Bart Klijs1, Wilma J Nusselder, Caspar W Looman, Johan P Mackenbach. 1. At the time of the study, Bart Klijs, Wilma J. Nusselder, Caspar W. Looman, and Johan P. Mackenbach were with the Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, The Netherlands. Bart Klijs was also with the Department of Epidemiology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, The Netherlands.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: We assessed the contributions of the prevalence and disabling impact of specific diseases to educational disparities in the prevalence of disability. METHODS: We examined a large representative survey of the Dutch population, the Dutch Permanent Survey of Living Conditions (2001-2007; n = 24 883; ages 40-97 years). We attributed the prevalence of disability to chronic diseases by using their empirical associations and assuming independent competing causes of disability. We estimated contributions of prevalence and the disabling impact of diseases to disparities in disability using counterfactuals. RESULTS: We found that the prevalence of disability in individuals with only an elementary education was 19 to 20 percentage points higher than that in individuals with tertiary education. Sixty-five percent of this difference could be attributed to specific chronic diseases, but more so to their disabling impact (49%-51%) than to their prevalence (20%-29%). Back pain, neck or arm conditions, and peripheral vascular disease contributed most to the disparity in men, and arthritis, back pain, and chronic nonspecific lung disease contributed most to the disparity in women. CONCLUSIONS: Educational disparities in the burden of disability were primarily caused by high disabling impacts of chronic diseases among low educated groups. Tackling disparities might require more effective treatment or rehabilitation of disability in lower socioeconomic groups.
OBJECTIVES: We assessed the contributions of the prevalence and disabling impact of specific diseases to educational disparities in the prevalence of disability. METHODS: We examined a large representative survey of the Dutch population, the Dutch Permanent Survey of Living Conditions (2001-2007; n = 24 883; ages 40-97 years). We attributed the prevalence of disability to chronic diseases by using their empirical associations and assuming independent competing causes of disability. We estimated contributions of prevalence and the disabling impact of diseases to disparities in disability using counterfactuals. RESULTS: We found that the prevalence of disability in individuals with only an elementary education was 19 to 20 percentage points higher than that in individuals with tertiary education. Sixty-five percent of this difference could be attributed to specific chronic diseases, but more so to their disabling impact (49%-51%) than to their prevalence (20%-29%). Back pain, neck or arm conditions, and peripheral vascular disease contributed most to the disparity in men, and arthritis, back pain, and chronic nonspecific lung disease contributed most to the disparity in women. CONCLUSIONS: Educational disparities in the burden of disability were primarily caused by high disabling impacts of chronic diseases among low educated groups. Tackling disparities might require more effective treatment or rehabilitation of disability in lower socioeconomic groups.
Authors: Annemarie Koster; Brenda W J H Penninx; Hans Bosma; Gertrudis I J M Kempen; Tamara B Harris; Anne B Newman; Ronica N Rooks; Susan M Rubin; Eleanor M Simonsick; Jacques T M van Eijk; Stephen B Kritchevsky Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2005-08 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: Johan P Mackenbach; Vivian Bos; Otto Andersen; Mario Cardano; Giuseppe Costa; Seeromanie Harding; Alison Reid; Orjan Hemström; Tapani Valkonen; Anton E Kunst Journal: Int J Epidemiol Date: 2003-10 Impact factor: 7.196
Authors: Carolien L van den Brink; Marja Tijhuis; Sandra Kalmijn; Niek S Klazinga; Aulikki Nissinen; Simona Giampaoli; Paula Kivinen; Daan Kromhout; Geertrudis A M van den Bos Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2003-06 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Annemarie Koster; Hans Bosma; Marjolein I Broese van Groenou; Gertrudis I J M Kempen; Brenda W J H Penninx; Jacques Th M van Eijk; Dorly J H Deeg Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2006-10-05 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Renata T C Yokota; Nicolas Berger; Wilma J Nusselder; Jean-Marie Robine; Jean Tafforeau; Patrick Deboosere; Herman Van Oyen Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2015-03-07 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Renata T C Yokota; Johan Van der Heyden; Stefaan Demarest; Jean Tafforeau; Willma J Nusselder; Patrick Deboosere; Herman Van Oyen Journal: Arch Public Health Date: 2015-08-03
Authors: Aline Flatz; Alejandra Casillas; Silvia Stringhini; Emilie Zuercher; Bernard Burnand; Isabelle Peytremann-Bridevaux Journal: Int J Gen Med Date: 2015-02-25
Authors: Renata Tiene de Carvalho Yokota; Wilma Johanna Nusselder; Jean-Marie Robine; Jean Tafforeau; Patrick Deboosere; Herman Van Oyen Journal: PLoS One Date: 2016-04-22 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Clémence Palazzo; Renata T C Yokota; Jean Tafforeau; Jean-François Ravaud; Emmanuelle Cambois; Serge Poiraudeau; Herman Van Oyen; Wilma J Nusselder Journal: Arch Public Health Date: 2019-01-11
Authors: Renata T C Yokota; Wilma J Nusselder; Jean-Marie Robine; Jean Tafforeau; Patrick Deboosere; Lenildo Moura; Silvânia S C A Andrade; Shamyr S Castro; Herman Van Oyen Journal: Arch Public Health Date: 2017-12-18