Literature DB >> 24929550

Simultaneous quantitative determination of microcystin-LR and its glutathione metabolites in rat liver by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry.

Xiaochun Guo1, Ping Xie2, Jun Chen3, Xun Tuo4, Xuwei Deng4, Shangchun Li4, Dezhao Yu4, Cheng Zeng5.   

Abstract

The roles of glutathione (GSH) and cysteine (Cys) in the detoxification of Microcystin-LR (MC-LR) have recently become a popular area of research. However, lacking analysis methods for MC-LR-GSH and MC-LR-Cys (two main GSH pathway metabolites) in mammals, elucidation of the detoxification mechanism and metabolic pathway of MC-LR in mammals is difficult. In this study, a novel method for the simultaneous quantitative analysis of MC-LR, MC-LR-GSH and MC-LR-Cys in rat liver was developed and validated. The analytes were simultaneously extracted from rat liver using 3M sodium chloride solution containing 0.01M EDTA-Na2-5% acetic acid, followed by solid-phase extraction (SPE) on Oasis HLB and silica cartridges and determination by liquid chromatography-electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (LC-ESI-MS/MS). Under the optimized pretreatment conditions and instrument parameters, good recoveries of MC-LR, MC-LR-GSH and MC-LR-Cys were obtained at three concentrations (0.2, 1.0 and 2.5 μg g(-1) dry weight (DW)) with values ranging from 97.7 ± 4.2 to 98.7 ± 5.1%, 70.1 ± 4.8 to 71.1 ± 4.1% and 79.8 ± 3.5 to 81.4 ± 4.0%, respectively. The relative standard deviations (RSDs) of these compounds at 0.2, 1.0 and 2.5 μg g(-1) DW were between 4.3% and 6.9%. The limits of detection (LODs) were 0.005, 0.007 and 0.006 μg g(-1) DW and the limits of quantification (LOQs) were 0.017, 0.023 and 0.020 μg g(-1) DW for MC-LR, MC-LR-GSH and MC-LR-Cys, respectively. Furthermore, this method was successfully applied to both time- and dosage-effect studies of MC-LR, MC-LR-GSH and MC-LR-Cys in vivo.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  LC–ESI–MS/MS; Microcystin-LR; Microcystin-LR-Cys; Microcystin-LR-GSH; Quantitative determination; Rat liver

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24929550     DOI: 10.1016/j.jchromb.2014.05.046

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci        ISSN: 1570-0232            Impact factor:   3.205


  5 in total

1.  Optimization of extraction methods for quantification of microcystin-LR and microcystin-RR in fish, vegetable, and soil matrices using UPLC-MS/MS.

Authors:  Manjunath Manubolu; Jiyoung Lee; Kenneth M Riedl; Zi Xun Kua; Lindsay P Collart; Stuart A Ludsin
Journal:  Harmful Algae       Date:  2018-05-16       Impact factor: 4.273

2.  Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease alters microcystin-LR toxicokinetics and acute toxicity.

Authors:  John D Clarke; Anika Dzierlenga; Tarana Arman; Erica Toth; Hui Li; Katherine D Lynch; Dan-Dan Tian; Michael Goedken; Mary F Paine; Nathan Cherrington
Journal:  Toxicon       Date:  2019-03-05       Impact factor: 3.033

3.  Quantitatively evaluating detoxification of the hepatotoxic microcystin-LR through the glutathione (GSH) pathway in SD rats.

Authors:  Xiaochun Guo; Liang Chen; Jun Chen; Ping Xie; Shangchun Li; Jun He; Wei Li; Huihui Fan; Dezhao Yu; Cheng Zeng
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2015-10-21       Impact factor: 4.223

4.  Development and Application of Extraction Methods for LC-MS Quantification of Microcystins in Liver Tissue.

Authors:  David Baliu-Rodriguez; Daria Kucheriavaia; Dilrukshika S W Palagama; Apurva Lad; Grace M O'Neill; Johnna A Birbeck; David J Kennedy; Steven T Haller; Judy A Westrick; Dragan Isailovic
Journal:  Toxins (Basel)       Date:  2020-04-19       Impact factor: 4.546

5.  Toward Revealing Microcystin Distribution in Mouse Liver Tissue Using MALDI-MS Imaging.

Authors:  Daria Kucheriavaia; Dušan Veličković; Nicholas Peraino; Apurva Lad; David J Kennedy; Steven T Haller; Judy A Westrick; Dragan Isailovic
Journal:  Toxins (Basel)       Date:  2021-10-08       Impact factor: 4.546

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.