Literature DB >> 24927779

[Management and prevention of complications in open urethral surgery. End-to-end anastomosis and buccal mucosa urethroplasty].

A Kocot1, H Riedmiller.   

Abstract

Open operative procedures for urethral reconstruction (i.e. stricture resection with primary end-to-end anastomosis and buccal mucosa urethroplasty) are established and proven techniques with a low complication profile and high success rates. The aim of this operative technique is removal of the urethral obstruction to avoid far-reaching complications for the whole urinary tract. Despite excellent long-term results, complications are not completely avoidable in both techniques. A successful complication management requires the complete spectrum of reconstructive techniques in addition to appropriate operative expertise in order to be able to achieve the optimal result even in cases of complications. Simultaneously the recognition of potential risks contributes to a further reduction of early and delayed complications both in the approach to the operative intervention as well as intraoperatively.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24927779     DOI: 10.1007/s00120-014-3513-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urologe A        ISSN: 0340-2592            Impact factor:   0.639


  10 in total

1.  Substitution urethroplasty with buccal mucosal-free grafts.

Authors:  D E Andrich; A R Mundy
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 7.450

2.  Long-term results of surgery for urethral stricture: a statistical analysis.

Authors:  Thomas M Kessler; Friedhelm Schreiter; Georg Kralidis; Matthias Heitz; Roberto Olianas; Margit Fisch
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 7.450

3.  Long-term followup of bulbar end-to-end anastomosis: a retrospective analysis of 153 patients in a single center experience.

Authors:  Guido Barbagli; Michele De Angelis; Giuseppe Romano; Massimo Lazzeri
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2007-10-15       Impact factor: 7.450

4.  Dorsal free graft urethroplasty.

Authors:  G Barbagli; C Selli; A Tosto; E Palminteri
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 7.450

5.  Intraoral morbidity following free buccal mucosal graft harvesting for urethroplasty.

Authors:  L Tolstunov; M A Pogrel; J W McAninch
Journal:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod       Date:  1997-11

6.  Ventral onlay urethroplasty using buccal mucosa for complex stricture repair.

Authors:  Tobias Heinke; Elmar W Gerharz; Roland Bonfig; Hubertus Riedmiller
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 2.649

7.  Multivariate analysis of risk factors for long-term urethroplasty outcome.

Authors:  Benjamin N Breyer; Jack W McAninch; Jared M Whitson; Michael L Eisenberg; Jennifer F Mehdizadeh; Jeremy B Myers; Bryan B Voelzke
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2009-12-16       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  Muscle- and nerve-sparing bulbar urethroplasty: a new technique.

Authors:  Guido Barbagli; Stefano De Stefani; Filippo Annino; Cosimo De Carne; Giampaolo Bianchi
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2008-03-24       Impact factor: 20.096

9.  The morbidity of buccal mucosal graft harvest for urethroplasty and the effect of nonclosure of the graft harvest site on postoperative pain.

Authors:  D N Wood; S E Allen; D E Andrich; T J Greenwell; A R Mundy
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 10.  The oral mucosa graft: a systematic review.

Authors:  Michael R Markiewicz; Melissa A Lukose; Joseph E Margarone; Guido Barbagli; Kennon S Miller; Sung-Kiang Chuang
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2007-06-11       Impact factor: 7.450

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.