Literature DB >> 2493212

Specialized testing after recent acute myocardial infarction.

R F DeBusk1.   

Abstract

A wide variety of specialized laboratory tests have been used to characterize prognosis and functional capacity soon after a patient has an acute myocardial infarction. Few attempts have been made to integrate the available data on these tests into clinically relevant guidelines for the clinician. This review evaluates the use of these tests, alone and in combination, throughout the course of recovery from acute myocardial infarction. The primary objective of these tests is to quantify myocardial ischemia and left ventricular dysfunction, the pathophysiologic basis of prognosis and functional capacity. The selection of one test over another depends on whether either test provides information on myocardial ischemia and left ventricular dysfunction not available through the standard clinical evaluation, and the risk, quality, and cost associated with each test. The stepwise application of specialized testing after acute myocardial infarction enables the identification of three groups of patients: approximately 20% at very high risk, due primarily to irreversible left ventricular dysfunction; approximately 30% at moderately high risk, due primarily to myocardial ischemia; and approximately 50% at low risk who are free of significant left ventricular dysfunction or myocardial ischemia. Accurate discrimination among these three groups enables the application of aggressive medical and surgical therapy to patients at moderate to high risk and accelerated recovery for patients at low risk. Specialized testing also helps to guide subsequent management after thrombolysis and revascularization procedures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2493212     DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-110-6-470

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-4819            Impact factor:   25.391


  6 in total

1.  Why is cardiac rehabilitation not widely used?

Authors:  R F De Busk
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1992-02

2.  Predicting severe ischemic events after uncomplicated myocardial infarction by exercise testing and rest and exercise radionuclide ventriculography.

Authors:  G Mazzotta; A Camerini; G Scopinarô; G Villavecchiâ; R Lionetto; C Vecchio
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  1994 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.952

3.  Detection of significant residual stenosis of the infarct-related artery after thrombolysis by high-dose dipyridamole echocardiography test: is it detected often enough?

Authors:  A N Nesković; M Bojić; A D Popović
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 2.882

Review 4.  Report of the Canadian Cardiovascular Society's consensus conference on the Management of the Postmyocardial Infarction Patient.

Authors:  E L Fallen; P Armstrong; J Cairns; W Dafoe; N Frasure-Smith; A Langer; D Massel; N Oldridge; D Peretz; G J Tremblay
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1991-04-15       Impact factor: 8.262

5.  Dipyridamole thallium-201 scintigraphy for early risk stratification of patients after uncomplicated myocardial infarction.

Authors:  J Hung; M Moshiri; G N Groom; A A Van der Schaaf; R W Parsons; M E Hands
Journal:  Heart       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 6.  Cardiac rehabilitation. Current status and future directions.

Authors:  H Gattiker; P Goins; C Dennis
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1992-02
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.