Literature DB >> 24928266

Fluoroquinolone resistant rectal colonization predicts risk of infectious complications after transrectal prostate biopsy.

Michael A Liss1, Stephen A Taylor2, Deepak Batura3, Deborah Steensels4, Methee Chayakulkeeree5, Charlotte Soenens4, G Gopal Rao3, Atreya Dash6, Samuel Park7, Nishant Patel7, Jason Woo7, Michelle McDonald7, Unwanaobong Nseyo7, Pooya Banapour7, Stephen Unterberg7, Thomas E Ahlering8, Hendrik Van Poppel4, Kyoko Sakamoto9, Joshua Fierer9, Peter C Black2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Infection after transrectal prostate biopsy has become an increasing concern due to fluoroquinolone resistant bacteria. We determined whether colonization identified by rectal culture can identify men at high risk for post-transrectal prostate biopsy infection.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Six institutions provided retrospective data through a standardized, web based data entry form on patients undergoing transrectal prostate biopsy who had rectal culture performed. The primary outcome was any post-transrectal prostate biopsy infection and the secondary outcome was hospital admission 30 days after transrectal prostate biopsy. We used chi-square and logistic regression statistical analysis.
RESULTS: A total of 2,673 men underwent rectal culture before transrectal prostate biopsy from January 1, 2007 to September 12, 2013. The prevalence of fluoroquinolone resistance was 20.5% (549 of 2,673). Fluoroquinolone resistant positive rectal cultures were associated with post-biopsy infection (6.6% vs 1.6%, p <0.001) and hospitalization (4.4% vs 0.9%, p <0.001). Fluoroquinolone resistant positive rectal culture increased the risk of infection (OR 3.98, 95% CI 2.37-6.71, p <0.001) and subsequent hospital admission (OR 4.77, 95% CI 2.50-9.10, p <0.001). If men only received fluoroquinolone prophylaxis, the infection and hospitalization proportion increased to 8.2% (28 of 343) and 6.1% (21 of 343), with OR 4.77 (95% CI 2.50-9.10, p <0.001) and 5.67 (95% CI 3.00-10.90, p <0.001), respectively. The most common fluoroquinolone resistant bacteria isolates were Escherichia coli (83.7%). Limitations include the retrospective study design, nonstandardized culture and interpretation of resistance methods.
CONCLUSIONS: Colonization of fluoroquinolone resistant organisms in the rectum identifies men at high risk for infection and subsequent hospitalization from prostate biopsy, especially in those with fluoroquinolone prophylaxis only.
Copyright © 2014 American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  biopsy; drug resistance; infection; microbial; prostate

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24928266     DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2014.06.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  24 in total

Review 1.  The emerging threat of multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria in urology.

Authors:  Hosam M Zowawi; Patrick N A Harris; Matthew J Roberts; Paul A Tambyah; Mark A Schembri; M Diletta Pezzani; Deborah A Williamson; David L Paterson
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2015-09-01       Impact factor: 14.432

2.  Infective complications in patients after transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy and the role of ciprofloxacin resistant Escherichia coli colonization in rectal flora.

Authors:  Mustafa Bilal Hamarat; Fatih Tarhan; Rahim Horuz; Gülfem Akengin Öcal; Mehmet Kutlu Demirkol; Alper Kafkaslı; Özgür Yazıcı
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2017-05-03

3.  An antimicrobial prophylaxis protocol using rectal swab cultures for transrectal prostate biopsy.

Authors:  Stephen J Summers; Darshan P Patel; Blake D Hamilton; Angela P Presson; Mark A Fisher; William T Lowrance; Andrew W Southwick
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2015-05-03       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 4.  Prostate MRI and transperineal TRUS/MRI fusion biopsy for prostate cancer detection: clinical practice updates.

Authors:  Eugenio Martorana; Giacomo Maria Pirola; Maria Cristina Aisa; Pietro Scialpi; Aldo Di Blasi; Giovanni Saredi; Alfredo D'Andrea; Stefano Signore; Riccardo Grisanti; Michele Scialpi
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2019-07-01

Review 5.  Antibacterial Prophylaxis for Surgical Site Infection in the Elderly: Practical Application.

Authors:  Maria Adriana Cataldo; Guido Granata; Nicola Petrosillo
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 3.923

6.  Performance Validation of Selective Screening Agars for Guiding Antimicrobial Prophylaxis in Patients Undergoing Prostate Biopsy.

Authors:  Sofie C M Tops; Marlie Bruens; Sacha van Mook-Vermulst; Diane Lamers-Jansen; Tobias Engel; Ger van den Brink; Rob van Duuren; Heiman F L Wertheim; Eva Kolwijck
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2018-08-27       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae in hospital urinary tract infections: incidence and antibiotic susceptibility profile over 9 years.

Authors:  Liam Toner; Nathan Papa; Sani H Aliyu; Harveer Dev; Nathan Lawrentschuk; Samih Al-Hayek
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2015-10-28       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 8.  Cutting to the Core of the Issue: Emerging Strategies To Reduce Prostate Biopsy-Related Infections.

Authors:  Robin R Chamberland
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2016-05-04       Impact factor: 5.948

9.  Planning for the post-antibiotic era - why we must avoid TRUS-guided biopsy sampling.

Authors:  Declan G Murphy; Jeremy P Grummet
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2016-09-20       Impact factor: 14.432

10.  Reducing Infectious Complications Following Transrectal Ultrasound-guided Prostate Biopsy: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Jordon T Walker; Nirmish Singla; Claus G Roehrborn
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2016
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.