Literature DB >> 24925649

Self-control choice with electrical stimulation of the brain as a reinforcer.

J E Mazur1, J R Stellar2, M Waraczynski2.   

Abstract

In a discrete-trials procedure, rats chose between a small reinforcer (a low frequency of electrical stimulation of the brain) and a larger reinforcer (a higher frequency of stimulation). The small reinforcer was delivered after a delay that was constant within a condition but varied across conditions. The delay for the large reinforcer was increased or decreased many times a session in order to estimate an indifference point--a delay at which the two alternatives were chosen about equally often. When the indifference points from several conditions were plotted as a function of the delay for the small reinforcer, the resultant "indifference curves" had positive y-intercepts and slopes greater than 1.0. These results are similar to those obtained in previous studies with pigeons as subjects and food as the reinforcer, and they suggest that a hyperbolic equation describes the relation between a reinforcer's delay and its value or effectiveness. The fact that a large reinforcer delayed several seconds was chosen over a small reinforcer delivered almost immediately after a response provides further evidence against a simple reciprocal relation between delay and value.
Copyright © 1987. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Entities:  

Year:  1987        PMID: 24925649     DOI: 10.1016/0376-6357(87)90003-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Processes        ISSN: 0376-6357            Impact factor:   1.777


  6 in total

1.  Effects of reinforcer probability, delay, and response requirements on the choices of rats and pigeons: possible species differences.

Authors:  James E Mazur
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Delay-amount tradeoffs in choices by pigeons and rats: hyperbolic versus exponential discounting.

Authors:  James E Mazur; Dawn R Biondi
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Measuring Sexual Risk-Taking: A Systematic Review of the Sexual Delay Discounting Task.

Authors:  Nioud Mulugeta Gebru; Meher Kalkat; Justin C Strickland; Margaret Ansell; Robert F Leeman; Meredith S Berry
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  2022-07-15

Review 4.  Delay discounting: Pigeon, rat, human--does it matter?

Authors:  Ariana Vanderveldt; Luís Oliveira; Leonard Green
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn       Date:  2016-02-15       Impact factor: 2.478

5.  Scarce means with alternative uses: robbins' definition of economics and its extension to the behavioral and neurobiological study of animal decision making.

Authors:  Peter Shizgal
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2012-02-09       Impact factor: 4.677

6.  Valuation of opportunity costs by rats working for rewarding electrical brain stimulation.

Authors:  Rebecca Brana Solomon; Kent Conover; Peter Shizgal
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-08-25       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.