Literature DB >> 24932880

Association between sugar-sweetened and artificially sweetened soft drinks and type 2 diabetes: systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of prospective studies.

D C Greenwood1, D E Threapleton2, C E L Evans2, C L Cleghorn2, C Nykjaer2, C Woodhead2, V J Burley2.   

Abstract

The intake of sugar-sweetened soft drinks has been reported to be associated with an increased risk of type 2 diabetes, but it is unclear whether this is because of the sugar content or related lifestyle factors, whether similar associations hold for artificially sweetened soft drinks, and how these associations are related to BMI. We aimed to conduct a systematic literature review and dose-response meta-analysis of evidence from prospective cohorts to explore these issues. We searched multiple sources for prospective studies on sugar-sweetened and artificially sweetened soft drinks in relation to the risk of type 2 diabetes. Data were extracted from eleven publications on nine cohorts. Consumption values were converted to ml/d, permitting the exploration of linear and non-linear dose-response trends. Summary relative risks (RR) were estimated using a random-effects meta-analysis. The summary RR for sugar-sweetened and artificially sweetened soft drinks were 1·20/330 ml per d (95 % CI 1·12, 1·29, P< 0·001) and 1·13/330 ml per d (95 % CI 1·02, 1·25, P= 0·02), respectively. The association with sugar-sweetened soft drinks was slightly lower in studies adjusting for BMI, consistent with BMI being involved in the causal pathway. There was no evidence of effect modification, though both these comparisons lacked power. Overall between-study heterogeneity was high. The included studies were observational, so their results should be interpreted cautiously, but findings indicate a positive association between sugar-sweetened soft drink intake and type 2 diabetes risk, attenuated by adjustment for BMI. The trend was less consistent for artificially sweetened soft drinks. This may indicate an alternative explanation, such as lifestyle factors or reverse causality. Future research should focus on the temporal nature of the association and whether BMI modifies or mediates the association.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24932880     DOI: 10.1017/S0007114514001329

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Nutr        ISSN: 0007-1145            Impact factor:   3.718


  89 in total

Review 1.  Impact of soft drinks to health and economy: a critical review.

Authors:  J F Tahmassebi; A BaniHani
Journal:  Eur Arch Paediatr Dent       Date:  2019-06-08

2.  Perspective: Public Health Nutrition Policies Should Focus on Healthy Eating, Not on Calorie Counting, Even to Decrease Obesity.

Authors:  Ana C Fernandes; Débora K Rieger; Rossana P C Proença
Journal:  Adv Nutr       Date:  2019-07-01       Impact factor: 8.701

Review 3.  Nonnutritive sweeteners and cardiometabolic health: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and prospective cohort studies.

Authors:  Meghan B Azad; Ahmed M Abou-Setta; Bhupendrasinh F Chauhan; Rasheda Rabbani; Justin Lys; Leslie Copstein; Amrinder Mann; Maya M Jeyaraman; Ashleigh E Reid; Michelle Fiander; Dylan S MacKay; Jon McGavock; Brandy Wicklow; Ryan Zarychanski
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2017-07-17       Impact factor: 8.262

4.  Lifestyle recommendations for the prevention and management of metabolic syndrome: an international panel recommendation.

Authors:  Pablo Pérez-Martínez; Dimitri P Mikhailidis; Vasilios G Athyros; Mónica Bullo; Patrick Couture; María I Covas; Lawrence de Koning; Javier Delgado-Lista; Andrés Díaz-López; Christian A Drevon; Ramón Estruch; Katherine Esposito; Montserrat Fitó; Marta Garaulet; Dario Giugliano; Antonio García-Ríos; Niki Katsiki; Genovefa Kolovou; Benoît Lamarche; Maria Ida Maiorino; Guillermo Mena-Sánchez; Araceli Muñoz-Garach; Dragana Nikolic; José M Ordovás; Francisco Pérez-Jiménez; Manfredi Rizzo; Jordi Salas-Salvadó; Helmut Schröder; Francisco J Tinahones; Rafael de la Torre; Ben van Ommen; Suzan Wopereis; Emilio Ros; José López-Miranda
Journal:  Nutr Rev       Date:  2017-05-01       Impact factor: 7.110

5.  Adequate and excessive food consumption in Suriname: a multiethnic middle-income country.

Authors:  Lenny M W Nahar-van Venrooij; Esha Marhe; Christel Antonius-Smits; Ingrid S Krishnadath
Journal:  Int J Public Health       Date:  2018-08-04       Impact factor: 3.380

Review 6.  Japanese Clinical Practice Guideline for Diabetes 2016.

Authors:  Masakazu Haneda; Mitsuhiko Noda; Hideki Origasa; Hiroshi Noto; Daisuke Yabe; Yukihiro Fujita; Atsushi Goto; Tatsuya Kondo; Eiichi Araki
Journal:  Diabetol Int       Date:  2018-03-27

7.  Sugar-Sweetened and Artificially Sweetened Beverages in Relation to Stroke and Dementia: Are Soft Drinks Hard on the Brain?

Authors:  Heike Wersching; Hannah Gardener; Ralph L Sacco
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 7.914

8.  Short-Term Consumption of Sucralose with, but Not without, Carbohydrate Impairs Neural and Metabolic Sensitivity to Sugar in Humans.

Authors:  Jelle R Dalenberg; Barkha P Patel; Raphael Denis; Maria G Veldhuizen; Yuko Nakamura; Petra C Vinke; Serge Luquet; Dana M Small
Journal:  Cell Metab       Date:  2020-03-03       Impact factor: 27.287

9.  Cumulative intake of artificially sweetened and sugar-sweetened beverages and risk of incident type 2 diabetes in young adults: the Coronary Artery Risk Development In Young Adults (CARDIA) Study.

Authors:  Kristin M Hirahatake; David R Jacobs; James M Shikany; Luohua Jiang; Nathan D Wong; Lyn M Steffen; Andrew O Odegaard
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2019-09-01       Impact factor: 7.045

10.  Lack of in-home piped water and reported consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages among adults in rural Alaska.

Authors:  Emily Mosites; Sara Seeman; Andrea Fenaughty; Karol Fink; Laura Eichelberger; Peter Holck; Timothy K Thomas; Michael G Bruce; Thomas W Hennessy
Journal:  Public Health Nutr       Date:  2019-09-24       Impact factor: 4.022

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.