| Literature DB >> 24926338 |
Feng Tan1, Jie Chen1, Yangui Liang1, Minhua Gu2, Yanping Li1, Xuewen Wang1, DI Meng1.
Abstract
Cerebral ischemia induces injury, not only in the ischemic core and surrounding penumbra tissues, but also in remote areas such as the cervical spinal cord. The aim of the present study was to determine the effects of electroacupuncture (EA) on cervical spinal cord injury following cerebral ischemia/reperfusion in stroke-prone renovascular hypertensive (RHRSP) rats. The results demonstrated that neuronal loss, which was assayed by Nissl staining in the cervical spinal cords of RHRSP rats subjected to transient middle cerebral artery occlusion (MCAO), was markedly decreased by EA stimulation at the GV20 (Baihui) and GV14 (Dazhui) acupoints compared with that in rats undergoing sham stimulation. Quantitative polymerase chain reaction and western blot analysis demonstrated that EA stimulation blocked the MCAO-induced elevated protein expression levels of glial fibrillary acidic protein and amyloid precursor protein in the cervical spinal cord at days 24 and 48. To further investigate the mechanism underlying the neuroprotective role of EA stimulation, the protein expression levels of Nogo-A and Nogo-66 receptor-1 (NgR1), two key regulatory molecules for neurite growth, were recorded in each group. The results revealed that EA stimulation reduced the MCAO-induced elevation of Nogo-A and NgR1 protein levels at day 14 and 28 in RHRSP rats. Therefore, the results demonstrated that EA reduced cervical spinal cord injury following cerebral ischemia in RHRSP rats, indicating that EA has the potential to be developed as a therapeutic treatment agent for cervical spinal cord injury following stroke.Entities:
Keywords: cerebral ischemia; cervical spinal cord; neuron; stroke-prone renovascular hypertensive rats
Year: 2014 PMID: 24926338 PMCID: PMC4043606 DOI: 10.3892/etm.2014.1619
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Exp Ther Med ISSN: 1792-0981 Impact factor: 2.447
Number of Nissl stained cells per mm2 in the cervical spinal cord at various time points following MCAO (mean ± SD).
| Group | Day 1 | Day 7 | Day 14 | Day 28 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hypertension | 25.93±1.67 | 29.27±2.87 | 26.60±1.21 | 26.07±1.78 |
| Sham surgery | 25.70±1.90 | 27.37±2.12 | 28.03±1.11 | 27.20±1.28 |
| Ischemia | 27.35±1.09 | 29.02±1.06 | 26.35±1.20 | 15.02±1.18 |
| EA stimulation | 25.82±2.07 | 29.15±1.85 | 27.48±1.26 | 21.32±1.60 |
| Sham stimulation | 26.83±1.15 | 30.17±1.33 | 26.17±1.35 | 16.17±1.05 |
P<0.05, vs. hypertension group;
P<0.05, vs. ischemia group; (n=15 per group).
MCAO, middle cerebral artery occlusion; EA, electroacupuncture.
Figure 1Effects of EA on the expression levels of GFAP and APP in the cervical spinal cord following cerebral ischemia in RHRSP rats; magnification, ×20. Representative immunohistochemical staining images showing (A–F) GFAP-positive and (G–L) APP-positive cell expression at day 14 and 28 after MCAO in the cervical spinal cord of rats that received sham or EA stimulation. EA, electroacupuncture; GFAP, glial fibrillary acidic protein; APP, amyloid precursor protein; RHRSP, stroke-prone renovascular hypertensive; MCAO, middle cerebral artery occlusion.
Expression of Nogo-A positive cells in the cervical spinal cord at various time points following MCAO (mean ± SD).
| Group | Day 1 | Day 7 | Day 14 | Day 28 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hypertension | 1.091±0.318 | 1.121±0.326 | 1.113±0.228 | 1.124±0.268 |
| Sham surgery | 1.110±0.204 | 1.136±0.238 | 1.117±0.122 | 1.142±0.286 |
| Ischemia | 1.131±0.418 | 1.156±0.324 | 1.229±0.375 | 1.242±0.182 |
| EA stimulation | 1.112±0.226 | 1.144±0.229 | 1.174±0.273 | 1.197±0.312 |
| Sham stimulation | 1.117±0.217 | 1.146±0.234 | 1.210±0.298 | 1.230±0.405 |
P<0.05, vs. hypertension group;
P<0.05, vs. ischemia group; (n=15 per group).
MCAO, middle cerebral artery occlusion; EA, electroacupuncture.
Expression of NgR1 positive cells in the cervical spinal cord at various time points following MCAO (mean ± SD).
| Group | Day 1 | Day 7 | Day 14 | Day 28 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hypertension | 1.239±0.270 | 1.253±0.285 | 1.246±0.375 | 1.273±0.263 |
| Sham surgery | 1.228±0.388 | 1.229±0.229 | 1.235±0.211 | 1.265±0.294 |
| Ischemia | 1.236±0.280 | 1.226±0.321 | 1.325±0.239 | 1.358±0.274 |
| EA stimulation | 1.244±0.375 | 1.234±0.279 | 1.294±0.293 | 1.315±0.227 |
| Sham stimulation | 1.241±0.295 | 1.238±0.204 | 1.311±0.370 | 1.344±0.311 |
P<0.05, vs. hypertension group;
P<0.05, vs. ischemia group; (n=15 per group).
MCAO, middle cerebral artery occlusion; EA, electroacupuncture.
Nogo-A mRNA expression levels in the cervical spinal cord at various time points following MCAO (mean ± SD).
| Group | Day 1 | Day 7 | Day 14 | Day 28 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hypertension | 0.221±0.049 | 0.254±0.035 | 0.251±0.041 | 0.232±0.048 |
| Sham surgery | 0.227±0.038 | 0.250±0.043 | 0.255±0.036 | 0.242±0.040 |
| Ischemia | 0.276±0.044 | 0.285±0.032 | 0.272±0.039 | 0.451±0.062 |
| EA stimulation | 0.238±0.047 | 0.245±0.033 | 0.259±0.043 | 0.319±0.049 |
| Sham stimulation | 0.267±0.045 | 0.265±0.044 | 0.261±0.038 | 0.428±0.065 |
P<0.05, vs. hypertension group;
P<0.05, vs. ischemia group; (n=15 per group).
MCAO, middle cerebral artery occlusion; EA, electroacupuncture.
NgR mRNA expression levels in the cervical spinal cord at various time points following MCAO (mean ± SD).
| Group | Day 1 | Day 7 | Day 14 | Day 28 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hypertension | 0.347±0.052 | 0.332±0.051 | 0.353±0.069 | 0.357±0.063 |
| Sham surgery | 0.356±0.058 | 0.344±0.049 | 0.342±0.061 | 0.363±0.054 |
| Ischemia | 0.387±0.048 | 0.383±0.039 | 0.379±0.065 | 0.366±0.078 |
| EA stimulation | 0.334±0.075 | 0.336±0.059 | 0.361±0.035 | 0.351±0.057 |
| Sham stimulation | 0.364±0.055 | 0.374±0.041 | 0.368±0.044 | 0.303±0.081 |
P<0.05, vs. hypertension group;
P<0.05, vs. ischemia group; (n=15 per group).
MCAO, middle cerebral artery occlusion; EA, electroacupuncture.