Literature DB >> 24925674

Validation of plasma proneurotensin as a novel biomarker for the prediction of incident breast cancer.

Olle Melander1, Mattias Belting2, Jonas Manjer3, Alan S Maisel4, Bo Hedblad5, Gunnar Engström6, Peter Nilsson5, Joachim Struck7, Oliver Hartmann7, Andreas Bergmann8, Marju Orho-Melander6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: High fasting plasma proneurotensin concentration was associated with the development of breast cancer in the Malmö Diet and Cancer Study (MDCS). Here, we aimed at replicating the initial finding in an independent second cohort.
METHODS: The Malmö Preventive Project (MPP) is a population study and comprised 18,240 subjects when examined in 2002-2006. Of women without history of breast cancer at examination, we included all who developed breast cancer during follow-up (n = 130) until December 31, 2010, and a random sample of women without breast cancer until the end of follow-up (n = 1,439) for baseline plasma proneurotensin assessment (mean age, 70.0 ± 4.4 years). Proneurotensin was measured in fasting plasma samples and was related to the risk of later breast cancer development using multivariate logistic regression.
RESULTS: Proneurotensin [odds ratio (OR) per standard deviation (SD) increment of LN-transformed proneurotensin] was significantly related to incident breast cancer [OR, 2.09; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.79-2.44; P < 0.001; adjusted for age, body mass index (BMI), smoking, and hormone replacement therapy]. The effect estimate in the MPP was larger than in the discovery cohort (MDCS), with the main difference between the two cohorts being that women of the MPP study were on the average about 10 years older and follow-up time was shorter than that of the MDCS.
CONCLUSION: As initially found in the MDCS, fasting plasma proneurotensin was significantly associated with the development of breast cancer in the MPP study as well. IMPACT: Measurement of plasma proneurotensin warrants further investigation as a blood-based marker for early breast cancer detection. ©2014 American Association for Cancer Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24925674     DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-13-1200

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev        ISSN: 1055-9965            Impact factor:   4.254


  8 in total

Review 1.  Cardiovascular biomarkers and sex: the case for women.

Authors:  Lori B Daniels; Alan S Maisel
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2015-07-07       Impact factor: 32.419

Review 2.  Mechanistic Biomarkers Informative of Both Cancer and Cardiovascular Disease: JACC State-of-the-Art Review.

Authors:  Vivek Narayan; Elizabeth W Thompson; Biniyam Demissei; Jennifer E Ho; James L Januzzi; Bonnie Ky
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2020-06-02       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 3.  Breast cancer epidemic in the early twenty-first century: evaluation of risk factors, cumulative questionnaires and recommendations for preventive measures.

Authors:  Olga Golubnitschaja; Manuel Debald; Kristina Yeghiazaryan; Walther Kuhn; Martin Pešta; Vincenzo Costigliola; Godfrey Grech
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2016-07-22

4.  High plasma levels of pro-NT are associated with increased colon cancer risk.

Authors:  Li Li; Heidi L Weiss; Jing Li; Zhengyi Chen; Leslie Donato; B Mark Evers
Journal:  Endocr Relat Cancer       Date:  2020-11       Impact factor: 5.678

5.  Activation of AMPK Stimulates Neurotensin Secretion in Neuroendocrine Cells.

Authors:  Jing Li; Jun Song; Heidi L Weiss; Todd Weiss; Courtney M Townsend; B Mark Evers
Journal:  Mol Endocrinol       Date:  2015-11-03

6.  Association of cardiovascular events and lipoprotein particle size: Development of a risk score based on functional data analysis.

Authors:  Charles M Rowland; Dov Shiffman; Michael Caulfield; Veronica Garcia; Olle Melander; Trevor Hastie
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-03-07       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  Sex-Specific Cut-Offs for High-Sensitivity Cardiac Troponin: Is Less More?

Authors:  Giulio Francesco Romiti; Roberto Cangemi; Filippo Toriello; Eleonora Ruscio; Susanna Sciomer; Federica Moscucci; Marianna Vincenti; Clara Crescioli; Marco Proietti; Stefania Basili; Valeria Raparelli
Journal:  Cardiovasc Ther       Date:  2019-02-05       Impact factor: 3.023

Review 8.  The Role of Central Neurotensin in Regulating Feeding and Body Weight.

Authors:  Jariel Ramirez-Virella; Gina M Leinninger
Journal:  Endocrinology       Date:  2021-05-01       Impact factor: 4.736

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.