Structurally diverse MDM2-p53 antagonists act as modulators of MDR-1 function in neuroblastoma.

BACKGROUND: A frequent mechanism of acquired multidrug resistance in human cancers is overexpression of ATP-binding cassette transporters such as the Multi-Drug Resistance Protein 1 (MDR-1). Nutlin-3, an MDM2-p53 antagonist, has previously been reported to be a competitive MDR-1 inhibitor.
METHODS: This study assessed whether the structurally diverse MDM2-p53 antagonists, MI-63, NDD0005, and RG7388 are also able to modulate MDR-1 function, particularly in p53 mutant neuroblastoma cells, using XTT-based cell viability assays, western blotting, and liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry analysis.
RESULTS: Verapamil and the MDM2-p53 antagonists potentiated vincristine-mediated growth inhibition in a concentration-dependent manner when used in combination with high MDR-1-expressing p53 mutant neuroblastoma cell lines at concentrations that did not affect the viability of cells when given alone. Liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry analyses showed that verapamil, Nutlin-3, MI-63 and NDD0005, but not RG7388, led to increased intracellular levels of vincristine in high MDR-1-expressing cell lines.
CONCLUSIONS: These results show that in addition to Nutlin-3, other structurally unrelated MDM2-p53 antagonists can also act as MDR-1 inhibitors and reverse MDR-1-mediated multidrug resistance in neuroblastoma cell lines in a p53-independent manner. These findings are important for future clinical trial design with MDM2-p53 antagonists when used in combination with agents that are MDR-1 substrates.

MDM2–p53 antagonists are a novel class of anticancer agents that are currently in preclinical and/or early-phase clinical evaluation for the treatment of both haematological and solid malignancies. This class includes cis-imidazolines, spiro-oxindoles, benzodiazepinediones, isoindolinones, isoquinolinones and thiophenes that act by disrupting the interaction between p53 and its critical negative regulator MDM2 to reactivate wild-type (wt) p53 (Chen and Tweddle, 2012; Miyazaki ). Nutlins were the first potent and selective inhibitors of the MDM2–p53 interaction (Vassilev ), in particular Nutlin-3 has been extensively evaluated in vitro and in vivo in several types of human cancers, including neuroblastoma (reviewed by (Chen and Tweddle, 2012)). Overall, MDM2–p53 antagonists have been shown to activate the p53 pathway, triggering p53-dependent cell cycle arrest and/or apoptosis, while inducing a reversible cell cycle arrest in normal cells (Cheok ; Vassilev, 2004).

Hoffmann-La Roche were the first to report potent and selective small molecule MDM2–p53 binding antagonists, establishing in vitro and in vivo proof of efficacy as anticancer agents with the cis-imidazoline (Nutlin) compound series (Vassilev ). Subsequently, Hoffman–La Roche have developed alternative compound series with more suitable in vivo properties and have been the first pharmaceutical company to enter their lead candidates ((RG7112 (R05045337) and RG7388 (R05503781)) in clinical trials, evaluating them both as single agents and also in combination with doxorubicin (www.clinicaltrials.gov; NCT01462175, NCT01677780 and NCT01605526; Ray-Coquard ). More recently, lead candidates of this class from other pharmaceutical companies such as Daiichi Sankyo (Tokyo, Japan) (www.clinicaltrials.gov; NCT01877382), Amgen (Thousand Oaks, CA, USA) (www.clinicaltrials.gov; NCT01723020, NCT02016729), Sanofi (Paris, France)/Merck KGaA (Darmstadt, Germany) (www.clinicaltrials.gov; NCT01636479, NCT01985191) and Novartis (Cambridge, MA, USA) (www.clinicaltrials.gov; NCT01760525, NCT02143635) have entered early-phase trials as single agents and in combination.

To date, several p53-independent functions of Nutlin-3 have also been reported, including disruption of the MDM2–p73 interaction (Lau ), sensitising p53-deficient chemoresistant cells to chemotherapy-induced apoptosis via upregulation of TAp73 and E2F1 (Ambrosini ; Peirce and Findley, 2009), as well as acting as a competitive Multi-Drug Resistance Protein 1 (MDR-1) inhibitor and reversing MDR-1-mediated drug resistance (Michaelis ).

Acquired multidrug resistance is a major challenge in the successful treatment of cancers and can occur by increased expression of ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporters, such as MDR-1, a 170-kDa transmembrane efflux pump encoded by the MDR-1 (ABCB1) gene. MDR-1-mediated efflux of chemotherapeutics out of the cell leads to decreased intracellular concentrations and reduced drug efficacy. Overexpression of MDR-1 has been shown to confer resistance to chemotherapies such as vinca alkaloids, anthracyclines and taxanes. Modulating ABC transporter activity to restore sensitivity and overcome multidrug resistance has been well studied. To date, several compounds including verapamil and cyclosporine have been shown to inhibit MDR-1 function and some of these have entered clinical trials (Yu ).

Neuroblastoma is a rare embryonal malignancy of the sympathetic nervous system that accounts for 15% of childhood cancer-related mortality (Park ). Over 50% of patients present with high-risk metastatic disease at the time of diagnosis, and despite an initial response to intensive multimodal therapy, relapse with chemoresistant disease is common. The overall long-term survival of high-risk patients is currently less than 50%, with those that survive often having long-term toxicities. Previous studies have found high MDR-1 expression in neuroblastoma, and in some reports this was shown to have prognostic importance (Chan ; Benard ; Haber ; de Cremoux ; Oue ).

