Literature DB >> 24923635

Lessons learned during the development and transfer of technology related to a new Hib conjugate vaccine to emerging vaccine manufacturers.

A Hamidi1, C Boog2, S Jadhav3, H Kreeftenberg2.   

Abstract

The incidence of Haemophilus Influenzae type b (Hib) disease in developed countries has decreased since the introduction of Hib conjugate vaccines in their National Immunization Programs (NIP). In countries where Hib vaccination is not applied routinely, due to limited availability and high cost of the vaccines, invasive Hib disease is still a cause of mortality. Through the development of a production process for a Hib conjugate vaccine and related quality control tests and the transfer of this technology to emerging vaccine manufacturers in developing countries, a substantial contribution was made to the availability and affordability of Hib conjugate vaccines in these countries. Technology transfer is considered to be one of the fastest ways to get access to the technology needed for the production of vaccines. The first Hib conjugate vaccine based on the transferred technology was licensed in 2007, since then more Hib vaccines based on this technology were licensed. This paper describes the successful development and transfer of Hib conjugate vaccine technology to vaccine manufacturers in India, China and Indonesia. By describing the lessons learned in this process, it is hoped that other technology transfer projects can benefit from the knowledge and experience gained.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Haemophilus Influenzae type b; Lessons learned; Technology transfer developing countries vaccine manufacturers; Vaccine

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24923635     DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2014.05.023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vaccine        ISSN: 0264-410X            Impact factor:   3.641


  7 in total

1.  Technology transfer of oil-in-water emulsion adjuvant manufacturing for pandemic influenza vaccine production in Romania: Preclinical evaluation of split virion inactivated H5N1 vaccine with adjuvant.

Authors:  Crina Stavaru; Adrian Onu; Emilia Lupulescu; Catalin Tucureanu; Orhan Rasid; Ene Vlase; Cristin Coman; Iuliana Caras; Alina Ghiorghisor; Laurentiu Berbecila; Vlad Tofan; Richard A Bowen; Nicole Marlenee; Airn Hartwig; Helle Bielefeldt-Ohmann; Susan L Baldwin; Neal Van Hoeven; Thomas S Vedvick; Chuong Huynh; Michael K O'Hara; Diana L Noah; Christopher B Fox
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2015-11-30       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 2.  Hib Vaccines: Past, Present, and Future Perspectives.

Authors:  Adi Essam Zarei; Hussein A Almehdar; Elrashdy M Redwan
Journal:  J Immunol Res       Date:  2016-01-20       Impact factor: 4.818

Review 3.  An updated methodology to review developing-country vaccine manufacturer viability.

Authors:  Nicholas Luter; Ritu Kumar; Dai Hozumi; Tina Lorenson; Shannon Larsen; Bhavya Gowda; Amie Batson
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2017-06-09       Impact factor: 3.641

4.  Vaccine innovation model: A technology transfer perspective in pandemic contexts.

Authors:  Maurício Z Medeiros; Priscila F Soares; Beatriz C Fialho; Leandro Gauss; Fábio S Piran; Daniel P Lacerda
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2022-06-27       Impact factor: 4.169

Review 5.  Why might regional vaccinology networks fail? The case of the Dutch-Nordic Consortium.

Authors:  Jan Hendriks; Stuart Blume
Journal:  Global Health       Date:  2016-07-07       Impact factor: 4.185

6.  Ambiguous Capture: Collaborative Capitalism and the Meningitis Vaccine Project.

Authors:  Janice Graham
Journal:  Med Anthropol       Date:  2016-03-30

Review 7.  The Ebola Vaccine Team B: a model for promoting the rapid development of medical countermeasures for emerging infectious disease threats.

Authors:  Michael Osterholm; Kristine Moore; Julie Ostrowsky; Kathleen Kimball-Baker; Jeremy Farrar
Journal:  Lancet Infect Dis       Date:  2015-10-30       Impact factor: 25.071

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.