Literature DB >> 24931129

Comparison of time to PRRSv-stability and production losses between two exposure programs to control PRRSv in sow herds.

D C L Linhares1, J P Cano2, M Torremorell3, R B Morrison3.   

Abstract

To control and eliminate porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSv) from breeding herds, some veterinarians adopt a strategy called load-close-expose which consists of interrupting replacement pig introduction for several months and exposing the pigs to a replicating PRRSv. This was a prospective quasi-experiment that followed 61 breeding herds acutely infected with PRRSv that adopted one of two exposure programs: modified-live virus (MLV) vaccine or live-resident virus inoculation (LVI). Treatment groups (load-close-expose with MLV or LVI) were compared for: (a) time-to-PRRSv stability (TTS), defined as time in weeks it took to produce PRRSv negative pigs at weaning; (b) the time-to-baseline production (TTBP), defined using statistical process control methods to represent time to recover to the number of pigs weaned per week that herds had prior to PRRSv-detection; and (c) the total production loss in terms of number of pigs weaned per week. TTS and TTBP were compared between treatments using survival analysis. Day 1 of the program was considered to be the day that treatment was administered. Sampling at herds consisted of bleeding 30 due-to-wean piglets on a monthly basis. Serum was tested for PRRSv RNA by RT-PCR. Herds in which PRRSv was not detected over a 90-day period were classified as reaching stability. Multivariate analysis using proportional hazards regression was performed adjusting the effect of treatment on TTBP and TTS to 'severity of PRRSv infection', 'number of whole-herd exposures', 'days from PRRSv-detection to intervention', 'prior PRRSv-infection status' and 'veterinary clinic associated with the herd'. Total loss was compared between groups using multivariate regression analysis adjusted by selected covariates. The median TTS among participating herds was 26.6 weeks (25th to 75th percentile, 21.6-33.0 weeks). The overall TTBP was 16.5 weeks (range 0-29 weeks). The magnitude of production losses following whole-herd exposure averaged 2217 pigs not weaned/1000 sows and was correlated with TTBP. Herds in the MLV group recovered production sooner and had less total loss than herds in the LVI group. TTBP and TTS were significantly shorter and the total loss was significantly less in herds assisted by a specific veterinary clinic and herds that were infected with PRRSv in the 3 years prior to the study. This study provided new metrics to assist veterinarians to decide between methods of exposure to control and eliminate PRRSv from breeding herds.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Control; EWMA; Elimination; Live virus inoculation; Load-close-expose; Modified-live virus vaccine; PRRSv; Pigs; SPC

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24931129     DOI: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2014.05.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prev Vet Med        ISSN: 0167-5877            Impact factor:   2.670


  22 in total

1.  Elimination of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus infection using an inactivated vaccine in combination with a roll-over method in a Hungarian large-scale pig herd.

Authors:  Attila Pertich; Zoltán Barna; Orsolya Makai; János Farkas; Tamás Molnár; Ádám Bálint; István Szabó; Mihály Albert
Journal:  Acta Vet Scand       Date:  2022-05-07       Impact factor: 2.048

2.  Evaluation of Control Strategies for Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome (PRRS) in Swine Breeding Herds Using a Discrete Event Agent-Based Model.

Authors:  Andréia Gonçalves Arruda; Robert Friendship; Jane Carpenter; Amy Greer; Zvonimir Poljak
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-11-22       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  OptisampleTM: Open web-based application to optimize sampling strategies for active surveillance activities at the herd level illustrated using Porcine Respiratory Reproductive Syndrome (PRRS).

Authors:  Anna Alba; Robert E Morrison; Ann Cheeran; Albert Rovira; Julio Alvarez; Andres M Perez
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-07-18       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Evaluation of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome stabilization protocols in 23 French Farrow-to-finish farms located in a high-density swine area.

Authors:  Pauline Berton; Valérie Normand; Guy-Pierre Martineau; Franck Bouchet; Arnaud Lebret; Agnès Waret-Szkuta
Journal:  Porcine Health Manag       Date:  2017-05-23

Review 5.  A Review of Quantitative Tools Used to Assess the Epidemiology of Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome in U.S. Swine Farms Using Dr. Morrison's Swine Health Monitoring Program Data.

Authors:  Carles Vilalta; Andreia G Arruda; Steven J P Tousignant; Pablo Valdes-Donoso; Petra Muellner; Ulrich Muellner; Moh A Alkhamis; Robert B Morrison; Andres M Perez
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2017-06-27

6.  Development of a stochastic agent-based model to evaluate surveillance strategies for detection of emergent porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome strains.

Authors:  A G Arruda; Z Poljak; D Knowles; A McLean
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2017-06-12       Impact factor: 2.741

Review 7.  Novel analytic tools for the study of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSv) in endemic settings: lessons learned in the U.S.

Authors:  Julio Alvarez; Pablo Valdes-Donoso; Steven Tousignant; Mohammad Alkhamis; Robert Morrison; Andres Perez
Journal:  Porcine Health Manag       Date:  2016-01-21

8.  Whole Genome or Single Genes? A Phylodynamic and Bibliometric Analysis of PRRSV.

Authors:  Alba Frias-De-Diego; Manuel Jara; Brittany M Pecoraro; Elisa Crisci
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2021-06-24

9.  Economic Analysis of Immunization Strategies for PRRS Control [corrected].

Authors:  Daniel C L Linhares; Clayton Johnson; Robert B Morrison
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-12-16       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Immunity raised by recent European subtype 1 PRRSV strains allows better replication of East European subtype 3 PRRSV strain Lena than that raised by an older strain.

Authors:  Ivan Trus; Ilias S Frydas; Vishwanatha R A P Reddy; Caroline Bonckaert; Yewei Li; Lise K Kvisgaard; Lars E Larsen; Hans J Nauwynck
Journal:  Vet Res       Date:  2016-01-08       Impact factor: 3.683

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.