Using p53 mutant and wt neuroblastoma cell lines established at relapse as a model of chemoresistant disease, the present study aimed to assess whether structurally diverse MDM2–p53 antagonists, namely Nutlin-3 (cis-imidazoline), NDD0005 (isoindolinone), MI-63 (spiro-oxindole) and RG7388 (pyrrolidine) (Ding ; Watson ; Ding ) are able to act as MDR-1 inhibitors and sensitise cells to vincristine-induced cytotoxicity. A greater understanding of the properties of this class of novel cancer therapeutics will facilitate their future design, clinical development and incorporation into current treatment regimens for patients with neuroblastoma and other cancers.

Materials and methods

Chemicals and ELISA-based MDM2–p53-binding screening

Nutlin-3 was purchased from Enzo Life Sciences Ltd (Exeter, UK). RG7388 was a gift from Roche-Genentech (Nutley, NJ, USA; Ding ). MI-63 was synthesised as previously described (Ding ), as was NDD0005 (Watson ). The concentration of the latter compounds required to inhibit the binding between MDM2 and p53 by 50% (IC50 values) was determined using an ELISA-based method as previously described (Hardcastle ). The chemical structures and IC50 values of the MDM2–p53 antagonists are shown in Figure 1A. Vincristine, cisplatin and doxorubicin were all purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (Dorset, UK). Verapamil was purchased from Calbiochem (Merck KGaA) and dissolved in sterile distilled water. Cisplatin was dissolved in dimethylformamide, and all other drugs were dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO).

Figure 1

The chemical structures of MDM2-p53 antagonists Nutlin-3, NDD0005, MI-63, and RG7388, and MDR-1 expression in a panel of neuroblastoma cell lines established at relapse. (A) The chemical structures and corresponding IC50 values of Nutlin-3, NDD0005, MI-63 and RG7388. *This is the IC50 value for the active enantiomer Nutlin-3a. (B) Western blot analysis showing the expression levels of MDR-1, p53 and MYCN in p53 mutant (SKNBe2C, LAN1, SKNAS and IGRN91) and wt (SHSY5Y) neuroblastoma cell lines. MDCKII-MDR-1 cells are stably transfected with human MDR-1 and were used as a positive control. Actin was used as a loading control.

Cell lines

Human neuroblastoma cell lines used were p53 mutant SKNBe2C, SKNAS, LAN1 and IGRN91 and p53 wt SHSY5Y cells. All cell lines were established post-chemotherapy and SKNBe2C, LAN1 and IGRN91 cells are MYCN-amplified (Chen and Tweddle, 2012). All neuroblastoma cell lines were obtained between 1996 and 2007 and were validated upon receipt using cytogenetic analysis courtesy of Dr Nick Bown (NHS Department of Cytogenetics, Institute of Genetic Medicine, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK). Madin–Darby canine kidney cell lines MDCKII-wt and MDCKII-MDR-1 were obtained from the originator Alfred Schinkel (Netherlands Cancer Institute). MDR-1 cells are stably transfected with human MDR-1 (Bakos ). Neuroblastoma cells were cultured in RPMI-1640 (Sigma-Aldrich) supplemented with 10% (v/v) FCS (Gibco, Life Technologies Ltd, Paisley, UK). Canine cells were cultured in DMEM supplemented with 10% FCS, 100 units ml−1 penicillin and 100 μg ml−1 streptomycin (Sigma-Aldrich). All cell lines were routinely tested for Mycoplasma and confirmed to be negative. Cells were maintained at 37 °C in a humidified incubator with 5% CO2.

Growth inhibition assays

Cells were seeded in 96-well plates (Corning, VWR International Ltd, Lutterworth, UK), allowed to adhere overnight before treatment with MDM2–p53 antagonists or chemotherapy agents alone, or in combination for 72 h. Growth inhibition was assessed using the XTT cell proliferation assay (Roche, Burgess Hill, UK) according to the manufacturer's instructions or sulforhodamine B (SRB) assays as previously described (Gamble ). GraphPad Prism v6.0 software (San Diego, CA, USA) was used to calculate GI50 values. For combination treatments, cells were treated with a fixed concentration of verapamil or MDM2–p53 antagonists together with varying concentrations of cytotoxic drugs for 72 h. Experiments were at least n=3.

Protein analysis

Whole-cell lysates were harvested as previously described (Tweddle ). Proteins were separated using 4–20% Mini-PROTEAN TGX Precast Gels (Bio-Rad Laboratories Ltd, Hemel Hempstead, UK) and transferred onto Hybond-C Extra membrane (GE Life Sciences, Little Chalfont, UK). Primary antibodies used were MDR-1 1 : 200 (Cat No.: sc-13131, Santa Cruz Biotechnology Inc., Dallas, TX, USA), p53 1 : 1000 (Cat No.: NCL-L-p53-DO7, Leica Microsystems Ltd, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK), MYCN 1 : 100 (Cat No.: OP13, Merck KGaA), cleaved caspase-3 1 : 1000 (Cat No.: 9664S, New England Biolabs Ltd, Hitchin, UK), actin 1 : 500 (Cat No.: A4700, Sigma-Aldrich) and GAPDH 1 : 500 (Cat No.: sc-25778, Santa Cruz Biotechnology Inc.). Secondary goat anti-mouse/rabbit HRP-conjugated antibodies (Cat No.: P0447/P0448, Dako, Glostrup, Denmark) were used at 1 : 1000. All antibodies were diluted in 5% milk/1 × TBS-tween (w/v). Protein detection was performed using enhanced chemiluminescence (GE Life Sciences) and X-ray film (Fujifilm, Bedford, UK).

Liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry (LC-MS)

Intracellular drug concentrations were measured using LC-MS. Cells were seeded at 4 × 105 cells per well in six-well plates (Corning), allowed to adhere overnight before treatment with 1 × or 5 × their respective 72-h GI50 concentrations of vincristine alone or in combination with 2 μM of verapamil, Nutlin-3, NDD0005, MI-63 or RG7388 for 8 h. After treatment, cells were harvested, lysed in 200 μl 100% methanol (Fisher Scientific, Loughborough, UK), centrifuged and the supernatant transferred into 2-ml glass vials with 0.4-ml glass inserts (Jaytee Biosciences Ltd, Kent, UK). Eight different concentration standards (0.0001–200 nM) were prepared in methanol. Samples were analysed using an API4000 LC/MS/MS System (AB SCIEX, Warrington, UK) with a Phenomenex Luna 3μ C8(2) column, 50 × 2 mm, (Phenomenex, Macclesfield, UK) and a previously validated LC-MS assay (Israels ). The mobile phase was 0.02 M ammonium acetate pH 5 (A) and 100% methanol (B). The flow rate was 400 μl min−1, with a starting composition of 80% A, which after 2 min changed in a linear manner over 5 min to 10% A. A 30-s gradient returned the composition to 80% A with a column equilibration time of 3.5 min. The injection volume was 10 μl. Data were analysed using Analyst software v1.5 (AB SCIEX). Experiments were at least n=3. Graphs were generated using GraphPad Prism v6.0 software.

Statistical analyses

All statistical tests were performed using GraphPad Prism v6.0 software and P<0.05 taken to be the level of statistical significance.

Results

MDR-1 expression and sensitivity to chemotherapy in p53 mutant neuroblastoma cell lines

Expression of MDR-1 protein was assessed in a panel of p53 mutant and wt neuroblastoma cell lines of varying MYCN status, and the MDCK cell lines (Figure 1B). MDCKII-wt and MDCKII-MDR-1 were included as a negative and a positive control for MDR-1 expression, respectively. MDCKII-MDR-1 cells that are stably transfected with human MDR-1 expressed very high levels of MDR-1 compared with MDCKII-wt cells. Three out of five neuroblastoma cell lines were found to express high levels of MDR-1; p53 mutant, MYCN-amplified SKNBe2C and IGNR91 cells, and p53 wt, non-MYCN-amplified SHSY5Y cells. The remaining two p53 mutant cell lines, MYCN-amplified LAN1 and non-MYCN-amplified SKNAS, expressed barely detectable levels of the MDR-1 protein. Consistent with previous reports and compared with p53 wt SHSY5Y cells, SKNBe2C cells expressed high levels of accumulated mutant p53 protein, attributed to a missense mutation at codon 135 (Tweddle ). No p53 protein expression was detected in LAN1 cells as a consequence of a nonsense mutation at codon 182 (Goldschneider ) and SKNAS cells expressed a truncated protein because of a deletion of codons 105–125 (Goldschneider ). In contrast, IGRN91 cells expressed a protein of greater than predicted molecular weight for wt protein owing to a duplication of exons 7–9 between exons 9 and 10, which results in an extra ∼321 nucleotides (Goldschneider ; Figure 1B).

Sensitivity to chemotherapeutic agents, vincristine and doxorubicin, previously reported to be MDR-1 substrates, was initially determined in p53 mutant neuroblastoma cell lines using XTT-based cell proliferation assays. The concentrations of cytotoxic drugs that led to 50% inhibition of growth compared with controls (GI50) after 72 h of treatment are shown in Table 1. In the tested cell lines, high MDR-1 expression was associated with resistance to vincristine and higher GI50 values (p53 mutant high MDR-1 expression vs p53 mutant low MDR-1 expression, P<0.05, unpaired t-test; Table 1). The impact of MDR-1 expression on doxorubicin sensitivity was not significant, and only low MDR-1-expressing LAN1 cells had a lower GI50 compared with the high MDR-1-expressing SKNBe2C and IGRN91 cells (Table 1).

Table 1

GI50 values for cytotoxic agents, verapamil and MDM2–p53 antagonists in p53 mutant and p53 wt neuroblastoma cell lines, and the paired MDCK cell lines

	72-h GI50
Cell line	Vincristine (nM)	Doxorubicin (nM)	Cisplatin (μM)	Verapamil (μM)	Nutlin-3 (μM)	NDD0005 (μM)	MI-63 (μM)	RG7388 (μM)
SKNBe2Ca	32.8±4.0	98.1±12.7	2.7±0.2	113.2±4.0	24.2±0.4	12.0±0.8	20.7±0.4	10.1±0.2
IGNR91a	24.3±1.7	105.4±4.6	ND	ND	23.7±1.8	ND	ND	ND
SKNAS	1.5±0.2	98.8±3.9	0.8±0.04	96.5±5.1	27.0±2.3	18.3±0.6	19.2±0.1	14.0±0.7
LAN1	2.3±0.2	51.4±4.0	ND	ND	27.3±3.0	ND	ND	ND
SHSY5Ya	8.2±0.6	30.7±2.7	0.7±0.1	119.2±2.7	0.7±0.1	1.7±0.2	1.1±0.1	0.04±0.004
MDCKII-wt	ND	ND	ND	ND	7.2±3.3	7.1±1.7	4.8±3.0	0.15±0.04
MDCKII-MDR-1	ND	ND	ND	ND	16±6.2	6.1±1.1	5.1±2.4	0.24±0.04

Abbreviations: MDR-1=Multi-Drug Resistance Protein 1; ND=not determined.

