Literature DB >> 24928435

Do we know how much we put on the plate? Assessment of the accuracy of self-estimated versus weighed vegetables and whole grain portions using an Intelligent Buffet at the FoodScape Lab.

T R Nørnberg1, L Houlby1, L N Jørgensen1, C He1, F J A Pérez-Cueto2.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to assess the accuracy of self-estimated vegetable and whole grain serving sizes in a self-served buffet meal. The study took place in a laboratory setting where an Intelligent Buffet was used to register the exact weight of each food type that was self-served by each participant. The initial sample consisted of 58 participants recruited from Aalborg University in Copenhagen, of which 52 participants (59% male) provided complete estimates on the weight of whole grains and 49 participants (63% male) provided complete estimates on the weight of vegetable servings in their meal. The majority of the participants were students aged 20-29 years (85% for whole grain responses and 82% for vegetable responses). Significant differences between self-estimated and actual portion size estimates were observed for both vegetables and whole grains (P < 0.001). The mean self-estimated weight of a vegetable serving was 218(±134) g compared to the mean actual weight of 74(±44) g. The mean self-estimated and mean actual weights of a whole grain serving were 36(±34) g and 10(±9) g, respectively. There was no significant correlation between self-estimated and actual weights for each food group (P > 0.05). In conclusion, the participants' ability to accurately assess the serving size of vegetables and whole grains in a self-served meal did not correspond with the actual amount served. This may have implications for consumer interpretation of dietary recommendations used in nutrition interventions in Denmark.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  FoodScape Lab; Intelligent Buffet; Self-estimation; Serving size; Vegetables; Whole grain

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24928435     DOI: 10.1016/j.appet.2014.06.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appetite        ISSN: 0195-6663            Impact factor:   3.868


  10 in total

1.  A Comparison of Food Portion Size Estimation by Older Adults, Young Adults and Nutritionists.

Authors:  C M Timon; S E Cooper; M E Barker; A J Astell; T Adlam; F Hwang; E A Williams
Journal:  J Nutr Health Aging       Date:  2018       Impact factor: 4.075

2.  Eating behaviors, attitudes, and beliefs that contribute to overweight and obesity among women in Lilongwe City, Malawi: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Myness Kasanda Ndambo; Alinane Linda Nyondo-Mipando; Chrissie Thakwalakwa
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2022-06-09       Impact factor: 2.742

3.  Predictors of Change in Physical Activity and Fruit and Vegetable Intake in a Multiethnic Population in Hawaii at 6 and 12 Months Follow-up.

Authors:  Joy C Galloway; Claudio R Nigg; Min Liu; Jinan C Banna
Journal:  Int J Appl Psychol       Date:  2015

Review 4.  Analysis of energy metabolism in humans: A review of methodologies.

Authors:  Yan Y Lam; Eric Ravussin
Journal:  Mol Metab       Date:  2016-09-20       Impact factor: 7.422

5.  The "Smart Dining Table": Automatic Behavioral Tracking of a Meal with a Multi-Touch-Computer.

Authors:  Sean Manton; Greta Magerowski; Laura Patriarca; Miguel Alonso-Alonso
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-02-11

6.  Controlled testing of novel portion control plate produces smaller self-selected portion sizes compared to regular dinner plate.

Authors:  Joel W Hughes; Carly M Goldstein; Carly Logan; Jessica L Mulvany; Misty A W Hawkins; Amy F Sato; John Gunstad
Journal:  BMC Obes       Date:  2017-07-28

Review 7.  Portion Size: Latest Developments and Interventions.

Authors:  Ingrid Steenhuis; Maartje Poelman
Journal:  Curr Obes Rep       Date:  2017-03

8.  Visual perceptions of portion size normality and intended food consumption: A norm range model.

Authors:  Ashleigh Haynes; Charlotte A Hardman; Alexis D J Makin; Jason C G Halford; Susan A Jebb; Eric Robinson
Journal:  Food Qual Prefer       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 5.565

9.  Effect of Impulsivity Traits on Food Choice within a Nudging Intervention.

Authors:  Irene C F Marques; Megan Ting; Daniela Cedillo-Martínez; Federico J A Pérez-Cueto
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2020-05-14       Impact factor: 5.717

10.  Comparison of three nudge interventions (priming, default option, and perceived variety) to promote vegetable consumption in a self-service buffet setting.

Authors:  Rasmus Friis; Laurits Rohden Skov; Annemarie Olsen; Katherine Marie Appleton; Laure Saulais; Caterina Dinnella; Heather Hartwell; Laurence Depezay; Erminio Monteleone; Agnès Giboreau; Federico J A Perez-Cueto
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-05-31       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.