Literature DB >> 24923431

The relationship between feed efficiency and the circadian profile of blood plasma analytes measured in beef heifers at different physiological stages.

C V Gonano1, Y R Montanholi1, F S Schenkel1, B A Smith1, J P Cant1, S P Miller1.   

Abstract

The characterization of blood metabolite concentrations over the circadian period and across physiological stages is important for understanding the biological basis of feed efficiency, and may culminate in indirect methods for assessing feed efficiency. Hematological analyses for albumin, urea, creatine kinase, glutamate dehydrogenase, aspartate aminotransferase, carbon dioxide, and acetate were carried out in growing and gestating heifers. These measures were carried out in a sample of 36 Bos taurus crossed beef heifers held under the same husbandry conditions. Hourly blood samples were collected over a 24-h period on three separate sampling occasions, corresponding approximately to the yearling (and open), early-gestation and late-gestation stages. This design was used to determine variation throughout the day, effects due to physiological status and any associations with feed efficiency, as measured by residual feed intake. Blood analyte levels varied with time of day, with the most variation occurring between 0800 and 1600 h. There were also considerable differences in analyte levels across the three physiological stages; for example, creatine kinase was higher (P<0.05) in open heifers, followed by early- and late-gestation heifers. Feed efficiency was also associated with analyte abundance. In more feed-efficient open heifers, there were higher activities of creatine kinase (P<0.05) and aspartate aminotransferase (P<0.05), and lower concentrations of carbon dioxide (P<0.05). Furthermore, in late gestation, more efficient heifers had lower urea concentrations (P<0.05) and lower creatine kinase levels (P<0.05). Over the whole experimental period, carbon dioxide concentrations were numerically lower in more feed efficient heifers (P=0.079). Differences were also observed across physiological stages. For instance, open heifers had increased levels (P<0.05) of creatine kinase, aspartate aminotransferase, carbon dioxide than early and late pregnancy heifers. In essence, this study revealed relevant information about the metabolic profile in the context of feed efficiency and physiological stages. Further optimization of our approach, along with the evaluation of complementary analytes, will aid in the development of robust, indirect assessments of feed efficiency.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24923431     DOI: 10.1017/S1751731114001463

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Animal        ISSN: 1751-7311            Impact factor:   3.240


  5 in total

1.  Enhanced expression of proteins involved in energy production and transfer in breast muscle of pedigree male broilers exhibiting high feed efficiency.

Authors:  W G Bottje; K Lassiter; S Dridi; N Hudson; B-W Kong
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2017-07-01       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Liver morphometrics and metabolic blood profile across divergent phenotypes for feed efficiency in the bovine.

Authors:  Yuri Regis Montanholi; Livia Sadocco Haas; Kendall Carl Swanson; Brenda Lynn Coomber; Shigeto Yamashiro; Stephen Paul Miller
Journal:  Acta Vet Scand       Date:  2017-04-26       Impact factor: 1.695

3.  Plasma Carboxyl-Metabolome Is Associated with Average Daily Gain Divergence in Beef Steers.

Authors:  Ibukun Ogunade; Adeoye Oyebade; Bremansu Osa-Andrews; Sunday Peters
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-01-01       Impact factor: 2.752

4.  Associations of Blood Analysis with Feed Efficiency and Developmental Stage in Grass-Fed Beef Heifers.

Authors:  Nara R B Cônsolo; Jasper C Munro; Stéphanie L Bourgon; Niel A Karrow; Alan H Fredeen; Janel E Martell; Yuri R Montanholi
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2018-08-02       Impact factor: 2.752

5.  GWAS and eQTL analysis identifies a SNP associated with both residual feed intake and GFRA2 expression in beef cattle.

Authors:  Marc G Higgins; Claire Fitzsimons; Matthew C McClure; Clare McKenna; Stephen Conroy; David A Kenny; Mark McGee; Sinéad M Waters; Derek W Morris
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-09-24       Impact factor: 4.379

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.