Cell lines with intrinsic high MDR-1 expression.

Expression of ABC transporter MRP-1 has also previously been linked to resistance to chemotherapies (Szakacs ); however, analysis of MRP-1 protein expression in the panel of cell lines used in this study demonstrated that there was no clear difference in MRP-1 expression between the cell lines (Supplementary Figure 1).

Nutlin-3 sensitises high MDR-1-expressing p53 mutant cells to vincristine but not cisplatin

From Table 1, p53 mutant high MDR-1-expressing SKNBe2C and low MDR-1-expressing SKNAS cells were selected for further studies. Verapamil is a calcium channel blocker that has previously been shown to modulate MDR-1-mediated efflux of vincristine and was used as a positive control (Tsuruo ). Previous findings showing that Nutlin-3 sensitises p53 mutant MDR-1-overexpressing cells to vincristine (Michaelis ) were confirmed by testing the sensitivity of SKNBe2C and SKNAS cells to vincristine alone and in combination with 1, 2 or 5 μM verapamil or Nutlin-3 using XTT assays. The concentrations of verapamil or Nutlin-3 used did not affect the viability or proliferation of the p53 mutant neuroblastoma cells when used as single agents (data not shown). As expected, the results demonstrated that verapamil sensitises high MDR-1-expressing SKNBe2C cells in a concentration-dependent manner to vincristine (Figure 2A). At 1, 2 and 5 μM, verapamil significantly reduced the GI50 of vincristine in SKNBe2C cells by 10.5-, 19.9- and 38.2-fold (P<0.05, paired t-test), respectively (Figure 2A and Table 2). No significant reduction in GI50 was observed in low MDR-1-expressing SKNAS cells (Figure 2B and Table 2). Similarly, Nutlin-3 was found to sensitise SKNBe2C cells but not SKNAS cells to vincristine in a concentration-dependent manner (Figure 2C and D). In SKNBe2C cells at 1, 2 and 5 μM Nutlin-3, the GI50 of vincristine was significantly reduced by 2.1-, 13.7- and 43.7-fold (P<0.05, paired t-test), respectively (Figure 2C and Table 2). In contrast, there was no significant reduction in the GI50 of vincristine in SKNAS cells (1.2- to 1.3-fold; Figure 2D and Table 2).

Figure 2

Nutlin-3 sensitises high MDR-1-expressing p53 mutant neuroblastoma cell lines to vincristine but not cisplatin in a concentration-dependent manner. Sensitivity of high MDR-1-expressing SKNBe2C (A, C) and low MDR-1-expressing SKNAS cells (B, D) to treatment for 72 h with vincristine alone or in combination with 1, 2, or 5 μM verapamil or Nutlin-3, and (E) SKNBe2C and (F) SKNAS cells to treatment for 72 h with cisplatin alone or in combination with 1, 2 or 5 μM Nutlin-3. Data are shown as the average of at least three independent experiments and error bars represent s.e.m.

Table 2

GI50 values for vincristine in the presence of verapamil, Nutlin-3, NDD0005, MI-63 and RG7388 in p53 mutant high MDR-1-expressing SKNBe2C and low MDR-1-expressing SKNAS, and p53 wt high MDR-1-expressing SHSY5Y neuroblastoma cells and the fold potentiation relative to vincristine alone

		72 h GI50 of vincristine (nM)			Fold potentiation
Compound	Cell line	1 μM/0.25 × a	2 μM/0.5 × a	5 μM/1 × a	1 μM/0.25 × a	2 μM/0.5 × a	5 μM/1 × a
	SKNBe2C	4.2±0.6	2.2±0.3	1.1±0.2	10.5	19.9	38.2
					P<0.05	P<0.05	P<0.05
Verapamil	SKNAS	1.2±0.1	1.1±0.1	0.9±0.1	1.1	1.1	1.3
					P=0.259	P=0.185	P=0.121
	SHSY5Y	0.5±0.2	0.2±0.1	<0.1 nM	10.2	21.8	>50
					P<0.001	P<0.001	P<0.001
	SKNBe2C	20.1±6.2	3.1±1.5	1.0±0.2	2.1	13.7	43.7
					P<0.05	P<0.005	P<0.005
Nutlin-3	SKNAS	1.4±0.3	1.5±0.6	1.5±0.7	1.3	1.2	1.2
					P=0.321	P=0.109	P=0.225
	SHSY5Y	2.4±0.2	1.9±0.4	1.4±0.3	2.1	2.8	3.7
					P<0.05	P<0.05	P<0.01
	SKNBe2C	2.2±0.5	1.2±0.2	0.7±0.2	13.0	23.5	42.4
					P<0.05	P<0.05	P<0.05
NDD0005	SKNAS	1.0±0.1	0.8±0.1	< 0.1	1.2	1.4	ND
					P=0.1	P<0.05	ND
	SHSY5Y	2.3±0.7	0.5±0.1	0.2±0.1	2.4	12.0	33.1
					P<0.05	P<0.05	P<0.05
	SKNBe2C	22.8±3.2	3.1±0.6	1.0±0.1	1.92	13.9	44.4
					P<0.001	P<0.01	P<0.01
MI-63	SKNAS	1.1±0.2	1.0±0.1	0.9±0.1	1.2	1.3	1.4
					P=0.664	P=0.377	P=0.242
	SHSY5Y	3.9±0.8	1.8±0.6	0.6±0.1	1.3	2.9	9.5
					P=0.096	P<0.001	P<0.01
	SKNBe2C	14.6±2.2	18.8±2.2	2±0.3	1.8	1.4	13.3
					P=0.073	P=0.39	P=0.052
RG7388	SKNAS	1.2±0.1	1±0.002	0.9±0.1	1.0	1.1	1.2
					P=0.532	P=0.078	P=0.06
	SHSY5Y	2.6±0.4	2.3±0.2	1.1±0.5	2.0	2.2	4.8
					P<0.05	P<0.05	P<0.01

