Literature DB >> 24928709

Self-reported pigmentary phenotypes and race are significant but incomplete predictors of Fitzpatrick skin phototype in an ethnically diverse population.

Steven Y He1, Charles E McCulloch2, W John Boscardin3, Mary-Margaret Chren1, Eleni Linos1, Sarah T Arron4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Fitzpatrick skin phototype (FSPT) is the most common method used to assess sunburn risk and is an independent predictor of skin cancer risk. Because of a conventional assumption that FSPT is predictable based on pigmentary phenotypes, physicians frequently estimate FSPT based on patient appearance.
OBJECTIVE: We sought to determine the degree to which self-reported race and pigmentary phenotypes are predictive of FSPT in a large, ethnically diverse population.
METHODS: A cross-sectional survey collected responses from 3386 individuals regarding self-reported FSPT, pigmentary phenotypes, race, age, and sex. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to determine variables that significantly predict FSPT.
RESULTS: Race, sex, skin color, eye color, and hair color are significant but weak independent predictors of FSPT (P<.0001). A multivariate model constructed using all independent predictors of FSPT only accurately predicted FSPT to within 1 point on the Fitzpatrick scale with 92% accuracy (weighted kappa statistic 0.53). LIMITATIONS: Our study enriched for responses from ethnic minorities and does not fully represent the demographics of the US population.
CONCLUSIONS: Patient self-reported race and pigmentary phenotypes are inaccurate predictors of sun sensitivity as defined by FSPT. There are limitations to using patient-reported race and appearance in predicting individual sunburn risk.
Copyright © 2014 American Academy of Dermatology, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Fitzpatrick skin phototype; Fitzpatrick skin type; eye color; hair color; pigmentary phenotype; predictor; race; skin cancer risk; skin color; sunburn risk; suntan

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24928709      PMCID: PMC4165764          DOI: 10.1016/j.jaad.2014.05.023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Acad Dermatol        ISSN: 0190-9622            Impact factor:   11.527


  23 in total

Review 1.  Ethnic skin disorders overview.

Authors:  Rebat M Halder; Pavan K Nootheti
Journal:  J Am Acad Dermatol       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 11.527

2.  Relationship between constitutive skin color and ultraviolet light sensitivity in Koreans.

Authors:  J H Lee; T Y Kim
Journal:  Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 3.135

3.  Assessment of sun sensitivity by questionnaire: validity of items and formulation of a prediction rule.

Authors:  M A Weinstock
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 6.437

4.  Phenotypic characters related to skin type and minimal erythemal dose.

Authors:  L Andreassi; S Simoni; P Fiorini; M Fimiani
Journal:  Photodermatol       Date:  1987-02

5.  Skin type, hair color, and freckles are predictors of decreased minimal erythema ultraviolet radiation dose.

Authors:  E Azizi; A Lusky; A P Kushelevsky; M Schewach-Millet
Journal:  J Am Acad Dermatol       Date:  1988-07       Impact factor: 11.527

6.  The validity and practicality of sun-reactive skin types I through VI.

Authors:  T B Fitzpatrick
Journal:  Arch Dermatol       Date:  1988-06

7.  Skin type, minimal erythema dose (MED), and sunlight acclimatization.

Authors:  R M Sayre; D L Desrochers; C J Wilson; E Marlowe
Journal:  J Am Acad Dermatol       Date:  1981-10       Impact factor: 11.527

8.  Skin typing for assessment of skin cancer risk and acute response to UV-B and oral methoxsalen photochemotherapy.

Authors:  R S Stern; K Momtaz
Journal:  Arch Dermatol       Date:  1984-07

9.  Responses of black and white skin to solar-simulating radiation: differences in DNA photodamage, infiltrating neutrophils, proteolytic enzymes induced, keratinocyte activation, and IL-10 expression.

Authors:  Feiko Rijken; Piet L B Bruijnzeel; Huib van Weelden; Rebecca C M Kiekens
Journal:  J Invest Dermatol       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 8.551

10.  Fitzpatrick skin phototype is an independent predictor of squamous cell carcinoma risk after solid organ transplantation.

