karen L Perell-Gerson, Meika A Fang.   

Abstract

The objectives of this study were to describe the psychometric properties of the Cane Cognitive Mediator Scale (CCMS) and the Psychosocial Impact of Assistive Devices Scale (PIADS) in adults with knee osteoarthritis (OA) and to determine the feasibility of applying these instruments as screening tools to identify patients with the propensity to use a cane. Data from a randomized crossover trial were analyzed for 53 older adults with knee OA. Perceptions on using a cane were measured at baseline using the CCMS and PIADS. The CCMS was repeated 1 wk later. At 6 mo, subjects rated their intention to use a cane. The findings indicated that 1 wk test-retest reliability was acceptable for the CCMS Attitudes and Subjective Norms subscales (r = 0.48 to 0.93) and low for the CCMS Perceived Behavioral Control subscale (r = 0.15). Internal consistency reliability was good for each CCMS and PIADS subscale. The CCMS Subjective Norms subscale demonstrated acceptable predictive validity across all subgroups (r = 0.53 to 0.88). The PIADS Adaptability subscale demonstrated acceptable predictive validity for the 45 to 64 yr-old age group (r = 0.54). The findings indicate that the CCMS Subjective Norms subscale exhibits good psychometric properties and has potential application as a screening tool.

Entities:  

Keywords:  assistive device; cane use; knee; older adults; osteoarthritis; psychosocial; rehabilitation; reliability; screening; validity

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24933725     DOI: 10.1682/JRRD.2013.06.0140

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Rehabil Res Dev        ISSN: 0748-7711


  2 in total

1.  Linking the Psychosocial Impact of Assistive Devices Scale (PIADS) to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health.

Authors:  S Traversoni; J Jutai; C Fundarò; S Salvini; R Casale; A Giardini
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2018-08-21       Impact factor: 4.147

2.  Flow. A Socially Responsible 3D Printed One-Handed Recorder.

Authors:  Javier Esclapés; Almudena Gómez; Ana Ibañez
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-11-20       Impact factor: 3.390

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.