Abbreviations: MDR-1=Multi-Drug Resistance Protein 1; ND=not determined.

Values represent average±s.e.m.

For p53 mutant cells, verapamil, Nutlin-3, NDD0005, MI-63 and RG7388 were used at 1, 2 and 5 μM in combination with vincristine. For p53 wt cells, verapamil was used at 1, 2 and 5 μM in combination with vincristine, whereas Nutlin-3, NDD0005, MI-63 and RG7388 were used in combination at 0.25 × , 0.5 × and 1 × GI50 concentrations.

The response of high MDR-1-expressing p53 wt SHSY5Y cells to vincristine alone and in combination with verapamil or Nutlin-3 was also assessed. Verapamil was used at 1, 2 and 5 μM and did not affect the viability or proliferation of SHSY5Y cells; however, Nutlin-3 was used in combination at 0.25 × , 0.5 × and 1 × 72-h GI50 concentrations because of the sensitivity of SHSY5Y cells to Nutlin-3 as a result of their wt p53 status. In the presence of 1, 2 and 5 μM of verapamil, the GI50 of vincristine was significantly reduced by 10.2-, 21.8- and >50-fold (P<0.01, paired t-test), respectively (Supplementary Figure 2A and Table 2). In addition, the results showed that, although Nutlin-3 treatment led to a slight concentration-dependent sensitisation to vincristine, the magnitude was not as large as observed in SKNBe2C cells (Supplementary Figure 2B and Table 2). The reduced potentiation of vincristine by Nutlin-3 in SHSY5Y cells is most likely due to the lower concentrations of Nutlin-3 used (that is, <1 μM) compared with the p53 mutant cell lines (1–5 μM).

To provide further support that potentiation by Nutlin-3 was because of abrogation of MDR-1-mediated resistance to vincristine, the above experiments were repeated using cisplatin, a cytotoxic agent that is not an MDR-1 substrate (Breier ). The results demonstrated that, as expected, Nutlin-3 did not sensitise high MDR-1-expressing SKNBe2C cells or low MDR-1-expressing SKNAS cells to cisplatin (Figures 2E and F, that is, less than 2-fold change in the GI50, Supplementary Table 1).

MDM2 antagonists Nutlin-3, NDD0005 and MI-63 sensitise high MDR-1-expressing cells to vincristine-mediated cytotoxicity

The ability of the structurally diverse MDM2–p53 antagonists NDD0005 (isoindolinone), MI-63 (spiro-oxindole) and RG7388 (pyrrolidine) to sensitise high MDR-1-expressing cells to vincristine in a concentration-dependent manner was then assessed. NDD0005 and MI-63 were both shown to sensitise SKNBe2C cells to vincristine in a concentration-dependent manner (Figure 3A and B). At 1, 2 and 5 μM, NDD0005 significantly reduced the GI50 of vincristine by 13.0-, 23.5- and 42.4-fold (P<0.05, paired t-test), respectively, and MI-63 by 1.9-, 13.- and 44.4-fold (P<0.01, paired t-test), respectively (Figures 3A and B and Table 2). In contrast, RG7388 at 1 and 2 μM did not significantly reduce the GI50 of vincristine in the same cells; however, 5 μM RG7388 did potentiate vincristine activity by 13.3-fold, which was of borderline significance (P=0.052, paired t-test, Figure 3C and Table 2). No concentration-dependent effects were observed for any of the MDM2 antagonists in the low MDR-1-expressing SKNAS cells (Supplementary Figures 3A–C and Table 2). The above experiments were also carried out in high MDR-1-expressing p53 wt SHSY5Y cells. Owing to their p53 wt status, and as with Nutlin-3, NDD0005, MI-63 and RG7388 were also used in combination at 0.25 × , 0.5 × and 1 × their 72-h GI50 concentrations. Concentration-dependent sensitisation to vincristine was observed (Figures 3D–F and Table 2), which was most significant with NDD0005 (Figure 3D and Table 2). With the exception of NDD0005, the potentiation induced by the MDM2–p53 antagonists in SHSY5Y cells was not as large as that observed for SKNBe2C cells, which is most likely due to the lower absolute concentrations used in these cells compared with the p53 mutant cells (Table 2).

