Literature DB >> 24923933

Denture identification marking should be standard practice.

A Kalyan1, R K F Clark2, D R Radford3.   

Abstract

The focus of this opinion article is to revisit whether denture identification marking should be routine and standard practice at manufacture in the United Kingdom. The benefits of denture identification marking are evident in the literature particularly for those who are in residential care or who will have to seek care due to dementia or physical frailty; however, within the UK it is not normally practised. Many patients would appear to be unaware of denture marking, but present positive attitudes towards it. Results of a survey of UK dental laboratories would indicate that the vast majority of them offer an inclusion denture marking service with a mean cost of £5 per denture. Is the lack of denture marking in the UK due to dental professionals having differences in opinion, lack of education of professionals in training or financial disincentives?

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24923933     DOI: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2014.448

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br Dent J        ISSN: 0007-0610            Impact factor:   1.626


  11 in total

1.  Dental condition and identification marking of dentures in homes for the elderly in Göteborg, Sweden.

Authors:  I Stenberg; H I Borrman
Journal:  J Forensic Odontostomatol       Date:  1998-12

2.  A survey of denture identification marking within the United Kingdom.

Authors:  C A Murray; P T Boyd; B C Young; S Dhar; M Dickson; J N W Currie
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2007-10-12       Impact factor: 1.626

3.  The teaching of denture marking methods in dental schools in the United Kingdom and the United States.

Authors:  Raymond Richmond; Iain A Pretty
Journal:  J Forensic Sci       Date:  2009-10-05       Impact factor: 1.832

4.  Denture identification system.

Authors:  P Coss; J F Wolfaardt
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 3.426

5.  Attitudes to identification of dentures: the patients' perspective.

Authors:  M Cunningham; G Hoad-Reddick
Journal:  Quintessence Int       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 1.677

6.  Frequency of edentulism and identification marking of removable dentures in long-term care units.

Authors:  A Bengtsson; T Olsson; N René; G E Carlsson; U Dahlbom; H Borrman
Journal:  J Oral Rehabil       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 3.837

7.  An assessment of attitudes to, and extent of, the practice of denture marking in South Australia.

Authors:  P M Alexander; J A Taylor; F S Szuster; K A Brown
Journal:  Aust Dent J       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 2.291

8.  Prevalence of dementia in institutional care.

Authors:  Fiona E Matthews; Tom Dening
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2002-07-20       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  Denture marking--patient preference of various methods.

Authors:  Raymond Richmond; Iain A Pretty
Journal:  J Forensic Sci       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 1.832

Review 10.  Contemporary methods of labeling dental prostheses--a review of the literature.

Authors:  Raymond Richmond; Iain A Pretty
Journal:  J Forensic Sci       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 1.832

View more
  3 in total

1.  Prosthodontics: insightful identification.

Authors:  L Mudford
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 1.626

2.  An investigation into denture loss in hospitals in Kent, Surrey and Sussex.

Authors:  J Mann; M Doshi
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2017-08-25       Impact factor: 1.626

3.  The impact of a quality improvement initiative to reduce denture loss in an acute hospital.

Authors:  Mili Doshi; Daniel Gillway; Loraine Macintyre
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2022-04-04       Impact factor: 1.626

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.