PURPOSE: Suspected diabetogenic effects or drug indication may increase testing for diabetes mellitus (DM), resulting in measurement bias when evaluating diabetogenic drug effects. We sought to evaluate the validity of electronic health record data in determining DM risk. METHODS: We used time-dependent Cox proportional hazard models within a retrospective cohort design to assess associations between use of antihypertensives, statins, atypical antipsychotics, and antidepressants, and two endpoints: (i) DM onset defined as fasting blood glucose (BG) ≥126 mg/dl, random BG ≥200 mg/dl, HbA1c ≥7.0%, or antidiabetic drug initiation; and (ii) first negative DM test. We used Poisson regression to assess the influence of these drugs on DM testing rates. Patients aged 35-64 years enrolled in Kaiser Permanente Northwest between 1997 and 2010 entered the cohort at the first negative BG test after ≥6 months without manifest DM. RESULTS: All drug classes showed significant associations not only with DM onset but also with first negative BG test and with DM testing rates. Antipsychotics had the greatest diabetogenic risk (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] = 1.73 [1.44-2.08]), the greatest propensity for a first negative test (adjusted HR = 1.87 [1.74-2.01]), and the highest testing rate (adjusted rate ratio = 1.76 [1.72-1.81]. Although renin-angiotensin system blockers and calcium channel blockers have shown no diabetogenic risk in clinical trials, both were associated with DM (HR = 1.19 [1.12-1.26] and 1.27 [1.17-1.38]), a negative glucose test (1.38 [1.35-1.41] and 1.24 [1.20-1.28]), and increased testing rates (rate ratio = 1.26 [1.24-1.27] and 1.27 [1.25-1.28]). CONCLUSION: Caution should be used when diabetogenic risk is evaluated using data that rely on DM testing in general practice.
PURPOSE: Suspected diabetogenic effects or drug indication may increase testing for diabetes mellitus (DM), resulting in measurement bias when evaluating diabetogenic drug effects. We sought to evaluate the validity of electronic health record data in determining DM risk. METHODS: We used time-dependent Cox proportional hazard models within a retrospective cohort design to assess associations between use of antihypertensives, statins, atypical antipsychotics, and antidepressants, and two endpoints: (i) DM onset defined as fasting blood glucose (BG) ≥126 mg/dl, random BG ≥200 mg/dl, HbA1c ≥7.0%, or antidiabetic drug initiation; and (ii) first negative DM test. We used Poisson regression to assess the influence of these drugs on DM testing rates. Patients aged 35-64 years enrolled in Kaiser Permanente Northwest between 1997 and 2010 entered the cohort at the first negative BG test after ≥6 months without manifest DM. RESULTS: All drug classes showed significant associations not only with DM onset but also with first negative BG test and with DM testing rates. Antipsychotics had the greatest diabetogenic risk (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] = 1.73 [1.44-2.08]), the greatest propensity for a first negative test (adjusted HR = 1.87 [1.74-2.01]), and the highest testing rate (adjusted rate ratio = 1.76 [1.72-1.81]. Although renin-angiotensin system blockers and calcium channel blockers have shown no diabetogenic risk in clinical trials, both were associated with DM (HR = 1.19 [1.12-1.26] and 1.27 [1.17-1.38]), a negative glucose test (1.38 [1.35-1.41] and 1.24 [1.20-1.28]), and increased testing rates (rate ratio = 1.26 [1.24-1.27] and 1.27 [1.25-1.28]). CONCLUSION: Caution should be used when diabetogenic risk is evaluated using data that rely on DM testing in general practice.
Authors: Ajay K Gupta; Bjorn Dahlof; Joanna Dobson; Peter S Sever; Hans Wedel; N R Poulter Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2008-01-30 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Jeff J Guo; Paul E Keck; Patricia K Corey-Lisle; Hong Li; Dongming Jiang; Raymond Jang; Gilbert J L'Italien Journal: J Clin Psychiatry Date: 2006-07 Impact factor: 4.384
Authors: Linda B Piller; Sarah Baraniuk; Lara M Simpson; William C Cushman; Barry M Massie; Paula T Einhorn; Suzanne Oparil; Charles E Ford; James F Graumlich; Richard A Dart; David C Parish; Tamrat M Retta; Aloysius B Cuyjet; Syed Z Jafri; Curt D Furberg; Mohammad G Saklayen; Udho Thadani; Jeffrey L Probstfield; Barry R Davis Journal: Circulation Date: 2011-10-03 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Jackie Bosch; Salim Yusuf; Hertzel C Gerstein; Janice Pogue; Patrick Sheridan; Gilles Dagenais; Rafael Diaz; Alvaro Avezum; Fernando Lanas; Jeffrey Probstfield; George Fodor; Rury R Holman Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2006-09-15 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: J Steven Lamberti; John F Crilly; Kumar Maharaj; David Olson; Karen Wiener; Stephen Dvorin; G Oana Costea; Margaret P Bushey; Marci B Dietz Journal: J Clin Psychiatry Date: 2004-05 Impact factor: 4.384
Authors: Kathleen A McGinnis; Amy C Justice; Sam Bailin; Melissa Wellons; Matthew Freiberg; John R Koethe Journal: Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf Date: 2020-10-01 Impact factor: 2.890