Literature DB >> 24920896

Manganese-containing Prussian blue nanoparticles for imaging of pediatric brain tumors.

Matthieu F Dumont1, Sridevi Yadavilli2, Raymond W Sze3, Javad Nazarian4, Rohan Fernandes5.   

Abstract

Pediatric brain tumors (PBTs) are a leading cause of death in children. For an improved prognosis in patients with PBTs, there is a critical need to develop molecularly-specific imaging agents to monitor disease progression and response to treatment. In this paper, we describe manganese-containing Prussian blue nanoparticles as agents for molecular magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and fluorescence-based imaging of PBTs. Our core-shell nanoparticles consist of a core lattice structure that incorporates and retains paramagnetic Mn(2+) ions, and generates MRI contrast (both negative and positive). The biofunctionalized shell is comprised of fluorescent avidin, which serves the dual purpose of enabling fluorescence imaging and functioning as a platform for the attachment of biotinylated ligands that target PBTs. The surfaces of our nanoparticles are modified with biotinylated antibodies targeting neuron-glial antigen 2 or biotinylated transferrin. Both neuron-glial antigen 2 and the transferrin receptor are protein markers overexpressed in PBTs. We describe the synthesis, biofunctionalization, and characterization of these multimodal nanoparticles. Further, we demonstrate the MRI and fluorescence imaging capabilities of manganese-containing Prussian blue nanoparticles in vitro. Finally, we demonstrate the potential of these nanoparticles as PBT imaging agents by measuring their organ and brain biodistribution in an orthotopic mouse model of PBTs using ex vivo fluorescence imaging.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Prussian blue; fluorescence; imaging; magnetic resonance imaging; manganese; multimodal; nanoparticles; pediatric brain tumors

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24920896      PMCID: PMC4043710          DOI: 10.2147/IJN.S63472

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine        ISSN: 1176-9114


Introduction

Pediatric brain tumors (PBTs) are the most prevalent type of solid tumor in children and one of the leading causes of cancer-related death in the pediatric age group.1,2 The prognosis for children with aggressive PBTs such as glioblastoma multiforme, medulloblastoma, and diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma is poor, with virtually no long-term survivors.3–5 The reasons for the poor success in improving patient survival can be attributed to a historical lack of knowledge of the underlying biology of aggressive PBTs, and the lack of molecularly-specific imaging modalities to monitor disease progression and evaluate the response to treatment.6 Over the past decade, technological progress made in the field of molecular biology coupled with increased access to tissue samples from PBT patients (obtained via biopsy and/or autopsy) and the development of relevant animal models have improved our understanding of the underlying molecular biology of PBTs.3,6 However, thus far, there are no clinically approved, molecularly-specific imaging agents for PBTs, which can be primarily attributed to the challenges of working in the brain and central nervous system, including crossing the blood–brain barrier and penetrating the brain parenchyma. In this paper, we describe a manganese-containing Prussian blue (MnPB) nanoparticle for multimodal molecular magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and fluorescence-based imaging of PBTs. Our rationale for pursuing nanoparticles is that they offer unique advantages that can be harnessed for molecular imaging of PBTs,7 including: small sizes (~10–200 nm) that enable the nanoparticles to easily penetrate body barriers and extravasate across the leaky tumor vasculature of PBTs (via the enhanced permeability and retention effect, on account of the abnormal molecular and fluid transport dynamics of these tumors);8–10 high surface area-to-volume ratios that enable attachment of PBT-targeting ligands with high density; and the ability to be visualized via imaging modalities such as MRI or fluorescence.11–14 There are numerous examples in the literature of nanoparticles being used for the imaging and treatment of a variety of cancers, including gold nanoparticles/nanorods/nanoshells, iron oxide nanoparticles, carbon nanotubes, dendrimers, polymer-based nanoparticles, and quantum dots.15–18 While a few of these nanoparticles are currently undergoing clinical evaluation,7,19–23 their use for molecular imaging of PBTs has been limited, thereby representing an opportunity for the field of nanomedicine. To generate nanoparticles suitable for imaging PBTs, we have synthesized MnPB nanoparticles with a core-shell design (Figure 1A). The Prussian blue nanoparticle core (iron [III] hexacyanoferrate [II]) has a permeable lattice structure and the ability to incorporate and retain metal ions for charge balance (Figure 1B). On account of this metal-binding ability, Prussian blue, a material approved by the US Food and Drug Administration and sold as Radiogardase™ (Heyltex Corporation, Katy, TX, USA),24 has been used by first responders in the event of a radiological emergency to sequester and promptly eliminate radioactive isotopes of cesium and thallium from the body.25,26 For the purpose of MRI, we can harness this metal-binding ability of Prussian blue to sequester paramagnetic Mn2+ ions within its lattice, thereby generating MRI contrast. We use manganese ions in the nanoparticles to mitigate safety concerns associated with gadolinium ions (Gd3+, typically used in commercial contrast agents) that have been linked to nephrogenic systemic fibrosis in patients with impaired renal function.27–30
Figure 1

