Christopher Newby1, Joshua Agbetile2, Beverley Hargadon2, Will Monteiro2, Ruth Green2, Ian Pavord3, Christopher Brightling2, Salman Siddiqui4. 1. Department of Health Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom. 2. Department of Infection Immunity and Inflammation/Institute for Lung Health, University of Leicester/Glenfield Hospital, Leicester, United Kingdom. 3. Oxford University Hospitals, Oxford University, NDM Research Building, Oxford, United Kingdom. 4. Department of Infection Immunity and Inflammation/Institute for Lung Health, University of Leicester/Glenfield Hospital, Leicester, United Kingdom. Electronic address: salman95@yahoo.com.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Eosinophilic airway inflammation measured by using induced sputum is an important treatment stratification tool in patients with severe asthma. In addition, sputum eosinophilia has been shown to be associated with severe exacerbations and airflow limitation. OBJECTIVES: We sought to identify whether eosinophilic inflammation in sputum is associated with FEV₁ decrease in patients with severe asthma and whether we could identify subgroups of decrease behavior based on the variation of eosinophilic airway inflammation over time. METHODS: Ninety-seven patients with severe asthma from the Glenfield Asthma Cohort were followed up with scheduled 3-month visits; the median duration of follow-up and number of visits was 6 years (interquartile range, 5.6-7.6 years) and 2.7 visits per year. Induced sputum was analyzed for eosinophilic inflammation at scheduled visits. Linear mixed-effects models were used to identify variables associated with lung function and overall decrease. In addition, using individual patients' mean and SD sputum eosinophil percentages over time, a 2-step cluster analysis was performed to identify patient clusters with different rates of decrease. RESULTS: FEV₁ decrease was -25.7 mL/y in the overall population. Postbronchodilator FEV₁ was also dependent on exacerbations, age of onset, height, age, sex, and log10 sputum eosinophil percentages (P < .001). Three decrease patient clusters were identified: (1) noneosinophilic with low variation (mean decrease, -14.0 mL/y), (2) eosinophilic with high variation (mean decrease, -40.9 mL/y), and (3) hypereosinophilic with low variation (mean decrease in lung function, -19.2 mL/y). CONCLUSION: The amplitude of sputum eosinophilia was associated with postbronchodilator FEV₁ in asthmatic patients. In contrast, high variability rather than the amplitude at baseline or over time of sputum eosinophils was associated with accelerated FEV₁ decrease.
BACKGROUND:Eosinophilic airway inflammation measured by using induced sputum is an important treatment stratification tool in patients with severe asthma. In addition, sputum eosinophilia has been shown to be associated with severe exacerbations and airflow limitation. OBJECTIVES: We sought to identify whether eosinophilic inflammation in sputum is associated with FEV₁ decrease in patients with severe asthma and whether we could identify subgroups of decrease behavior based on the variation of eosinophilic airway inflammation over time. METHODS: Ninety-seven patients with severe asthma from the Glenfield Asthma Cohort were followed up with scheduled 3-month visits; the median duration of follow-up and number of visits was 6 years (interquartile range, 5.6-7.6 years) and 2.7 visits per year. Induced sputum was analyzed for eosinophilic inflammation at scheduled visits. Linear mixed-effects models were used to identify variables associated with lung function and overall decrease. In addition, using individual patients' mean and SD sputum eosinophil percentages over time, a 2-step cluster analysis was performed to identify patient clusters with different rates of decrease. RESULTS: FEV₁ decrease was -25.7 mL/y in the overall population. Postbronchodilator FEV₁ was also dependent on exacerbations, age of onset, height, age, sex, and log10 sputum eosinophil percentages (P < .001). Three decrease patient clusters were identified: (1) noneosinophilic with low variation (mean decrease, -14.0 mL/y), (2) eosinophilic with high variation (mean decrease, -40.9 mL/y), and (3) hypereosinophilic with low variation (mean decrease in lung function, -19.2 mL/y). CONCLUSION: The amplitude of sputum eosinophilia was associated with postbronchodilator FEV₁ in asthmatic patients. In contrast, high variability rather than the amplitude at baseline or over time of sputum eosinophils was associated with accelerated FEV₁ decrease.
Authors: Annette T Hastie; David T Mauger; Loren C Denlinger; Andrea Coverstone; Mario Castro; Serpil Erzurum; Nizar Jarjour; Bruce D Levy; Deborah A Meyers; Wendy C Moore; Brenda R Phillips; Sally E Wenzel; John V Fahy; Elliot Israel; Eugene R Bleecker Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2021-04-01 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Loren C Denlinger; Brenda R Phillips; Ronald L Sorkness; Eugene R Bleecker; Mario Castro; Mark D DeBoer; Anne M Fitzpatrick; Annette T Hastie; Jonathan M Gaffin; Wendy C Moore; Michael C Peters; Stephen P Peters; Wanda Phipatanakul; Juan Carlos Cardet; Serpil C Erzurum; John V Fahy; Merritt L Fajt; Benjamin Gaston; Bruce D Levy; Deborah A Meyers; Kristie Ross; W Gerald Teague; Sally E Wenzel; Prescott G Woodruff; Joe Zein; Nizar N Jarjour; David T Mauger; Elliot Israel Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2021-04-01 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Ga Young Ban; Su Chin Kim; Hyun Young Lee; Young Min Ye; Yoo Seob Shin; Hae Sim Park Journal: Allergy Asthma Immunol Res Date: 2021-05 Impact factor: 5.764
Authors: Alessandra Chiappori; Laura De Ferrari; Chiara Folli; Pierluigi Mauri; Anna Maria Riccio; Giorgio Walter Canonica Journal: Clin Mol Allergy Date: 2015-10-01