| Literature DB >> 24926362 |
Xiaoli Zhang1, Yin Wu1, Kun Sun1, Jing Tan1.
Abstract
The aim of the present study was to investigate the effect of erythropoietin (EPO) loading chitosan-tripolyphosphate (CS-TPP) nanoparticles on an immunoglobulin A nephropathy (IgAN) rat model. CS-TPP nanoparticles were produced from CS and TPP and EPO was loaded by mixing with the nanoparticles. The IgAN rat models were randomly divided into three groups: the CS-TPP-EPO group, CS-TPP group and EPO group. Hemoglobin (Hb), blood urea nitrogen (BUN) and creatinine (Cr) levels were measured in each group using a Biochemical Analyzer (Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan). The average size of nanoparticles was 485±12 nm and the encapsulation efficiency of EPO was 78.45%. The EPO release curve in CS-TPP-EPO nanoparticles exhibited a biphasic distribution in vitro. The levels of BUN and Cr in the CS-TPP-EPO group were significantly lower compared with the control group (P<0.05); however, the level of Hb in the CS-TPP-EPO group was higher compared with the other groups (P<0.05). The changes in Hb, BUN and Cr in the CS-TPP-EPO group were maintained for less than one week following the end of the treatment with CS-TPP-EPO nanoparticles. In conclusion, the CS-TPP-EPO nanoparticles had a lower toxicity compared with EPO and CS-TPP treatment. Furthermore, CS-TPP-EPO may improve the therapeutic effect in the IgAN model. This suggests that CS-TPP-EPO nanoparticles may be a potential therapeutic drug for the treatment of patients with IgAN.Entities:
Keywords: IgA nephropathy; chitosan-tripolyphosphate; erythropoietin; nanoparticles; renal function
Year: 2014 PMID: 24926362 PMCID: PMC4043601 DOI: 10.3892/etm.2014.1643
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Exp Ther Med ISSN: 1792-0981 Impact factor: 2.447
Figure 1Scanning electron microscopy showing the morphology of chitosan-tripolyphosphate-erythropoietin nanoparticles.
EE of bovine serum albumin-loading in CS/TPP nanoparticles prepared with different concentrations of CS and EPO (0.5% TPP; pH 5.7; weight ratio of CS to EPO, 1:1).
| Concentration of CS (% w/v) | Weight of EPO | EE (%) |
|---|---|---|
| 0.125 | 0.0375 | 25.10 |
| 0.25 | 0.75 | 78.45 |
| 0.5 | 0.15 | 74.63 |
| 1.0 | 0.3 | 63.22 |
EE, encapsulation efficiency; CS, chitosan; TPP, tripolyphosphate; EPO, erythropoietin.
Figure 2Release curve of EPO from chitosan-tripolyphosphate-EPO nanoparticles. EPO, erythropoietin.
Evaluation of BUN, Cr and Hb during the treatment at different time points.
| Week 0 | Week 1 | Week 2 | Week 3 | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||
| Group | BUN (mmol/l) | Cr (μmol/l) | Hb (g/dl) | BUN (mmol/l) | Cr (μmol/l) | Hb (g/dl) | BUN (mmol/l) | Cr (μmol/l) | Hb (g/dl) | BUN (mmol/l) | Cr (μmol/l) | Hb (g/dl) |
| EPO | 255.66±3.46 | 51.04±15.84 | 13.75±1.57 | 135.78±4.23 | 32.08±6.35 | 15.23±0.37 | 118.25±4.24 | 25.07±3.14 | 16.57±2.16 | 165.38±4.28 | 40.12±8.26 | 14.58±0.45 |
| CS-TPP | 238.35±4.11 | 49.67±12.38 | 13.47±1.28 | 252.43±4.32 | 53.26±5.85 | 12.82±3.25 | 258.28±3.39 | 55.21±6.21 | 11.85±0.87 | 264.32±3.92 | 57.34±10.3 | 11.05±0.65 |
| CS-TPP-EPO | 240.45±4.37 | 49.87±14.58 | 12.86±1.08 | 126.42±3.72 | 29.92±7.04 | 14.78±0.44 | 120.20±3.22 | 23.59±11.48 | 15.25±0.58 | 115.46±3.27 | 22.37±12.6 | 15.30±0.58 |
P<0.05,
P<0.01,
P<0.01 indicate a significant difference compared with week 0.
BUN, blood urea nitrogen; Cr, creatine; Hb hemoglobin; EPO, erythropoietin; CS, chitosan; TPP, tripolyphosphate.