Literature DB >> 24932853

Reducing unnecessary preoperative blood orders and costs by implementing an updated institution-specific maximum surgical blood order schedule and a remote electronic blood release system.

Steven M Frank1, Michael J Oleyar, Paul M Ness, Aaron A R Tobian.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Using blood utilization data acquired from the anesthesia information management system, an updated institution-specific maximum surgical blood order schedule was introduced. The authors evaluated whether the maximum surgical blood order schedule, along with a remote electronic blood release system, reduced unnecessary preoperative blood orders and costs.
METHODS: At a large academic medical center, data for preoperative blood orders were analyzed for 63,916 surgical patients over a 34-month period. The new maximum surgical blood order schedule and the electronic blood release system (Hemosafe; Haemonetics Corp., Braintree, MA) were introduced mid-way through this time period. The authors assessed whether these interventions led to reductions in unnecessary preoperative orders and associated costs.
RESULTS: Among patients having surgical procedures deemed not to require a type and screen or crossmatch (n = 33,216), the percent of procedures with preoperative blood orders decreased by 38% (from 40.4% [7,167 of 17,740 patients] to 25.0% [3,869 of 15,476 patients], P < 0.001). Among all hospitalized inpatients, the crossmatch-to-transfusion ratio decreased by 27% (from 2.11 to 1.54; P < 0.001) over the same time period. The proportion of patients who required emergency release uncrossmatched blood increased from 2.2 to 3.1 per 1,000 patients (P = 0.03); however, most of these patients were having emergency surgery. Based on the realized reductions in blood orders, annual costs were reduced by $137,223 ($6.08 per patient) for surgical patients, and by $298,966 ($6.20/patient) for all hospitalized patients.
CONCLUSION: Implementing institution-specific, updated maximum surgical blood order schedule-directed preoperative blood ordering guidelines along with an electronic blood release system results in a substantial reduction in unnecessary orders and costs, with a clinically insignificant increase in requirement for emergency release blood transfusions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24932853      PMCID: PMC4165815          DOI: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000000338

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesthesiology        ISSN: 0003-3022            Impact factor:   7.892


  30 in total

1.  Developing performance measures for patient blood management.

Authors:  Harriet M Gammon; Jonathan H Waters; Ann Watt; Jerod M Loeb; Alessandra Donini-Lenhoff
Journal:  Transfusion       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 3.157

2.  National health expenditure projections: modest annual growth until coverage expands and economic growth accelerates.

Authors:  Sean P Keehan; Gigi A Cuckler; Andrea M Sisko; Andrew J Madison; Sheila D Smith; Joseph M Lizonitz; John A Poisal; Christian J Wolfe
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2012-06-12       Impact factor: 6.301

3.  Risk of hemolytic transfusion reactions following emergency-release RBC transfusion.

Authors:  Pamela P Goodell; Lynne Uhl; Monique Mohammed; Amy A Powers
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 2.493

4.  Variability in blood and blood component utilization as assessed by an anesthesia information management system.

Authors:  Steven M Frank; Will J Savage; Jim A Rothschild; Richard J Rivers; Paul M Ness; Sharon L Paul; John A Ulatowski
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 7.892

5.  Clinical practice guideline: red blood cell transfusion in adult trauma and critical care.

Authors:  Lena M Napolitano; Stanley Kurek; Fred A Luchette; Gary L Anderson; Michael R Bard; William Bromberg; William C Chiu; Mark D Cipolle; Keith D Clancy; Lawrence Diebel; William S Hoff; K Michael Hughes; Imtiaz Munshi; Donna Nayduch; Rovinder Sandhu; Jay A Yelon; Howard L Corwin; Philip S Barie; Samuel A Tisherman; Paul C Hebert
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  2009-12

6.  The costs of transfusion: economic evaluations in transfusion medicine, Part 1.

Authors:  Seema Kacker; Kevin D Frick; Aaron A R Tobian
Journal:  Transfusion       Date:  2013-04-08       Impact factor: 3.157

7.  Incomplete pretransfusion testing leads to surgical delays.

Authors:  Brian McWilliams; Mark H Yazer; James Cramer; Darrell J Triulzi; Jonathan H Waters
Journal:  Transfusion       Date:  2012-02-20       Impact factor: 3.157

8.  Computerized bar code-based blood identification systems and near-miss transfusion episodes and transfusion errors.

Authors:  Gregory A Nuttall; John P Abenstein; James R Stubbs; Paula Santrach; Mark H Ereth; Pamela M Johnson; Emily Douglas; William C Oliver
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 7.616

Review 9.  Red blood cell transfusion: a clinical practice guideline from the AABB*.

