| Literature DB >> 24927423 |
Clara L Mackenzie1, Sharon A Lynch2, Sarah C Culloty2, Shelagh K Malham3.
Abstract
Increases in atmospheric carbon dioxide are leading to physical changes in marine environments including parallel decreases in ocean pH and increases in seawater temperature. This study examined the impacts of a six month exposure to combined decreased pH and increased temperature on the immune response and disease status in the blue mussel, Mytilus edulis L. Results provide the first confirmation that exposure to future acidification and warming conditions via aquarium-based simulation may have parallel implications for bivalve health. Collectively, the data suggests that temperature more than pH may be the key driver affecting immune response in M. edulis. Data also suggests that both increases in temperature and/or lowered pH conditions may lead to changes in parasite abundance and diversity, pathological conditions, and bacterial incidence in M. edulis. These results have implications for future management of shellfish under a predicted climate change scenario and future sustainability of shellfisheries. Examination of the combined effects of two stressors over an extended exposure period provides key preliminary data and thus, this work represents a unique and vital contribution to current research efforts towards a collective understanding of expected near-future impacts of climate change on marine environments.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24927423 PMCID: PMC4057270 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0099712
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Seawater carbonate chemistry values for experimental treatments.
| Treatment | T | Sal | TA | DIC | pHT | pCO2 | HCO3 − | CO3 −2 | Ωarag | Ωcalc |
| (°C) | (‰) | (µmol/kg) | (µmol/kg) | (µatm) | (µmol/kg) | (µmol/kg) | ||||
|
| 12.14 | 33.58 | 2263.57 | 2093.78 | 7.99 | 465.82 | 1959.02 | 125.46 | 1.91 | 3.00 |
| (±0.48) | (±0.72) | (±15.70) | (±12.69) | (±0.05) | (±63.15) | (±30.99) | (±12.67) | (±0.20) | (±0.31) | |
|
| 15.84 | 33.71 | 2263.75 | 2087.47 | 7.95 | 516.77 | 1942.52 | 131.45 | 2.02 | 3.15 |
| (±0.27) | (±0.69) | (±15.99) | (±13.67) | (±0.03) | (±40.94) | (±18.28) | (±8.00) | (±0.12) | (±0.19) | |
|
| 12.18 | 33.63 | 2264.69 | 2213.62 | 7.65 | 1087.69 | 2113.12 | 63.35 | 0.97 | 1.52 |
| (±0.48) | (±0.71) | (±16.97) | (±19.08) | (±0.06) | (±169.87) | (±21.27) | (±9.57) | (±0.14) | (±0.23) | |
|
| 16.11 | 33.54 | 2265.32 | 2205.95 | 7.63 | 1161.35 | 2101.03 | 69.07 | 1.06 | 1.66 |
| (±0.28) | (±0.72) | (±16.50) | (±15.69) | (±0.05) | (±136.86) | (±17.23) | (±7.37) | (±0.11) | (±0.17) |
Standard deviations shown in parentheses (±SD) below corresponding mean value (n = 12). Measured values: temperature (T), salinity (Sal), total alkalinity (TA), and dissolved inorganic carbon (DIC). Modelled values: pH total scale (pHT), CO2 partial pressure (pCO2), bicarbonate (HCO3 −), carbonate (CO3 −2), aragonite saturation state (Ωarag) and calcite saturation state (Ωcalc).
Two-way ANOVA results comparing the effects of pH and temperature on immunology (a. haemocyte counts, b. phagocytosis, c. NBT) in Mytilus edulis following a 6 month exposure period.
| Source of variation | df | SS | MS |
|
|
|
| |||||
| pH | 1 | 0.435 | 0.435 | 0.923 | 0.351 |
| Temperature | 1 | 11.476 | 11.476 | 24.343 |
|
| pH*Temperature | 1 | 0.528 | 0.528 | 1.120 | 0.306 |
|
| |||||
| pH | 1 | 30.854 | 30.854 | 0.271 | 0.610 |
| Temperature | 1 | 1720.224 | 1720.224 | 15.133 |
|
| pH*Temperature | 1 | 649.686 | 649.686 | 5.715 |
|
|
| |||||
| pH | 1 | 0.186 | 0.186 | 4.740 |
|
| Temperature | 1 | 0.419 | 0.419 | 10.668 |
|
| pH*Temperature | 1 | 0.045 | 0.045 | 1.137 | 0.302 |
Significant values shown in bold (p<0.05).