Manganese-containing Prussian blue nanoparticles for imaging of PBTs.

Notes: (A) Schematic representation of manganese-containing Prussian blue nanoparticles comprised of an inorganic core that provides MRI contrast and a biofunctionalized shell consisting of fluorescently-labeled avidin and biotinylated PBT-targeting ligands. (B) Schematic representation of the Prussian blue lattice (ball and stick) containing interstitial Mn2+ and K+ ions.

Abbreviations: ANG2, anti-neuron-glial antigen 2; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; PBT, pediatric brain tumor.

The Prussian blue nanoparticle core is coated with fluorescently labeled avidin as previously described.31 The avidin coating biofunctionalizes the nanoparticle and serves as a platform for attaching biotinylated ligands for tumor targeting.32,33 The fluorescent avidin enables fluorescence imaging and detection of our nanoparticles. Our reason for selecting MRI and fluorescence as the molecular imaging modalities is on account of their complementary features. MRI offers superior spatial resolution and limitless penetration depths, while fluorescence imaging can be used to image phenomena with up to picomolar sensitivity.34 Further, MRI is the standard imaging modality for diagnosis and follow-up of PBTs,35 while fluorescence can be used to sensitively outline tumor margins, which is important when planning surgical resection of PBTs.36 To confer PBT molecular targeting capabilities, we utilize two different biotinylated ligands attached to the avidin-coated nanoparticles: a biotinylated antibody targeting neuron-glial antigen 2, which is a cell surface chondroitin sulfate proteoglycan that has been observed to be overexpressed in numerous PBTs, including glioblastoma multiforme and diffuse intrinsic pontine gliomas;37–39 and biotinylated transferrin, a glycoprotein that has been shown to specifically target a variety of tumors, including PBTs, and to assist various cargo in crossing the blood-brain barrier.40–42 Here we describe the synthesis, biofunctionalization, and characterization of the MnPB nanoparticles. We also evaluate the suitability of these nanoparticles for MRI and fluorescence-based imaging of PBTs in vitro using cells derived from brain tumors of a genetically engineered mouse model of PBT. Finally, we evaluate the imaging capabilities of our nanoparticles by studying their organ and brain biodistribution in an orthotopic mouse model of PBT using ex vivo fluorescence imaging.

Materials and methods

Materials

All synthetic procedures were conducted using ultrapure water obtained from a Milli-Q system (Millipore Corporation, Billerica, MA, USA) with resistivity ≥ 18 MΩ cm. All chemicals and reagents were purchased from Fisher-Acros (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) or Sigma-Aldrich (St Louis, MO, USA), and used as supplied.

Synthesis of MnPB nanoparticles

Synthesis of the MnPB nanoparticles was carried out at ambient temperature by addition of a solution containing 0.0049 g FeCl2·4H2O (2.5×10−2 mmol) in 5 mL of Milli-Q water to a solution containing 0.0049 g MnCl2·4H2O (2.5×10−2 mmol) in 10 mL of Milli-Q water with vigorous stirring. This step was followed by immediate addition of a solution containing 0.0092 g of K3Fe(CN)6 (2.8×10−2 mmol) in 5 mL of Milli-Q water. After stirring for a further 15 minutes, the resulting nanoparticle precipitate was collected by centrifuging, rinsed with copious amounts of Milli-Q water, and redispersed in Milli-Q water. Energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy of the blue powder obtained using the synthesis scheme yielded the formula: K0.6Mn0.7FeIII4[FeII(CN)6]3.5·3H2O.

