Literature DB >> 24923696

The effect of 22 kHz calls and artificial 38 kHz signals on activity in rats.

G D Sales1.   

Abstract

Ultrasonic calls at 22 kHz are emitted by adult rats Rattus norvegicus when submissive, after and sometimes before copulation and in aversive situations, but the function of these calls, if any, is not known. This study examined the effect of 22 kHz calls on the behaviour of individuals. Rats were exposed singly for 5 min to a tape-recorded test signal; 22 kHz calls or artificial 38 kHz signals or tape noise. All rats were exposed to tape noise before and after the test signal. Both of the ultrasonic signals, and particularly the 22 kHz calls, decreased locomotor activity in rats during replay and for 5 min afterwards. Rats sniffed the loudspeaker less during the replay of 22 kHz calls than during the other test signals. These results complement others showing that constant frequency ultrasound from visual display units and oscilloscopes also depresses activity. In natural aggressive situations 22 kHz calls could allow a subordinate to escape and prevent the dominant wasting time in pursuit. In the laboratory exposure of rats to natural or artificial ultrasound could affect ongoing or subsequent behaviour and so be a confounding experimental variable.
Copyright © 1991. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Entities:  

Year:  1991        PMID: 24923696     DOI: 10.1016/0376-6357(91)90001-G

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Processes        ISSN: 0376-6357            Impact factor:   1.777


  12 in total

1.  Decreased approach behavior and nucleus accumbens immediate early gene expression in response to Parkinsonian ultrasonic vocalizations in rats.

Authors:  Joshua D Pultorak; Cynthia A Kelm-Nelson; Lauren R Holt; Katherine V Blue; Michelle R Ciucci; Aaron M Johnson
Journal:  Soc Neurosci       Date:  2015-09-14       Impact factor: 2.083

2.  Female urine-induced male mice ultrasonic vocalizations, but not scent-marking, is modulated by social experience.

Authors:  Florence I Roullet; Markus Wöhr; Jacqueline N Crawley
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2010-06-09       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  Positive and negative ultrasonic social signals elicit opposing firing patterns in rat amygdala.

Authors:  Ashwini J Parsana; Nanxin Li; Thomas H Brown
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2011-09-03       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  22 kHz and 55 kHz ultrasonic vocalizations differentially influence neural and behavioral outcomes: Implications for modeling anxiety via auditory stimuli in the rat.

Authors:  Camila Demaestri; Heather C Brenhouse; Jennifer A Honeycutt
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2018-12-03       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  Asymmetrical stimulus generalization following differential fear conditioning.

Authors:  Sun Jung Bang; Timothy A Allen; Lauren K Jones; Pawel Boguszewski; Thomas H Brown
Journal:  Neurobiol Learn Mem       Date:  2008-04-22       Impact factor: 2.877

6.  Social transmission of fear in rats: the role of 22-kHz ultrasonic distress vocalization.

Authors:  Eun Joo Kim; Earnest S Kim; Ellen Covey; Jeansok J Kim
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-12-01       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  On the relationships between ultrasonic calling and anxiety-related behavior in rats.

Authors:  R K W Schwarting; M Wöhr
Journal:  Braz J Med Biol Res       Date:  2012-03-22       Impact factor: 2.590

8.  Rats and seabirds: effects of egg size on predation risk and the potential of conditioned taste aversion as a mitigation method.

Authors:  Lucía Latorre; Asier R Larrinaga; Luis Santamaría
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-09-18       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Ultrasonic communication in rats: can playback of 50-kHz calls induce approach behavior?

Authors:  Markus Wöhr; Rainer K W Schwarting
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2007-12-26       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Predator odour but not TMT induces 22-kHz ultrasonic vocalizations in rats that lead to defensive behaviours in conspecifics upon replay.

Authors:  Markus Fendt; Marcel Brosch; Kerstin E A Wernecke; Maria Willadsen; Markus Wöhr
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-07-23       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.