Literature DB >> 24924809

Using in situ voltammetry as a tool to identify and characterize habitats of iron-oxidizing bacteria: from fresh water wetlands to hydrothermal vent sites.

Daniel J MacDonald1, Alyssa J Findlay, Sean M McAllister, Josh M Barnett, Patricia Hredzak-Showalter, Sean T Krepski, Shane G Cone, Jarrod Scott, Sarah K Bennett, Clara S Chan, David Emerson, George W Luther Iii.   

Abstract

Iron-oxidizing bacteria (FeOB) likely play a large role in the biogeochemistry of iron, making the detection and understanding of the biogeochemical processes FeOB are involved in of critical importance. By deploying our in situ voltammetry system, we are able to measure a variety of redox species, specifically Fe(ii) and O2, simultaneously. This technique provides significant advantages in both characterizing the environments in which microaerophilic FeOB are found, and finding diverse conditions in which FeOB could potentially thrive. Described here are four environments with different salinities [one fresh groundwater seep site, one beach-groundwater mixing site, one hydrothermal vent site (Mid-Atlantic Ridge), and one estuary (Chesapeake Bay)] where in situ voltammetry was deployed, and where the presence of FeOB were confirmed by either culturing methods or molecular data. The sites varied in both O2 and Fe(ii) content with O2 ranging from below the 3 μM detection limit of the electrodes at the Chesapeake Bay suboxic zone, to as high 150 μM O2 at the vent site. In addition, a range of Fe(ii) concentrations supported FeOB communities, from 3 μM Fe(ii) in the Chesapeake Bay to 300 μM in the beach aquifer. In situ electrochemistry provides the means to quickly measure these redox gradients at appropriate resolution, making it possible in real time to detect niches likely inhabited by microaerophilic FeOB, then accurately sample for proof of FeOB presence and activity. This study demonstrates the utility of this approach while also greatly expanding our knowledge of FeOB habitats.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24924809     DOI: 10.1039/c4em00073k

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Process Impacts        ISSN: 2050-7887            Impact factor:   4.238


  5 in total

Review 1.  An evolving view on biogeochemical cycling of iron.

Authors:  Andreas Kappler; Casey Bryce; Muammar Mansor; Ulf Lueder; James M Byrne; Elizabeth D Swanner
Journal:  Nat Rev Microbiol       Date:  2021-02-01       Impact factor: 60.633

2.  Light-dependent sulfide oxidation in the anoxic zone of the Chesapeake Bay can be explained by small populations of phototrophic bacteria.

Authors:  Alyssa J Findlay; Alexa J Bennett; Thomas E Hanson; George W Luther
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2015-08-21       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Validating the Cyc2 Neutrophilic Iron Oxidation Pathway Using Meta-omics of Zetaproteobacteria Iron Mats at Marine Hydrothermal Vents.

Authors:  Sean M McAllister; Shawn W Polson; David A Butterfield; Brian T Glazer; Jason B Sylvan; Clara S Chan
Journal:  mSystems       Date:  2020-02-18       Impact factor: 6.496

4.  Microbial iron mats at the Mid-Atlantic Ridge and evidence that Zetaproteobacteria may be restricted to iron-oxidizing marine systems.

Authors:  Jarrod J Scott; John A Breier; George W Luther; David Emerson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-03-11       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Novel Pelagic Iron-Oxidizing Zetaproteobacteria from the Chesapeake Bay Oxic-Anoxic Transition Zone.

Authors:  Beverly K Chiu; Shingo Kato; Sean M McAllister; Erin K Field; Clara S Chan
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2017-07-18       Impact factor: 5.640

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.