Physical characterization of MnPB nanoparticles

Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) of the MnPB nanoparticles was performed using a JEM-2100 FEG high-resolution instrument (JEOL, Ltd, Tokyo, Japan) at 200 kV. Energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy was performed using an Inca 250 (Oxford Instruments, Abingdon, UK) coupled to the high-resolution TEM. Three scans of different parts of the MnPB sample were performed and averaged to obtain the relative percentages of iron, potassium, and manganese (Supplementary materials). X-ray diffraction patterns of the MnPB nanoparticles were measured on a D8 Advance powder diffractometer using CuKα radiation, and Topas software (Bruker AXS GmbH, Karlsruhe, Germany) was utilized for peak fitting via a fundamental parameters approach. Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectra of the MnPB nanoparticles were recorded on an FTIR spectrometer (Thermo Nicolet Nexus 670, Thermo Fisher Scientific) using MnPB nanoparticle powders pressed against a ZnSe-attenuated total reflectance anvil.

Measurements of magnetic resonance relaxation times and data analysis of MnPB nanoparticles

All magnetic resonance measurements were performed in a horizontal 3 T clinical magnet (GE Healthcare, Little Chalfont, UK). The sample-containing phantom was placed adjacent to a block containing 2% agar (150 cm3) and secured at the center of an eight-channel HD brain coil (GE Healthcare). The MRI scanner was interfaced with the built-in GE Healthcare software. The magnetic resonance data were analyzed using ImageJ (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA). For each sample, the signal intensity of the acquired images was averaged over the area of the sample. The magnetic resonance images for MnPB nanoparticles were acquired using clinical GE Healthcare sequences (T1 Cube, echo train 24; repetition time 600 msec; echo time 11.0 msec for T1-weighted, initial flip angle 120° and minimum flip angle 25°; and T2 Cube, echo train 100; repetition time 2,500 msec; echo time 79.6 msec for T2-weighted). The concentrations of Prussian blue and MnPB measured were 8.500, 4.250, 2.120, 1.062, 0.531, 0.265, 0.132, 0.066, 0.033, 0.016, 0.008, and 0.004 mg/mL.

Coating MnPB nanoparticles with fluorescent avidin

A 0.9 mL suspension of MnPB in Milli-Q water (180 μg/mL) and 0.1 mL of filtered Alexa Fluor 488-labeled avidin solution (A488, 1 mg/mL; Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA) or Avidin-Texas Red (ATxRd, 1 mg/mL; Life Technologies) were mixed by vortexing. The mixture was protected from light and contacted on an orbital shaker for at least 3 hours at 4°C. After contacting MnPB with fluorescent avidin, the unbound avidin was rinsed by centrifugation for 5 minutes at 20,000× g three times. In between each centrifugation, the supernatant was discarded and the particles (ie, MnPB-A488 or MnPB-ATxRd) resuspended by brief sonication in 0.5 mL of Milli-Q water. After the last centrifugation, the particles were resuspended in Milli-Q water.

Attaching biotinylated ligands onto Avidin-coated MnPB

A 0.9 mL dispersion of avidin-coated MnPB nanoparticles in Milli-Q water (180 μg/mL) and 0.1 mL of filtered, biotinylated anti-neuron-glial antigen 2 (ANG2; Millipore Corporation, Billerica, MA, USA), biotinylated eotaxin-3 antibody (AbC; PeproTech Inc) or biotinylated human transferrin (Rockland Immunochemicals, Inc., Gilbertsville, PA, USA) were mixed. The mixture was protected from light and contacted on an orbital shaker for at least 3 hours at 4°C. After reaction, the unbound biotinylated ligands were removed by rinsing and the resulting biofunctionalized particles (ie, MnPB-A488-ANG2, MnPB-A488-AbC, or MnPB-ATxRd-transferrin) were resuspended in Milli-Q water as described previously. The names and components of the nanoparticles used in this study are summarized in Table S1.

Nanoparticle size, charge, and temporal stability

The sizes and zeta potentials of the suspensions of MnPB, avidin-coated MnPB, and biotinylated ligand-modified avidin-coated MnPB nanoparticles (10 μg/mL) were determined using a Zetasizer Nano ZS (Malvern Instruments, Malvern, UK). The temporal stability of the nanoparticles was determined in Milli-Q water and Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle’s Medium (Life Technologies).

