Literature DB >> 24922501

Continuous closed-loop decoder adaptation with a recursive maximum likelihood algorithm allows for rapid performance acquisition in brain-machine interfaces.

Siddharth Dangi1, Suraj Gowda, Helene G Moorman, Amy L Orsborn, Kelvin So, Maryam Shanechi, Jose M Carmena.   

Abstract

Closed-loop decoder adaptation (CLDA) is an emerging paradigm for both improving and maintaining online performance in brain-machine interfaces (BMIs). The time required for initial decoder training and any subsequent decoder recalibrations could be potentially reduced by performing continuous adaptation, in which decoder parameters are updated at every time step during these procedures, rather than waiting to update the decoder at periodic intervals in a more batch-based process. Here, we present recursive maximum likelihood (RML), a CLDA algorithm that performs continuous adaptation of a Kalman filter decoder's parameters. We demonstrate that RML possesses a variety of useful properties and practical algorithmic advantages. First, we show how RML leverages the accuracy of updates based on a batch of data while still adapting parameters on every time step. Second, we illustrate how the RML algorithm is parameterized by a single, intuitive half-life parameter that can be used to adjust the rate of adaptation in real time. Third, we show how even when the number of neural features is very large, RML's memory-efficient recursive update rules can be reformulated to also be computationally fast so that continuous adaptation is still feasible. To test the algorithm in closed-loop experiments, we trained three macaque monkeys to perform a center-out reaching task by using either spiking activity or local field potentials to control a 2D computer cursor. RML achieved higher levels of performance more rapidly in comparison to a previous CLDA algorithm that adapts parameters on a more intermediate timescale. Overall, our results indicate that RML is an effective CLDA algorithm for achieving rapid performance acquisition using continuous adaptation.

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24922501     DOI: 10.1162/NECO_a_00632

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neural Comput        ISSN: 0899-7667            Impact factor:   2.026


  8 in total

1.  Neurophysiology. Decoding motor imagery from the posterior parietal cortex of a tetraplegic human.

Authors:  Tyson Aflalo; Spencer Kellis; Christian Klaes; Brian Lee; Ying Shi; Kelsie Pejsa; Kathleen Shanfield; Stephanie Hayes-Jackson; Mindy Aisen; Christi Heck; Charles Liu; Richard A Andersen
Journal:  Science       Date:  2015-05-22       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Brain-computer interface control along instructed paths.

Authors:  P T Sadtler; S I Ryu; E C Tyler-Kabara; B M Yu; A P Batista
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2015-01-21       Impact factor: 5.379

Review 3.  The science and engineering behind sensitized brain-controlled bionic hands.

Authors:  Chethan Pandarinath; Sliman J Bensmaia
Journal:  Physiol Rev       Date:  2021-09-20       Impact factor: 37.312

4.  Encoder-decoder optimization for brain-computer interfaces.

Authors:  Josh Merel; Donald M Pianto; John P Cunningham; Liam Paninski
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2015-06-01       Impact factor: 4.475

5.  Optimizing the learning rate for adaptive estimation of neural encoding models.

Authors:  Han-Lin Hsieh; Maryam M Shanechi
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2018-05-29       Impact factor: 4.475

6.  Robust Brain-Machine Interface Design Using Optimal Feedback Control Modeling and Adaptive Point Process Filtering.

Authors:  Maryam M Shanechi; Amy L Orsborn; Jose M Carmena
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2016-04-01       Impact factor: 4.475

7.  Neuroprosthetic Decoder Training as Imitation Learning.

Authors:  Josh Merel; David Carlson; Liam Paninski; John P Cunningham
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2016-05-18       Impact factor: 4.475

Review 8.  A Review of Control Strategies in Closed-Loop Neuroprosthetic Systems.

Authors:  James Wright; Vaughan G Macefield; André van Schaik; Jonathan C Tapson
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2016-07-12       Impact factor: 4.677

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.