Literature DB >> 24927945

Slope estimation and viewing distance of the observer.

Heiko Hecht1, Dennis Shaffer, Behrang Keshavarz, Mariagrace Flint.   

Abstract

The overestimation of geographical slant is one of the most sizable visual illusions. However, in some cases estimates of close-by slopes within the range of the observer's personal space have been found to be rather accurate. We propose that the seemingly diverse findings can be reconciled when taking the viewing distance of the observer into account. The latter involves the distance of the observer from the slope (personal space, action space, and vista space) and also the eye-point relative to the slope. We separated these factors and compared outdoor judgments to those collected with a three-dimensional (3D) model of natural terrain, which was within arm's reach of the observer. Slope was overestimated in the outdoors at viewing distances between 2 m and 138 m. The 3D model reproduced the errors in monocular viewing; however, performance was accurate with stereoscopic viewing. We conclude that accurate slant perception breaks down as soon as the situation exits personal space, be it physically or be it by closing one eye.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24927945     DOI: 10.3758/s13414-014-0702-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 1943-3921            Impact factor:   2.199


  2 in total

1.  Manual anchoring biases in slant estimation affect matches even for near surfaces.

Authors:  Dennis M Shaffer; Eric McManama; Frank H Durgin
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2015-12

2.  Rolling Motion Along an Incline: Visual Sensitivity to the Relation Between Acceleration and Slope.

Authors:  Francesca Ceccarelli; Barbara La Scaleia; Marta Russo; Benedetta Cesqui; Silvio Gravano; Maura Mezzetti; Alessandro Moscatelli; Andrea d'Avella; Francesco Lacquaniti; Myrka Zago
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2018-06-22       Impact factor: 4.677

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.