Figure 3

NDD0005 and MI-63 sensitise high MDR-1-expressing p53 mutant and wt neuroblastoma cells to vincristine in a concentration-dependent manner. Sensitivity of SKNBe2C cells to treatment for 72 h with vincristine alone or in combination with 1, 2 or 5 μM (A) NDD0005, (B) MI-63 or (C) RG7388. Sensitivity of SHSY5Y cells to treatment for 72 h with vincristine alone or in combination with 0.25x, 0.5x and 1 × 72-h GI50 concentrations of (D) NDD0005, (E) MI-63 or (F) RG7388. Data are shown as the average of at least three independent experiments and error bars represent s.e.m.

To provide mechanistic evidence of reduced drug efflux following combined treatment with vincristine and MDM2–p53 antagonists, LC-MS was carried out to determine the intracellular levels of vincristine in the presence of verapamil or the different antagonists in SKNBe2C, SKNAS and SHSY5Y cells (Figure 4). Cells were treated with 1 × or 5 × their respective 72-h vincristine GI50 concentrations, alone or in combination with 2 μM verapamil, Nutlin-3, NDD0005, MI-63 or RG7388 for 8 h. LC-MS analyses showed that in the presence of verapamil, Nutlin-3, NDD0005 and MI-63, but not RG7388, there was substantial increased accumulation of intracellular vincristine in the high MDR-1-expressing p53 mutant SKNBe2C (Figure 4A) and p53-wt SHSY5Y cells (Figure 4B), but not in p53 mutant low MDR-1-expressing SKNAS cells (Figure 4C). LC-MS was also used to confirm that verapamil and the MDM2 antagonists were detectable within the cell (data not shown).

Figure 4

Verapamil and MDM2–p53 antagonists Nutlin-3, NDD0005 and MI-63 increase intracellular vincristine levels in high MDR-1-expressing neuroblastoma cells but not in low MDR-1-expressing cells. Intracellular levels of vincristine in (A) SKNBe2C, (B) SHSY5Y and (C) SKNAS cells treated for 8 h with 1 × or 5 × their respective 72-h vincristine GI50 concentrations (SKNBe2C 32.8/164 nM; SHSY5Y 8.2/41 nM; SKNAS 1.5/7.5 nM) alone or in combination with 2 μM verapamil, Nutlin-3, NDD0005, MI-63 or RG7388. Data are expressed relative to cells treated with 1 × vincristine GI50 concentration alone. Data are shown as the average of at least three independent experiments±s.e.m. (D) Western blot analysis showing MDR-1 and p53 expression in SKNBe2C, SKNAS and SHSY5Y cells after treatment with 2 μM each of verapamil, NDD0005, Nutlin-3, MI-63 or RG7388 for 8 h.

MDR-1 protein expression after treatment for 8 h with 2 μM verapamil, Nutlin-3, NDD0005, MI-63 or RG7388 confirmed that the intracellular accumulation of vincristine was not due to decreased MDR-1 expression induced by treatment with the latter compounds (Figure 4D). As expected, mutant p53 expressed in SKNBe2C and SKNAS cells remained unaffected by MDM2–p53 antagonist treatment, but induced p53 stabilisation in p53 wt SHSY5Y cells (Figure 4D).

To determine whether, in the presence of verapamil or MDM2 antagonists, there was increased vincristine-mediated apoptosis, cells were treated for 72 h with vincristine at their respective 72-h GI50 concentrations (SKNBe2C 32.8 nM; SKNAS 1.5 nM; SHSY5Y 8.2 nM (Table 1)), 2 μM verapamil or MDM2–p53 antagonists alone, or in combination, and analysed for cleaved caspase-3 levels as a marker of apoptosis, compared with cells treated with vincristine alone (Figure 5A–C). Verapamil, Nutlin-3, NDD0005 and MI-63 potentiated vincristine-mediated apoptosis in high MDR-1-expressing p53 mutant SKNBe2C and p53 wt SHSY5Y cells, as evident by an increase in the levels of cleaved caspase-3 (Figure 5A and B). In contrast, relative to vincristine alone, no increase in cleaved caspase-3 levels were observed in p53 mutant low MDR-1-expressing SKNAS cells (Figure 5C).

Figure 5

Verapamil and MDM2–p53 antagonists Nutlin-3, NDD0005 and MI-63 sensitise high MDR-1-expressing neuroblastoma cells but not low MDR-1-expressing cells to vincristine-mediated apoptosis. Western blot analysis showing the levels of cleaved caspase-3 as a marker of apoptosis in (A) SKNBe2C, (B) SHSY5Y and (C) SKNAS cells treated for 72 h with 1 × their respective 72-h vincristine GI50 concentrations (SKNBe2C 32.8 nM; SHSY5Y 8.2 nM; SKNAS 1.5 nM) or 2 μM verapamil, Nutlin-3, NDD0005, MI-63 or RG7388 alone, or in combination. GAPDH was used as a loading control.

Verapamil and MDM2 antagonists sensitise high MDR-1-expressing p53 mutant neuroblastoma cells to doxorubicin

To confirm that the MDM2 antagonists were also able to sensitise p53 mutant high MDR-1-expressing neuroblastoma cells to an alternative MDR-1 substrate, the sensitivity of SKNBe2C and SKNAS cells to doxorubicin alone and in combination with 5 μM verapamil, Nutlin-3, NDD0005, MI-63 and RG7388 was determined using XTT assays. The results demonstrated that at 5 μM, verapamil and all the tested MDM2 antagonists were able to significantly reduce the GI50 of doxorubicin (P<0.05, paired t-test) and sensitise p53 mutant high MDR-1-expressing SKNBe2C but not low MDR-1-expressing SKNAS cells to doxorubicin (Supplementary Figure 4 and Supplementary Table 2). However, it is worth noting that the fold potentiation was not as marked as those observed for vincristine (Table 2).

NDD0005, MI-63 and RG7388 are not substrates of MDR-1

Similar to verapamil, Nutlin-3 has previously been shown to inhibit MDR-1 by acting as a competitive inhibitor (Michaelis ); however, it is unclear whether the same is true for NDD0005, MI-63 and RG7388. Using the paired MDCKII-wt and MDCKII-MDR-1 cell lines, sensitivity to 72 h exposure to Nutlin-3, NDD0005, MI-63 or RG7388 treatment was determined using SRB assays (Table 1). Consistent with the hypothesis that cells that express high levels of MDR-1 are less sensitive to MDR-1 substrates, MDCKII-MDR-1 cells were significantly less sensitive to Nutlin-3 compared with the MDCKII-wt cells (16±6.2 vs 7.2±3.3 μM, P<0.05, paired t-test). In contrast, overexpression of MDR-1 did not confer a significant resistance to NDD0005 (6.1±1.1 vs 7.1±1.7 μM, P=0.41 paired t-test), MI-63 (5.1±2.4 vs 4.8±3 μM, P=0.60, paired t-test) or RG7388 (238±40.4 vs 145±36.1 nM, P=0.08, paired t-test), which suggests that the latter compounds are not MDR-1 substrates (Table 1).

Verapamil does not sensitise high MDR-1-expressing p53 wt SHSY5Y cells to MDM2 antagonists

To determine whether the efficacy of MDM2 antagonists are affected by MDR-1 function, the sensitivity of high MDR-1-expressing p53 wt SHSY5Y cells to MDM2–p53 antagonists Nutlin-3, NDD0005, MI-63 and RG7388 alone and in combination with 1, 5 or 10 μM verapamil was determined using XTT assays. The concentrations of verapamil used did not affect the viability or proliferation of SHSY5Y cells when used alone (data not shown) and these concentrations have been shown to be effective at sensitising high MDR-1-expressing neuroblastoma cells to the MDR-1 substrate vincristine (Table 2). The results demonstrated that verapamil did not sensitise SHSY5Y cells to any of the MDM2–p53 antagonists (Supplementary Figure 5).

Discussion

In the last decade there has been a drive towards targeted agents in the field of cancer therapeutics. MDM2–p53-binding antagonists are one such class of novel anticancer agents currently undergoing early clinical evaluation. These inhibitors are designed to interact with the hydrophobic p53-binding pocket of MDM2, which accommodates the p53 residues Phe19, Trp23 and Leu26, thereby releasing p53 from the negative regulatory effect of MDM2 to carry out its growth inhibitory and pro-apoptotic activities. Nutlins were the first potent and selective inhibitors in this class (Vassilev ) and have been shown to induce cell cycle arrest and/or apoptosis in p53 wt tumour cells both in vitro and in vivo. In addition to p53-dependent effects, some p53-independent effects have also been described, which are not reliant on the MDM2–p53 interaction and occur with both the active and inactive enantiomers of Nutlin-3 in p53 mutant or null cancer cells, and these effects include an ability to reverse MDR-1-mediated multidrug resistance (Michaelis ).

Acquired multidrug resistance is a major cause of treatment failure, disease relapse and poor survival that affects patients with both haematological and solid malignancies. Multidrug resistance can be associated with overexpression of several members of the ATP-binding cassette transporter family such as MDR-1, MRP-1 and Breast Cancer Resistance Protein (BCRP; Szakacs ). The best characterised member, MDR-1, has broad substrate specificity and is clinically relevant in several cancers. Identifying compounds that are potent nontoxic inhibitors of ABC transporters to reverse multidrug resistance has been extensively investigated and some have reached Phase II/III clinical evaluation; however, progress to date have been hindered by off-target effects and pharmacokinetic drug–drug interactions (Falasca and Linton, 2012).

In contrast to adult malignancies, the incidence of p53 mutations is low in paediatric cancers, providing a rationale for the use of MDM2–p53 antagonists as a novel therapeutic strategy in the treatment of childhood cancer. Neuroblastoma is largely a p53 wt tumour; however, an increase in the frequency of mutations has been reported at relapse (Tweddle ; Carr-Wilkinson ). We and others have previously demonstrated the potent effects of MDM2–p53 antagonists on neuroblastoma cells with wt p53 (Van Maerken ; Van Maerken ; Van Maerken ; Gamble ). Here, using predominantly p53 mutant neuroblastoma cell lines established at relapse with varying MDR-1 expression as a model of chemoresistant disease, this study confirms and extends the original observations by Michaelis ), demonstrating that Nutlin-3 is an inhibitor of MDR-1 function and sensitises high MDR-1-expressing cells to vincristine-mediated cytotoxicity in a concentration-dependent manner. Furthermore, the present study demonstrates for the first time that in addition to Nutlin-3 other structurally unrelated MDM2–p53 antagonists can also modulate MDR-1 function in a concentration-dependent manner. This property is of particular clinical relevance as several MDM2–p53 antagonists are currently in, or will soon enter early-phase clinical evaluation, and if successful will most likely be used in combination with existing chemotherapeutics, some of which are known to be MDR-1 substrates, such as vincristine or doxorubicin.

RG7388 (Ding ), a pyrrolidine scaffold compound currently in Phase I clinical trials for patients with advanced malignancies except leukaemia (www.clinicaltrials.gov; NCT01462175), was the only MDM2–p53 antagonist that did not significantly sensitise high MDR-1-expressing cells to vincristine or increase intracellular levels of vincristine. However, when RG7388 was used at the highest tested concentration of 5 μM with vincristine, a borderline significant 13-fold sensitisation was observed. This suggests that RG7388 is not as potent as the other MDM2–p53 antagonists at inhibiting MDR-1 function but can still do so at higher concentrations. It is noteworthy that RG7388 shares some structural features with MI-63, a spiro-oxindole that is an MDR-1 inhibitor (Ding ).

RG7112 is based on a cis-imidazoline scaffold such as Nutlin-3 and has undergone clinical evaluation in early-phase trials as a single agent and in combination with doxorubicin (www.clinicaltrials.gov; NCT01677780 and NCT01605526; Ray-Coquard ). Doxorubicin has previously been reported as a substrate of MDR-1, and the efficacy results of current trials should be interpreted in the light of the study by Michaelis ), which found that Nutlin-3 can also sensitise mutant p53 cells to doxorubicin-mediated cytotoxicity, although the magnitude was not as great as observed with vincristine. Consistent with this result, our analysis of doxorubicin in combination with the MDM2–p53 antagonists demonstrated that sensitisation was also not as marked as that observed for vincristine (Supplementary Figure 4 and Supplementary Table 2).

ABC transporters are expressed in cells of the liver, kidneys, gastrointestinal tract and the epithelium of the blood–brain barrier (Schinkel, 1999), therefore affecting drug pharmacokinetics and efficacy. If MDM2–p53 inhibitors with the ability to modulate MDR-1 function are used in combination with cytotoxic drugs that are MDR-1 substrates, altered pharmacokinetics, efficacy and potentially toxic drug–drug interactions should be considered, particularly an increased risk of neurotoxicity with vincristine. Studies have demonstrated that mdr-1 knockout mice are highly sensitive to a range of MDR-1 substrates compared with wt mice (Schinkel, 1999).

Expression of MDR-1 has recently been shown to confer resistance to YM155, an inhibitor of Survivin, in neuroblastoma cells. Inhibition of MDR-1 led to sensitisation of MDR-1-overexpressing cell lines to YM155 (Lamers ). It would be interesting to determine whether combining an MDM2–p53 antagonist with an inhibitor of Survivin would lead to synergistic tumour cell killing.

In addition to modulating MDR-1 activity, Nutlin-3 has also previously been shown to affect MRP-1 and BCRP function (Michaelis ; Zhang ). Analysis of MRP-1 protein expression in the panel of cell lines used in this study demonstrated that there was no marked difference in MRP-1 expression between the cell lines (Supplementary Figure 1). BCRP expression was not analysed in the present study and it is possible that other MDM2–p53 antagonists may also be able to modulate the activity of additional ABC transporters.

The current study has also shown that despite the ability of MDM2–p53 antagonists to affect MDR-1 activity and sensitise high MDR-1-expressing cells to MDR-1 substrates, combining MDM2–p53 antagonists, Nutlin-3, NDD005, MI-63 and RG7388 with verapamil did not further sensitise p53 wt high MDR-1-expressing SHSY5Y cells to the MDM2–p53 antagonists. This result is consistent with observations that NDD005, MI-63 and RG7388 are not substrates of MDR-1. The lack of a sensitising effect with Nutlin-3, which is an MDR-1 substrate (Michaelis ), may be due to the relative affinities of Nutlin-3 vs verapamil for MDR-1, or that p53 wt cells are already highly sensitive to Nutlin-3-mediated growth inhibition such that modulating MDR-1 function has no additional effect.

In contrast to previous studies which have shown that wt p53 represses MDR-1 expression (Thottassery ; Johnson ; Vilgelm ), treatment of p53 wt SHSY5Y cells in the present study with MDM2–p53 antagonists for 8 h led to stabilisation of p53 but did not result in a decrease in MDR-1 expression. Furthermore, in contrast to studies that have shown that treatment with verapamil can lead to decreased MDR-1 expression (Muller ; Yu ), in this study treatment of high MDR-1-expressing SHSY5Y and SKNBe2C cells did not alter MDR-1 expression. However, it is possible that extended treatment periods more than 8 h are necessary to observe a reduction in MDR-1 expression.

Overall, this study demonstrates that the susceptibility of cytotoxic drugs to MDR-1-mediated transport should be considered when designing clinical trials with combination regimens including MDM2–p53 antagonists. Furthermore, these studies suggest that certain classes of MDM2–p53 antagonists combined with vincristine may be useful against p53 mutant tumours that express high levels of MDR-1, as demonstrated here particularly with the isoindolinone class. These findings have relevance for the development of both MDM2–p53 antagonists and MDR-1 or other ABC transporter inhibitors and their clinical evaluation. Future studies that extend the current in vitro observations into in vivo models are warranted.