Literature DB >> 24931138

Coverage of protein domain families with structural protein-protein interactions: current progress and future trends.

Alexander Goncearenco1, Benjamin A Shoemaker1, Dachuan Zhang1, Alexey Sarychev1, Anna R Panchenko2.   

Abstract

Protein interactions have evolved into highly precise and regulated networks adding an immense layer of complexity to cellular systems. The most accurate atomistic description of protein binding sites can be obtained directly from structures of protein complexes. The availability of structurally characterized protein interfaces significantly improves our understanding of interactomes, and the progress in structural characterization of protein-protein interactions (PPIs) can be measured by calculating the structural coverage of protein domain families. We analyze the coverage of protein domain families (defined according to CDD and Pfam databases) by structures, structural protein-protein complexes and unique protein binding sites. Structural PPI coverage of currently available protein families is about 30% without any signs of saturation in coverage growth dynamics. Given the current growth rates of domain databases and structural PPI deposition, complete domain coverage with PPIs is not expected in the near future. As a result of this study we identify families without any protein-protein interaction evidence (listed on a supporting website http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Structure/ibis/coverage/) and propose them as potential targets for structural studies with a focus on protein interactions. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Coverage of protein families; PPI; Protein binding sites; Protein–protein interactions; Structural genomics

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24931138      PMCID: PMC4250425          DOI: 10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2014.05.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prog Biophys Mol Biol        ISSN: 0079-6107            Impact factor:   3.667


  40 in total

1.  The Protein Data Bank.

Authors:  H M Berman; J Westbrook; Z Feng; G Gilliland; T N Bhat; H Weissig; I N Shindyalov; P E Bourne
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2000-01-01       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  A new, structurally nonredundant, diverse data set of protein-protein interfaces and its implications.

Authors:  Ozlem Keskin; Chung-Jung Tsai; Haim Wolfson; Ruth Nussinov
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 6.725

3.  ProtBuD: a database of biological unit structures of protein families and superfamilies.

Authors:  Qifang Xu; Adrian Canutescu; Zoran Obradovic; Roland L Dunbrack
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2006-10-02       Impact factor: 6.937

Review 4.  Data deposition and annotation at the worldwide protein data bank.

Authors:  Shuchismita Dutta; Kyle Burkhardt; Jasmine Young; Ganesh J Swaminathan; Takanori Matsuura; Kim Henrick; Haruki Nakamura; Helen M Berman
Journal:  Mol Biotechnol       Date:  2008-12-10       Impact factor: 2.695

5.  Predicting protein-protein interactions on a proteome scale by matching evolutionary and structural similarities at interfaces using PRISM.

Authors:  Nurcan Tuncbag; Attila Gursoy; Ruth Nussinov; Ozlem Keskin
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2011-08-11       Impact factor: 13.491

6.  Phosphorylation in protein-protein binding: effect on stability and function.

Authors:  Hafumi Nishi; Kosuke Hashimoto; Anna R Panchenko
Journal:  Structure       Date:  2011-12-07       Impact factor: 5.006

7.  IBIS (Inferred Biomolecular Interaction Server) reports, predicts and integrates multiple types of conserved interactions for proteins.

Authors:  Benjamin A Shoemaker; Dachuan Zhang; Manoj Tyagi; Ratna R Thangudu; Jessica H Fong; Aron Marchler-Bauer; Stephen H Bryant; Thomas Madej; Anna R Panchenko
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2011-11-18       Impact factor: 16.971

8.  The Protein Structure Initiative: achievements and visions for the future.

Authors:  Gaetano T Montelione
Journal:  F1000 Biol Rep       Date:  2012-04-02

9.  CDD: conserved domains and protein three-dimensional structure.

Authors:  Aron Marchler-Bauer; Chanjuan Zheng; Farideh Chitsaz; Myra K Derbyshire; Lewis Y Geer; Renata C Geer; Noreen R Gonzales; Marc Gwadz; David I Hurwitz; Christopher J Lanczycki; Fu Lu; Shennan Lu; Gabriele H Marchler; James S Song; Narmada Thanki; Roxanne A Yamashita; Dachuan Zhang; Stephen H Bryant
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2012-11-28       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  Functional site plasticity in domain superfamilies.

Authors:  Benoit H Dessailly; Natalie L Dawson; Kenji Mizuguchi; Christine A Orengo
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  2013-03-14
View more
  5 in total

1.  Exploring Protein-Protein Interactions as Drug Targets for Anti-cancer Therapy with In Silico Workflows.

Authors:  Alexander Goncearenco; Minghui Li; Franco L Simonetti; Benjamin A Shoemaker; Anna R Panchenko
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2017

2.  Structural Perspectives on the Evolutionary Expansion of Unique Protein-Protein Binding Sites.

Authors:  Alexander Goncearenco; Alexey K Shaytan; Benjamin A Shoemaker; Anna R Panchenko
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2015-07-23       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 3.  The Methods Employed in Mass Spectrometric Analysis of Posttranslational Modifications (PTMs) and Protein-Protein Interactions (PPIs).

Authors:  Rama R Yakubu; Edward Nieves; Louis M Weiss
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2019       Impact factor: 2.622

4.  Algorithmic approaches to protein-protein interaction site prediction.

Authors:  Tristan T Aumentado-Armstrong; Bogdan Istrate; Robert A Murgita
Journal:  Algorithms Mol Biol       Date:  2015-02-15       Impact factor: 1.405

Review 5.  Computational Approaches to Prioritize Cancer Driver Missense Mutations.

Authors:  Feiyang Zhao; Lei Zheng; Alexander Goncearenco; Anna R Panchenko; Minghui Li
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2018-07-20       Impact factor: 5.923

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.