Literature DB >> 24926941

Enhancing trial integrity by protecting the independence of data monitoring committees in clinical trials.

Thomas R Fleming1, Charles H Hennekens, Marc A Pfeffer, David L DeMets.   

Abstract

Data monitoring committees (DMCs) have important roles in safeguarding patient interests and enhancing trial integrity and credibility. To effectively fulfill their responsibilities, DMCs should be independent of study sponsors, study investigators, and caregivers managing study participants. Unfortunately, in real-world settings where DMCs are in place, there are some practices that threaten to diminish the level of independence of these committees. To address this, some important approaches should be considered: A DMC charter should outline the roles and responsibilities of the DMC without appearing to be a legal contract; the meetings of the DMC should be led by its chair, ideally with a meeting format that ensures independence from the investigators and sponsor; the DMC and those having leadership roles in the monitoring process should have adequate training and experience; procedures should be in place to enable the DMC to have access to interim safety and efficacy data that are accurate, current, and comprehensive; these data should be presented to the DMC unblinded by treatment group, while being kept confidential from all others; DMC recommendations should be developed through consensus development rather than by casting votes; creative approaches are needed for the engagement of DMC members to increase the transparency such that they are neither employees of nor consultants to the sponsor of the trial; meaningful conflicts of interest should be identified and addressed; and finally, members of DMCs should have adequate indemnification that provides effective protection.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Confidentiality; Conflict of interest; DMC charter; Indemnification

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24926941      PMCID: PMC4153744          DOI: 10.1080/10543406.2014.925719

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biopharm Stat        ISSN: 1054-3406            Impact factor:   1.051


  5 in total

1.  Protecting research subjects--what must be done.

Authors:  D Shalala
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2000-09-14       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Data safety monitoring boards: legal and ethical considerations for research accountability.

Authors:  Patricia M Tereskerz
Journal:  Account Res       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 2.622

3.  The need for large-scale randomized evidence without undue emphasis on small trials, meta-analyses, or subgroup analyses.

Authors:  Charles H Hennekens; David Demets
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2009-12-02       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Liability issues for data monitoring committee members.

Authors:  David L DeMets; Thomas R Fleming; Frank Rockhold; Barry Massie; Thomas Merchant; Alan Meisel; Barbara Mishkin; Janet Wittes; David Stump; Robert Califf
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 2.486

5.  Maintaining confidentiality of interim data to enhance trial integrity and credibility.

Authors:  Thomas R Fleming; Katrina Sharples; John McCall; Andrew Moore; Anthony Rodgers; Ralph Stewart
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 2.486

  5 in total
  7 in total

1.  Data Monitoring Committees: Current issues.

Authors:  Thomas R Fleming; Susan S Ellenberg; David L DeMets
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2018-04-09       Impact factor: 2.486

2.  Data monitoring committees for pragmatic clinical trials.

Authors:  Susan S Ellenberg; Richard Culbertson; Daniel L Gillen; Steven Goodman; Suzanne Schrandt; Maryan Zirkle
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2015-09-15       Impact factor: 2.486

3.  Lessons Learned: Early Termination of a Randomized Trial of Calcineurin Inhibitor and Corticosteroid Avoidance Using Belatacept.

Authors:  K A Newell; A K Mehta; C P Larsen; P G Stock; A B Farris; S G Mehta; D Ikle; B Armstrong; Y Morrison; N Bridges; M Robien; R B Mannon
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2017-07-03       Impact factor: 8.086

4.  Data monitoring committees: Promoting best practices to address emerging challenges.

Authors:  Thomas R Fleming; David L DeMets; Matthew T Roe; Janet Wittes; Karim A Calis; Amit N Vora; Alan Meisel; Raymond P Bain; Marvin A Konstam; Michael J Pencina; David J Gordon; Kenneth W Mahaffey; Charles H Hennekens; James D Neaton; Gail D Pearson; Tomas Lg Andersson; Marc A Pfeffer; Susan S Ellenberg
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2017-02-01       Impact factor: 2.486

Review 5.  Reporting of data monitoring boards in publications of randomized clinical trials is often deficient: ACTTION systematic review.

Authors:  Jennifer S Gewandter; Rachel A Kitt; Matthew R Hunsinger; Joseph Poku; Jacqueline Lozano; Jenna Chaudari; Scott Evans; Robert A Gross; Michael P McDermott; Michael C Rowbotham; Dennis C Turk; Robert H Dworkin
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2017-01-23       Impact factor: 6.437

6.  Protecting the confidentiality of interim data: addressing current challenges.

Authors:  Thomas R Fleming
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2014-12-04       Impact factor: 2.486

Review 7.  Sharing interim trial results by the Data Safety Monitoring Board with those responsible for the trial's conduct and progress: a narrative review.

Authors:  Victoria Borg Debono; Lawrence Mbuagbaw; Lehana Thabane
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2017-03-09       Impact factor: 2.279

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.