Literature DB >> 24923221

Long-term outcomes after intersphincteric resection for low-lying rectal cancer.

Norio Saito1, Masaaki Ito, Akihiro Kobayashi, Yusuke Nishizawa, Motohiro Kojima, Yuji Nishizawa, Masanori Sugito.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: As an anus-preserving surgery for very low rectal cancer, intersphincteric resection (ISR), has advanced markedly over the last 20 years. We investigated long-term oncologic, functional, and quality of life (QOL) outcomes after ISR with or without partial external sphincter resection (PESR).
METHODS: A series of 199 patients underwent curative ISR with or without PESR between 2000 and 2008, with 49 receiving preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT group) and 150 undergoing surgery first (surgery group). Overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and local relapse-free survival (LFS) rates were calculated using Kaplan-Meier methods. Functional outcomes were assessed using the Wexner incontinence score. QOL was investigated using the Short-Form 36 questionnaire (SF-36) and modified fecal incontinence quality of life (mFIQL) scale.
RESULTS: After a median follow-up of 78 months (range 12-164 months), estimated 7-year OS, DFS, and LFS rates were 78, 67, and 80 %, respectively. LFS was better in the CRT group than in the surgery group (p = 0.045). Patients with PESR or positive circumferential resection margins showed significantly worse survival. The median Wexner incontinence score at >5 years was 8 in the surgery group and 10 in the CRT group (p = 0.01). QOL was improved in all physical and mental subscales of the SF-36 at >5 years. Although the mFIQL showed a relatively good score in all groups at >5 years, a significant difference existed between the CRT and surgery groups (p = 0.008).
CONCLUSIONS: With long-term follow-up, oncologic, functional, and QOL results after ISR appear acceptable, although CRT is associated with disturbance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24923221     DOI: 10.1245/s10434-014-3762-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol        ISSN: 1068-9265            Impact factor:   5.344


  30 in total

1.  Outcomes of ultra-low anterior resection combined with or without intersphincteric resection in lower rectal cancer patients.

Authors:  Jin C Kim; Chang S Yu; Seok-B Lim; Chan W Kim; In J Park; Yong S Yoon
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2015-07-05       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  The influence of specific technical maneuvers utilized in the creation of diverting loop-ileostomies on stoma-related morbidity.

Authors:  Masaaki Miyo; Ichiro Takemasa; Masataka Ikeda; Masaki Tujie; Junichi Hasegawa; Masayuki Ohue; Takeshi Kato; Tsunekazu Mizushima; Yuichiro Doki; Masaki Mori
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2017-03-09       Impact factor: 2.549

3.  A novel transanal tube designed to prevent anastomotic leakage after rectal cancer surgery: the WING DRAIN.

Authors:  Hideaki Nishigori; Masaaki Ito; Yuji Nishizawa
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2016-08-09       Impact factor: 2.549

4.  Comparison of the clinical results of abdominoperanal intersphincteric resection and abdominoperineal resection for lower rectal cancer.

Authors:  Shunsuke Tsukamoto; Yukihide Kanemitsu; Dai Shida; Hiroki Ochiai; Junichi Mazaki
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2017-01-16       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  Sphincter-Preserving Surgery for Low Rectal Cancer: Do We Overshoot the Mark?

Authors:  Johannes Klose; Ignazio Tarantino; Yakup Kulu; Thomas Bruckner; Stefan Trefz; Thomas Schmidt; Martin Schneider; Thilo Hackert; Markus W Büchler; Alexis Ulrich
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2016-12-15       Impact factor: 3.452

6.  A comparison of the long-term anorectal function between laparoscopic intersphincteric resection and low anterior resection for low rectal cancer.

Authors:  Kenji Kawada; Koya Hida; Suguru Hasegawa; Yoshiharu Sakai
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2018-05-11       Impact factor: 2.549

Review 7.  Surgical Options in the Treatment of Lower Gastrointestinal Tract Cancers.

Authors:  Andrea S Porpiglia; Elin R Sigurdson
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2015-09

8.  The Impact of Anastomotic Leakage on Anal Function Following Intersphincteric Resection.

Authors:  Mitsuru Yokota; Masaaki Ito; Yuji Nishizawa; Akihiro Kobayashi; Norio Saito
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 3.352

9.  Effectiveness of Pelvic Floor Rehabilitation for Bowel Dysfunction After Intersphincteric Resection for Lower Rectal Cancer.

Authors:  Hideaki Nishigori; Masayuki Ishii; Yujiro Kokado; Kouji Fujimoto; Hiroshi Higashiyama
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 3.352

10.  Necessary circumferential resection margins to prevent rectal cancer relapse after abdomino-peranal (intersphincteric) resection.

Authors:  Koji Komori; Kenya Kimura; Takashi Kinoshita; Seiji Ito; Tetsuya Abe; Yoshiki Senda; Kazunari Misawa; Yuichi Ito; Norihisa Uemura; Seiji Natsume; Ryosuke Kawai; Yasuhiro Shimizu
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2016-02-17       Impact factor: 3.445

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.