Authors:  Ravinder Gogia; Maxwell Binstock; Ryutaro Hirose; W John Boscardin; Mary-Margaret Chren; Sarah T Arron
Journal:  J Am Acad Dermatol       Date:  2012-10-26       Impact factor: 11.527

View more
  13 in total

1.  Are the Fitzpatrick Skin Phototypes Valid for Cancer Risk Assessment in a Racially and Ethnically Diverse Sample of Women?

Authors:  Marilyn S Sommers; Jamison D Fargo; Yadira Regueira; Kathleen M Brown; Barbara L Beacham; Angela R Perfetti; Janine S Everett; David J Margolis
Journal:  Ethn Dis       Date:  2019-07-18       Impact factor: 1.847

2.  Skin Cancer in People of Color: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  George A Zakhem; Akshay N Pulavarty; Jenna C Lester; Mary L Stevenson
Journal:  Am J Clin Dermatol       Date:  2021-12-13       Impact factor: 7.403

3.  Evaluating awareness of skin cancer in skin of color organ transplant recipients.

Authors:  Jennifer Wang; Samantha Lopez; Amanda M Treviño; Daniel Galvan; Joan Reisch; Rajiv I Nijhawan; Arturo R Dominguez
Journal:  Arch Dermatol Res       Date:  2022-07-23       Impact factor: 3.033

4.  Development of the selective micropulse individual retinal therapy depends on age and type on the Fitzpatrick scale.

Authors:  Elena V Ivanova; Pavel L Volodin
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-08-25       Impact factor: 3.535

5.  Images of dark skin in top emergency medicine journals: A cross-sectional analysis of images of emergent cutaneous disorders.

Authors:  Geovonni Bell; Sherita Holmes; Scott Gillespie; Anna Wood; Brittany L Murray
Journal:  AEM Educ Train       Date:  2021-09-29

6.  Risk Factors for Keratinocyte Carcinoma in Recipients of Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplants.

Authors:  Jeffrey F Scott; Kevin R Brough; Konstantin V Grigoryan; John G Muzic; Grace Y Kim; Rosalynn R Z Conic; Sheena T Hill; Jerry D Brewer; Christian L Baum; Mark R Litzow; William J Hogan; Mrinal S Patnaik; Shahrukh K Hashmi; Hillard M Lazarus; Jeremy S Bordeaux; Cheryl L Thompson; Meg R Gerstenblith; Julia S Lehman
Journal:  JAMA Dermatol       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 10.282

7.  Safety of light emitting diode-red light on human skin: Two randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Jared Jagdeo; Julie K Nguyen; Derek Ho; Erica B Wang; Evan Austin; Andrew Mamalis; Ramanjot Kaur; Ekaterina Kraeva; Joshua M Schulman; Chin-Shang Li; Samuel T Hwang; Ted Wun; Emanual Maverakis; R Rivkah Isseroff
Journal:  J Biophotonics       Date:  2019-12-08       Impact factor: 3.207

8.  Darker Skin Color Measured by Von Luschan Chromatic Scale and Increased Sunlight Exposure Time Are Independently Associated with Decreased Odds of Vitamin D Deficiency in Thai Ambulatory Patients.

Authors:  Nipith Charoenngam; Sutin Sriussadaporn
Journal:  J Nutr Metab       Date:  2021-02-28

9.  Estimation of individual cumulative ultraviolet exposure using a geographically-adjusted, openly-accessible tool.

Authors:  Gefei A Zhu; Inbar Raber; Sukolsak Sakshuwong; Shufeng Li; Angela S Li; Caroline Tan; Anne Lynn S Chang
Journal:  BMC Dermatol       Date:  2016-01-20

10.  Validity of the Fitzpatrick Skin Phototype Classification in Ecuador.

Authors:  Martha Fors; Paloma González; Carmen Viada; Kirsten Falcon; Santiago Palacios
Journal:  Adv Skin Wound Care       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 2.373

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.