Literature DB >> 24925861

Tissue damage modeling in gene electrotransfer: the role of pH.

N Olaiz1, E Signori2, F Maglietti1, A Soba1, C Suárez1, P Turjanski1, S Michinski3, G Marshall4.   

Abstract

Optimal gene electrotransfer (GET) requires a compromise between maximum transgene expression and minimal tissue damage. GET in skeletal muscle can be improved by pretreatment with hyaluronidase which contributes to maximize transgene uptake and expression. Nevertheless, tissue damage remains severe close to the electrodes, with a concomitant loss of GET efficiency. Here we analyze the role of pH in tissue damage in GET protocols through in vivo modeling using a transparent chamber implanted into the dorsal skinfold of a mouse (DSC) and intravital microscopy, and in silico modeling using the Poisson-Nernst-Planck equations for ion transport. DSC intravital microscopy reveals the existence of pH fronts emerging from both electrodes and that these fronts are immediate and substantial thus giving rise to tissue necrosis. Theoretical modeling confirms experimental measurements and shows that in GET protocols whether with or without hyaluronidase pretreatment, pH fronts are the principal cause of muscle damage near the electrodes. It also predicts that an optimal efficiency in GET protocols, that is a compromise between obtaining maximum electroporated area and minimal tissue damage, is achieved when the electric field applied is near 183 V/cm in a GET protocol and 158 V/cm in a hyaluronidase+GET protocol.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Computational modeling; Gene electrotransfer; Hyaluronidase; pH

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24925861     DOI: 10.1016/j.bioelechem.2014.05.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bioelectrochemistry        ISSN: 1567-5394            Impact factor:   5.373


  11 in total

1.  Electroporation optimizes the uptake of boron-10 by tumor for boron neutron capture therapy (BNCT) mediated by GB-10: a boron biodistribution study in the hamster cheek pouch oral cancer model.

Authors:  Marcela A Garabalino; Nahuel Olaiz; Agustina Portu; Gisela Saint Martin; Silvia I Thorp; Emiliano C C Pozzi; Paula Curotto; María E Itoiz; Andrea Monti Hughes; Lucas L Colombo; David W Nigg; Verónica A Trivillin; Guillermo Marshall; Amanda E Schwint
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2019-05-23       Impact factor: 1.925

Review 2.  Electrochemotherapy of tumors as in situ vaccination boosted by immunogene electrotransfer.

Authors:  Gregor Sersa; Justin Teissie; Maja Cemazar; Emanuela Signori; Urska Kamensek; Guillermo Marshall; Damijan Miklavcic
Journal:  Cancer Immunol Immunother       Date:  2015-06-12       Impact factor: 6.968

Review 3.  Gene Electrotransfer: A Mechanistic Perspective.

Authors:  Christelle Rosazza; Sasa Haberl Meglic; Andreas Zumbusch; Marie-Pierre Rols; Damijan Miklavcic
Journal:  Curr Gene Ther       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 4.391

4.  The Efficiency of Gene Electrotransfer in Breast-Cancer Cell Lines Cultured on a Novel Collagen-Free 3D Scaffold.

Authors:  Elisabetta Sieni; Monica Dettin; Mariangela De Robertis; Bianca Bazzolo; Maria Teresa Conconi; Annj Zamuner; Ramona Marino; Flavio Keller; Luca Giovanni Campana; Emanuela Signori
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2020-04-23       Impact factor: 6.639

5.  Numerical study of gene electrotransfer efficiency based on electroporation volume and electrophoretic movement of plasmid DNA.

Authors:  Tadeja Forjanič; Damijan Miklavčič
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2018-06-18       Impact factor: 2.819

6.  Toward a clinical real time tissue ablation technology: combining electroporation and electrolysis (E2).

Authors:  Enric Guenther; Nina Klein; Paul Mikus; Florin Botea; Mihail Pautov; Franco Lugnani; Matteo Macchioro; Irinel Popescu; Michael K Stehling; Boris Rubinsky
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2020-01-20       Impact factor: 2.984

7.  Numerical mesoscale tissue model of electrochemotherapy in liver based on histological findings.

Authors:  Helena Cindric; Gorana Gasljevic; Ibrahim Edhemovic; Erik Brecelj; Jan Zmuc; Maja Cemazar; Alenka Seliskar; Damijan Miklavcic; Bor Kos
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-04-20       Impact factor: 4.996

8.  Simultaneous electroporation and dielectrophoresis in non-electrolytic micro/nano-electroporation.

Authors:  Chenang Lyu; Jianping Wang; Matthew Powell-Palm; Boris Rubinsky
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-02-06       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  In Vivo Evaluation of a New Recombinant Hyaluronidase to Improve Gene Electro-Transfer Protocols for DNA-Based Drug Delivery against Cancer.

Authors:  Mariangela De Robertis; Lise Pasquet; Luisa Loiacono; Elisabeth Bellard; Luciano Messina; Susanna Vaccaro; Roberta Di Pasquale; Vito Michele Fazio; Marie-Pierre Rols; Justin Teissie; Muriel Golzio; Emanuela Signori
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2018-10-28       Impact factor: 6.639

10.  Electroporation and cell killing by milli- to nanosecond pulses and avoiding neuromuscular stimulation in cancer ablation.

Authors:  Emily Gudvangen; Vitalii Kim; Vitalij Novickij; Federico Battista; Andrei G Pakhomov
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-02-02       Impact factor: 4.996

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.