Literature DB >> 24925238

Kin discrimination within honey bee (Apis mellifera) colonies: An analysis of the evidence.

M D Breed1, C K Welch, R Cruz.   

Abstract

Compelling evolutionary arguments lead to the prediction that honey bee workers should discriminate between supersisters and half-sisters within colonies. We review the theoretical support for discrimination during swarming, queen rearing, feeding, and grooming. A survey of the data that tests whether such discrimination takes place shows that, despite substantial effort in a number of laboratories, there is no conclusive evidence for intracolony discrimination in any of the postulated contexts. The strongest suggestive data is in the critical context of queen rearing, but flaws in experimental design or analysis make the best available tests inconclusive. We present new data that shows that cues exist on which discriminations can be made among adult workers in nestmate recognition interactions and in feeding interactions, but our data does not differentiate between subfamily recognition and recognition associated with color phenotypes. We conclude that while selection may favor discrimination between supersisters and half-sisters, as a practical matter such discriminations play no role, or only a minor role, in the biology of the honey bee.
Copyright © 1994. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Entities:  

Year:  2002        PMID: 24925238     DOI: 10.1016/0376-6357(94)90058-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Processes        ISSN: 0376-6357            Impact factor:   1.777


  9 in total

1.  Informational constraints on optimal sex allocation in ants.

Authors:  Jacobus J Boomsma; Jannie Nielsen; Liselotte Sundström; Neil J Oldham; Jutta Tentschert; Hans Christian Petersen; E David Morgan
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-07-01       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Rare royal families in honeybees, Apis mellifera.

Authors:  Robin F A Moritz; H Michael G Lattorff; Peter Neumann; F Bernhard Kraus; Sarah E Radloff; H Randall Hepburn
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2005-10-28

3.  Sham nepotism as a result of intrinsic differences in brood viability in ants.

Authors:  Barbara Holzer; Rolf Kümmerli; Laurent Keller; Michel Chapuisat
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2006-08-22       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Foreign ant queens are accepted but produce fewer offspring.

Authors:  Barbara Holzer; Michel Chapuisat; Laurent Keller
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2008-07-12       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  No intracolonial nepotism during colony fissioning in honey bees.

Authors:  Juliana Rangel; Heather R Mattila; Thomas D Seeley
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-08-19       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Paternal signature in kin recognition cues of a social insect: concealed in juveniles, revealed in adults.

Authors:  Janine W Y Wong; Joël Meunier; Christophe Lucas; Mathias Kölliker
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2014-10-22       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Laboratory Assay of Brood Care for Quantitative Analyses of Individual Differences in Honey Bee (Apis mellifera) Affiliative Behavior.

Authors:  Hagai Y Shpigler; Gene E Robinson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-11-16       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Honey bees consider larval nutritional status rather than genetic relatedness when selecting larvae for emergency queen rearing.

Authors:  Ramesh R Sagili; Bradley N Metz; Hannah M Lucas; Priyadarshini Chakrabarti; Carolyn R Breece
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-05-16       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Cryptic "royal" subfamilies in honey bee (Apis mellifera) colonies.

Authors:  James M Withrow; David R Tarpy
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-07-11       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.