Figure 1Effects of temperature and pH on haemocyte count (106 mL−1) (±1 SE) in Mytilus edulis (n = 5) following a six month exposure period to varying temperature and pH conditions.
Baseline value shown in grey scale. Lowercase letters indicate significant differences.
Figure 2Effects of temperature and pH on phagocytosis (% phagocytosed haemocytes) (±1 SE) in haemocytes from Mytilus edulis (n = 5) following a six month exposure period to varying temperature and pH conditions.
Baseline value shown in grey scale. Lowercase letters indicate significant differences.
Figure 3Effect of temperature and pH on the reduction of Nitroblue tetrazolium (NBT) (±1 SE) in haemocytes from Mytilus edulis (n = 5) following a six month exposure period to varying temperature and pH conditions (OD = optical density at λ = 620 nm).
Baseline value shown in grey scale. Lowercase letters indicate significant differences.
PCR screening results of the Menai Strait Mytilus edulis using different primer pairs.
| Treatment | Me15 | EUBA | Univ16s EUBf | 18ScomF1 | ITs | HAP-F1 | ssu980 |
| Me16 | EUBB | Univ16s EUBr | 18ScomR1 | HAP-R3 | HAP-R1 | ||
|
|
| 0% | 92% | 7% | 0% | 60% | 3% |
| (28/30) | (2/30) | (18/30) | (1/30) | ||||
|
|
| 0% | 92% | 67% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| (11/12) | (8/12) | ||||||
|
|
| 33% | 67% | 25% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| (4/12) | (8/12) | (3/12) | |||||
|
|
| 0% | 83% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| (10/12) | |||||||
|
|
| 0% | 92% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| (11/12) |
Prevalence of parasites in Mytilus edulis by histology.
| Treatment | Ciliate |
| Trematode |
|
| Prokaryote inclusions |
| Haplosporidian sp. |
|
| 6%) | 27% | 22% | 50% | 6% | 0% | 0% | 33% |
| (2/30 | (8/30) | (6/30) | (15/30) | (2/30) | (10/30) | |||
|
| 0% | 33% | 0% | 42% | 0% | 58% | 0% | 0% |
| (4/12) | (5/12) | (7/12) | ||||||
|
| 25% | 0% | 25% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| (3/12) | (3/12) | |||||||
|
| 0% | 33% | 0% | 33% | 8% | 83% | 0% | 0% |
| (4/12) | (4/12) | (1/12) | (10/12) | |||||
|
| 0% | 42% | 8% | 8% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| (5/12) | (1/12) | (1/12) |
Initial prevalence and prevalence following 6 month exposure to ambient, warming, acidified or acidified+warming seawater conditions are presented.
Figure 4Prevalence of parasites in Mytilus edulis.
Prevalence of morphological changes in Mytilus edulis by histology.
| Treatment | Brown mantle | Lipofuscin | Haemocyte infiltration |
| (Melanin aggregates) | |||
|
| 0% | 3% | 3% |
| (1/30) | (1/30) | ||
|
| 17% | 33% | 17% |
| (2/12) | (4/12) | (2/12) | |
|
| 42% | 25% | 58% |
| (5/12) | (3/12) | (7/12) | |
|
| 42% | 17% | 0% |
| (5/12) | (2/12) | ||
|
| 75% | 42% | 33% |
| (9/12) | (5/12) | (4/12) |
Initial prevalence and prevalence following 6 month exposure to ambient, warming, acidified or acidified+warming seawater conditions are presented.
Figure 5Prevalence of morphological changes in Mytilus edulis.