| Literature DB >> 24931109 |
L Bar-On1, K Desloovere1, G Molenaers2, J Harlaar3, T Kindt4, E Aertbeliën5.
Abstract
Clinical assessment of spasticity is compromised by the difficulty to distinguish neural from non-neural components of increased joint torque. Quantifying the contributions of each of these components is crucial to optimize the selection of anti-spasticity treatments such as botulinum toxin (BTX). The aim of this study was to compare different biomechanical parameters that quantify the neural contribution to ankle joint torque measured during manually-applied passive stretches to the gastrocsoleus in children with spastic cerebral palsy (CP). The gastrocsoleus of 53 children with CP (10.9 ± 3.7 y; females n = 14; bilateral/unilateral involvement n = 28/25; Gross Motor Functional Classification Score I-IV) and 10 age-matched typically developing (TD) children were assessed using a manually-applied, instrumented spasticity assessment. Joint angle characteristics, root mean square electromyography and joint torque were simultaneously recorded during passive stretches at increasing velocities. From the CP cohort, 10 muscles were re-assessed for between-session reliability and 19 muscles were re-assessed 6 weeks post-BTX. A parameter related to mechanical work, containing both neural and non-neural components, was compared to newly developed parameters that were based on the modeling of passive stiffness and viscosity. The difference between modeled and measured response provided a quantification of the neural component. Both types of parameters were reliable (ICC > 0.95) and distinguished TD from spastic muscles (p < 0.001). However, only the newly developed parameters significantly decreased post-BTX (p = 0.012). Identifying the neural and non-neural contributions to increased joint torque allows for the development of individually tailored tone management.Entities:
Keywords: Botulinum toxin-A; Cerebral palsy; Hypertonia; Muscle modeling; Spasticity; Torque
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24931109 DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2014.04.207
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Gait Posture ISSN: 0966-6362 Impact factor: 2.840