Authors:  Jeffrey L Carson; Brenda J Grossman; Steven Kleinman; Alan T Tinmouth; Marisa B Marques; Mark K Fung; John B Holcomb; Orieji Illoh; Lewis J Kaplan; Louis M Katz; Sunil V Rao; John D Roback; Aryeh Shander; Aaron A R Tobian; Robert Weinstein; Lisa Grace Swinton McLaughlin; Benjamin Djulbegovic
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2012-07-03       Impact factor: 25.391

10.  Optimizing preoperative blood ordering with data acquired from an anesthesia information management system.

Authors:  Steven M Frank; James A Rothschild; Courtney G Masear; Richard J Rivers; William T Merritt; Will J Savage; Paul M Ness
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 7.892

View more
  12 in total

1.  A preoperative risk score for transfusion in infrarenal endovascular aneurysm repair to avoid type and cross.

Authors:  Thomas F X O'Donnell; Katie E Shean; Sarah E Deery; Thomas C F Bodewes; Mark C Wyers; Kerry L O'Brien; Robina Matyal; Marc L Schermerhorn
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2017-07-26       Impact factor: 4.268

2.  Longer average blood storage duration is associated with increased risk of infection and overall morbidity following radical cystectomy.

Authors:  Meera R Chappidi; Heather J Chalfin; Daniel J Johnson; Max Kates; Nikolai A Sopko; Michael H Johnson; Jen-Jane Liu; Steven M Frank; Trinity J Bivalacqua
Journal:  Urol Oncol       Date:  2016-10-19       Impact factor: 3.498

3.  Cost-Effectiveness of Routine Type and Screens in Select Endonasal Skull Base Surgeries.

Authors:  Aviv Spillinger; Meredith Allen; Patrick Karabon; Houmehr Hojjat; Kerolos Shenouda; Inaya Hajj Hussein; Jeffrey T Jacob; Peter F Svider; Adam J Folbe
Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base       Date:  2021-05-31

4.  Personalized Surgical Transfusion Risk Prediction Using Machine Learning to Guide Preoperative Type and Screen Orders.

Authors:  Sunny S Lou; Hanyang Liu; Chenyang Lu; Troy S Wildes; Bruce L Hall; Thomas Kannampallil
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2022-07-01       Impact factor: 8.986

5.  A Prospective Single Centre Study of Preoperative Blood Ordering Versus Actual Usage Among Patients Undergoing Elective Curative Oncological Resections in a Tertiary Care Hospital in India.

Authors:  Mohammed Basheeruddin Inamdar; Narendra Hulikal; Manilal Banoth; Venkatrami Reddy; Sreedhar Babu Kinnera Vijay; Hanumanthu Rao Mangu
Journal:  Indian J Surg Oncol       Date:  2021-05-29

6.  Reducing unnecessary crossmatching for hip fracture patients by accounting for preoperative hemoglobin concentration.

Authors:  Raj M Amin; Varun Puvanesarajah; Yash P Chaudhry; Matthew J Best; Sandesh S Rao; Steven M Frank; Erik A Hasenboehler
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2021-05-18

7.  Evaluation of the use of blood in surgeries as a tool to change patterns for requesting blood product reserves.

Authors:  Sibia Soraya Marcondes; Antônio Roberto Carrareto; Maria da Penha Zago-Gomes; Maria do Perpétuo Socorro Vendramini Orletti; Anisia Carla Zucoloto Loureiro Novaes
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2019-04-25       Impact factor: 2.365

8.  Development and validation of a machine learning method to predict intraoperative red blood cell transfusions in cardiothoracic surgery.

Authors:  Zheng Wang; Shandian Zhe; Joshua Zimmerman; Candice Morrisey; Joseph E Tonna; Vikas Sharma; Ryan A Metcalf
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-01-25       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Prediction of perioperative transfusions using an artificial neural network.

Authors:  Steven Walczak; Vic Velanovich
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-02-24       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Examining the Utility and Cost of Routine Type and Screen Prior to Minimally Invasive Hysterectomy.

Authors:  Anne Tjaden; Nicolette Codispoti; Linda C Yang; Thythy Pham
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2021 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.172

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.