Literature DB >> 24932647

Does field reliability for Static-99 scores decrease as scores increase?

Amanda K Rice1, Marcus T Boccaccini1, Paige B Harris1, Samuel W Hawes2.   

Abstract

This study examined the field reliability of Static-99 (Hanson & Thornton, 2000) scores among 21,983 sex offenders and focused on whether rater agreement decreased as scores increased. As expected, agreement was lowest for high-scoring offenders. Initial and most recent Static-99 scores were identical for only about 40% of offenders who had been assigned a score of 6 during their initial evaluations, but for more than 60% of offenders who had been assigned a score of 2 or lower. In addition, the size of the difference between scores increased as scores increased, with pairs of scores differing by 2 or more points for about 30% of offenders scoring in the high-risk range. Because evaluators and systems use high Static-99 scores to identify sexual offenders who may require intensive supervision or even postrelease civil commitment, it is important to recognize that there may be more measurement error for high scores than low scores and to consider adopting procedures for minimizing or accounting for measurement error. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2014 APA, all rights reserved). (c) 2014 APA, all rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24932647      PMCID: PMC4332525          DOI: 10.1037/pas0000009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Assess        ISSN: 1040-3590


  10 in total

1.  Improving risk assessments for sex offenders: a comparison of three actuarial scales.

Authors:  R K Hanson; D Thornton
Journal:  Law Hum Behav       Date:  2000-02

Review 2.  Regression to the mean: what it is and how to deal with it.

Authors:  Adrian G Barnett; Jolieke C van der Pols; Annette J Dobson
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2004-08-27       Impact factor: 7.196

3.  Evaluation of the SORAG and the Static-99 on Belgian sex offenders committed to a forensic facility.

Authors:  C Ducro; T Pham
Journal:  Sex Abuse       Date:  2006-01

4.  The accuracy of recidivism risk assessments for sexual offenders: a meta-analysis of 118 prediction studies.

Authors:  R Karl Hanson; Kelly E Morton-Bourgon
Journal:  Psychol Assess       Date:  2009-03

5.  Reliability of risk assessment measures used in sexually violent predator proceedings.

Authors:  Cailey S Miller; Eva R Kimonis; Randy K Otto; Suzonne M Kline; Adam L Wasserman
Journal:  Psychol Assess       Date:  2012-05-07

6.  An examination of the interrater reliability between practitioners and researchers on the static-99.

Authors:  Stephen P Quesada; Cynthia Calkins; Elizabeth L Jeglic
Journal:  Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol       Date:  2013-07-16

7.  Are forensic experts biased by the side that retained them?

Authors:  Daniel C Murrie; Marcus T Boccaccini; Lucy A Guarnera; Katrina A Rufino
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2013-08-22

8.  Field reliability of the Psychopathy Checklist-Revised among life sentenced prisoners in Sweden.

Authors:  Joakim Sturup; John F Edens; Karolina Sörman; Daniel Karlberg; Björn Fredriksson; Marianne Kristiansson
Journal:  Law Hum Behav       Date:  2013-10-14

9.  Improving the predictive accuracy of Static-99 and Static-2002 with older sex offenders: revised age weights.

Authors:  Leslie Helmus; David Thornton; R Karl Hanson; Kelly M Babchishin
Journal:  Sex Abuse       Date:  2011-08-15

10.  Regression toward the mean: its etiology, diagnosis, and treatment.

Authors:  D L Streiner
Journal:  Can J Psychiatry       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 4.356

  10 in total
  1 in total

1.  A Static-99R Validation Study on Individuals With Mental Disorders: 5 to 20 Years of Fixed Follow-Up After Sexual Offenses.

Authors:  Christian Baudin; Thomas Nilsson; Joakim Sturup; Märta Wallinius; Peter Andiné
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2021-02-02
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.