Literature DB >> 24924416

Randomised, phase II, placebo-controlled, trial of fulvestrant plus vandetanib in postmenopausal women with bone only or bone predominant, hormone-receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC): the OCOG ZAMBONEY study.

Mark J Clemons1, Brandy Cochrane, Gregory R Pond, Nadia Califaretti, Stephen K L Chia, Rebecca Alexandra Dent, Xinni Song, Andre Robidoux, Sameer Parpia, David Warr, Daniel Rayson, Kathleen I Pritchard, Mark N Levine.   

Abstract

Biomarkers of bone turnover, including urine N-telopeptide (uNTx), have been used as surrogate measures of response to bone-targeted therapies. Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) levels correlate with extent of bone metastases. We assessed whether vandetanib, an inhibitor of VEGF, epidermal growth factor receptor and RET signalling, improved uNTx response when added to fulvestrant (F) in breast cancer patients with bone metastases. Postmenopausal patients with bone predominant, hormone-receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer were randomised to F (500 mg IM days 1, 15, 29, then monthly) with either vandetanib (100 mg PO OD) (FV) or placebo (FP). The primary objective was uNTx response. Secondary objectives included PFS, OS, RECIST response, pain scores and toxicity. Sixty-one patients were allocated to FV and 68 to FP. Out of 127 analyzable patients, an uNTx response occurred in 66 % for FV and 54 % for FP (p = 0.21). No difference was detected between groups for PFS; HR = 0.95 (95 % CI 0.65-1.38) or OS HR = 0.69 (95 % CI 0.37-1.31). For the 62 patients with measurable disease, clinical benefit rates were 41 and 43 %, respectively (p = 0.47). Serious adverse events were similar, 3.3 % for FV versus 5.9 % for FP. Elevated baseline uNTx (>65 nM BCE/mmol Cr) was prognostic for PFS, HR = 1.55 (95 % CI 1.04-2.30) and for OS, HR = 2.32 (95 % CI 1.25-4.33). The addition of vandetanib to fulvestrant did not improve biomarker response, PFS or OS in patients with bone metastases. Baseline bone turnover was prognostic for PFS and OS.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24924416     DOI: 10.1007/s10549-014-3015-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat        ISSN: 0167-6806            Impact factor:   4.872


  22 in total

Review 1.  Systemic treatment approaches in her2-negative advanced breast cancer-guidance on the guidelines.

Authors:  A A Joy; M Ghosh; R Fernandes; M J Clemons
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 3.677

Review 2.  Early clinical development of epidermal growth factor receptor targeted therapy in breast cancer.

Authors:  Naoko Matsuda; Bora Lim; Xiaoping Wang; Naoto T Ueno
Journal:  Expert Opin Investig Drugs       Date:  2017-03-08       Impact factor: 6.206

3.  Blood-based biomarkers in Alzheimer disease: Current state of the science and a novel collaborative paradigm for advancing from discovery to clinic.

Authors:  Sid E O'Bryant; Michelle M Mielke; Robert A Rissman; Simone Lista; Hugo Vanderstichele; Henrik Zetterberg; Piotr Lewczuk; Holly Posner; James Hall; Leigh Johnson; Yiu-Lian Fong; Johan Luthman; Andreas Jeromin; Richard Batrla-Utermann; Alcibiades Villarreal; Gabrielle Britton; Peter J Snyder; Kim Henriksen; Paula Grammas; Veer Gupta; Ralph Martins; Harald Hampel
Journal:  Alzheimers Dement       Date:  2016-11-18       Impact factor: 21.566

4.  Effects of de-escalated bisphosphonate therapy on bone turnover biomarkers in breast cancer patients with bone metastases.

Authors:  Christina L Addison; Gregory R Pond; Huijun Zhao; Sasha Mazzarello; Lisa Vandermeer; Robyn Goldstein; Eitan Amir; Mark Clemons
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2014-10-01

Review 5.  A national portfolio of bone oncology trials-The Canadian experience in 2012.

Authors:  I Kuchuk; D Simos; C L Addison; M Clemons
Journal:  J Bone Oncol       Date:  2012-10-17       Impact factor: 4.072

6.  EGFR Is Regulated by TFAP2C in Luminal Breast Cancer and Is a Target for Vandetanib.

Authors:  James P De Andrade; Jung M Park; Vivian W Gu; George W Woodfield; Mikhail V Kulak; Allison W Lorenzen; Vincent T Wu; Sarah E Van Dorin; Philip M Spanheimer; Ronald J Weigel
Journal:  Mol Cancer Ther       Date:  2016-02-01       Impact factor: 6.261

Review 7.  Are adjuvant bisphosphonates now standard of care of women with early stage breast cancer? A debate from the Canadian Bone and the Oncologist New Updates meeting.

Authors:  Carmel Jacobs; Eitan Amir; Alexander Paterson; Xiaofu Zhu; Mark Clemons
Journal:  J Bone Oncol       Date:  2015-06-23       Impact factor: 4.072

Review 8.  Pharmacologic management of bone-related complications and bone metastases in postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer.

Authors:  Denise A Yardley
Journal:  Breast Cancer (Dove Med Press)       Date:  2016-05-03

Review 9.  Receptor tyrosine kinases: Characterisation, mechanism of action and therapeutic interests for bone cancers.

Authors:  Aude I Ségaliny; Marta Tellez-Gabriel; Marie-Françoise Heymann; Dominique Heymann
Journal:  J Bone Oncol       Date:  2015-01-23       Impact factor: 4.072

10.  Correlation of baseline biomarkers with clinical outcomes and response to fulvestrant with vandetanib or placebo in patients with bone predominant metastatic breast cancer: An OCOG ZAMBONEY sub-study.

Authors:  Christina L Addison; Gregory R Pond; Brandy Cochrane; Huijun Zhao; Stephen K Chia; Mark N Levine; Mark Clemons
Journal:  J Bone Oncol       Date:  2015-06-12       Impact factor: 4.072

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.