| Literature DB >> 24926375 |
Zhaohui Wu1, Quanjun Zhao1, Zengmin Tian1, Jianning Zhang1, Xia Xiao1, Hong Lin1, Hong Wang1, Fuli Wang1.
Abstract
The aim of the present study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a newly developed robot-assisted frameless stereotactic system for deep electrode implantation and radiofrequency thermocoagulation (RFTC). Deep-electrode implantation was performed in the bilateral mesial temporal lobes of seven patients. Following the implantation of the deep electrodes through the monitored designed path, the epileptogenic zones were determined with the assistance of a robot system. Deep electrode electroencephalograms were recorded prior to and following RFTC. Treatment outcomes were evaluated by computed tomography scans and Engel classification criteria. The procedure was well tolerated by all patients with no patients suffered from severe permanent complications. After follow-ups for 34-62 months, four patients achieved Engel class I, including three patients with Ia classification, two patients were classified as Engel class IVa and one patient was classified as Engel class IVc. Therefore, robot-assisted frameless stereotaxy for deep electrode implantation and RFTC is indicated to be a safe and effective method that may be used effectively in clinical practice.Entities:
Keywords: deep electrodes; epilepsy; radiofrequency thermocoagulation; robotics; stereotactic techniques
Year: 2014 PMID: 24926375 PMCID: PMC4043615 DOI: 10.3892/etm.2014.1620
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Exp Ther Med ISSN: 1792-0981 Impact factor: 2.447
Figure 1Robot-assisted stereotactic puncture surgery. The image shown on the computer screen located at the left of the figure shows the robot-manipulator auxiliary intracranial target.
Figure 2Deep electrode EEG recording of a patient with a seizure in the left medial temporal lobe. EEG, electroencephalogram.
Figure 3Left temporal spike wave rhythm shown in a deep electrode EEG recording following the injection of bemegride. A sharp and slow wave rhythm is exhibited. EEG, electroencephalogram.
Treatment outcomes of seven patients who received robot-assisted RFTC.
| Coagulations | RFTC targets | Follow-up time, months | Seizure frequency prior to RFTC, per month | Seizure frequency after RFTC, per month |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4R/7L | Bilateral hippocampus | 62 | 10 | 1 |
| 8L | Left amygdala and hippocampus | 62 | 4 | 4.5 |
| 6L | Left hippocampus | 43 | 10 | 0 |
| 8L | Left amygdala and hippocampus | 38 | 6 | 0 |
| 5R/5L | Bilateral hippocampus | 38 | 10 | 5 |
| 6L | Left hippocampus | 35 | 2 | 0 |
| 6R/7L | Bilateral hippocampus | 34 | 2.5 | 1 |
nR, number of coagulations on the left; nR, number of coagulations on the right. RFTC, radiofrequency thermocoagulation.
Figure 4Comparison of MRI scans prior to and following robot assisted RFTC treatment. (A) Cerebellar hypoplasia was confirmed preoperatively. (B) Following robot assisted RFTC treatment, the volume of the right hippocampus still less than the left, the right temporal horn still larger than left and the target of RFTC treatment was the head of the left hippocampus. RFTC, radiofrequency thermocoagulation; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging.