Yong Yu1, Lijian Tao, Tubao Yang. 1. Department of Social Medicine and Health Service Management, School of Public Health, Central South University, Changsha 410078, China.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To develop a scientific and effective evaluation index system for equalization of basic public health services. METHODS: Through 2 rounds of expert evaluation, based on the relative importance of expert scoring on each index, index was screened according to the scores of mean and coefficient of variation and the weight were determined. RESULTS: The two rounds of consulting experts response rates were more than 90%, and the average authority coefficients were 0.779 and 0.781. The coordination coefficients were 0.229 and 0.349. The evaluation index system of basic public health services was composed of 3 first level, 17 second level and 47 third level indicators after 2 rounds of consultation. CONCLUSION: The evaluation index system of basic public health services is reasonable, and it can be used to evaluate the equalization of basic public health services.
OBJECTIVE: To develop a scientific and effective evaluation index system for equalization of basic public health services. METHODS: Through 2 rounds of expert evaluation, based on the relative importance of expert scoring on each index, index was screened according to the scores of mean and coefficient of variation and the weight were determined. RESULTS: The two rounds of consulting experts response rates were more than 90%, and the average authority coefficients were 0.779 and 0.781. The coordination coefficients were 0.229 and 0.349. The evaluation index system of basic public health services was composed of 3 first level, 17 second level and 47 third level indicators after 2 rounds of consultation. CONCLUSION: The evaluation index system of basic public health services is reasonable, and it can be used to evaluate the equalization of basic public health services.