Cells used for study

Adherent mouse brainstem glioma (BSG) D10 cells and nonadherent mouse neurospheres were derived from a genetically engineered mouse model of BSG as described previously.43 BSG D10 cells were cultured in Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle’s Medium containing high glucose supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (Life Technologies) and 100 units/mL of penicillin plus 100 μg/mL of streptomycin (Life Technologies). The cultures were maintained at 5% CO2 and 37°C. The mouse neurospheres were cultured in mouse Neurocult medium (Stem Cell Technologies, Vancouver, BC, Canada) supplemented with 10% mouse cell proliferation supplement (Stem Cell Technologies), glutamine, penicillin-streptomycin, heparin 2 μg/mL, recombinant mouse epidermal growth factor 20 ng/mL, and recombinant mouse fibroblast growth factor 10 ng/mL.

Molecular MRI-based detection of PBT cells

BSG D10 cells were grown in T75 flasks until ~80% confluence. The cells were blocked with 1 % bovine serum albumin before addition of the nanoparticles. After the blocking step, the cells were incubated with MnPB-A488, MnPB-A488-AbC, or MnPB-A488-ANG2 for a further hour. The cells were rinsed three times with 10 mL of phosphate-buffered saline to remove any nonspecifically bound nanoparticles, trypsinized, and collected in a microcentrifuge tube at 2,100 rpm for 5 minutes. Finally, the cells were fixed with 10% formaldehyde in neutral buffer. After discarding the supernatant, each cell pellet was redispersed in 200 μL of Milli-Q water and pipetted into individual microcentrifuge tubes. A solution of 0.2 mL agarose (1%) was added to each tube and the tube contents were mixed thoroughly. The phantom comprised of sample-containing microcentrifuge tubes was placed next to a 2% solid agar block (150 cm3), secured, and measured as described previously. For each of the sequences, images were acquired at the identical coronal 0.5 mm thick slice, positioned at mid-height of the tubes. A T1 spin echo sequence was used for T1-weighted images (repetition time 650 msec; echo time 11 msec; echo train 1; matrix size 320×256, field of view 10×10 cm2, flip angle 90°). T2-weighted images were acquired with a T2 fast relaxation fast spin echo sequence (repetition time 3,000 msec; echo time 101 msec; echo train 28; matrix size 384×288, field of view 10×10 cm2). For easier reading, the original gray scale images were converted into a color scale image. Normalized intensity was derived after subtracting the signal contribution from the agarose solution.

Fluorescence-based detection of PBT cells

BSG D10 cells were seeded on poly-L-lysine and laminin-coated chamber slides and grown under the culture conditions specified above. The cells were rinsed with phosphate-buffered saline, fixed in 10% formaldehyde in neutral buffer solution for 15 minutes, and permeabilized in 0.1% Triton X-100 for a further 10 minutes. The cells were then blocked in 1% bovine serum albumin for one hour, followed by incubation with MnPB-A488, MnPB-A488-AbC, or MnPB-A488-ANG2 nanoparticles for one additional hour. The cells were then rinsed three times with phosphate-buffered saline and immunostained for GFAP using anti-GFAP antibody (Abcam, Cambridge, UK) and Alexa-647-labeled secondary antibody (Life Technologies). For visualizing nuclei, the cells were briefly stained with 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (Life Technologies) and imaged using a laser scanning confocal microscope (Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany) and ZEN 2009 software. Flow cytometry analysis of MnPB-A488, MnPB-A488-AbC, and MnPB-A488-ANG2 nanoparticle specificity for BSG D10 was performed as described previously.26

Biodistribution of nanoparticles in a mouse model of PBT

The mouse studies were conducted in accordance with the protocols approved by the Children’s National Medical Center’s Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (292-12-05, March 2013, and 01335, March 2014). The orthotopic mouse model of PBT was developed by injecting 2-day-old BALB/c mice (The Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, ME, USA) with neurospheres derived from a genetically engineered mouse model of BSG.43 The injected mice developed PBTs by 21 days post-injection. To evaluate the brain and organ biodistribution of the nanoparticles, we injected MnPB-ATxRd-transferrin into the tail veins of mice with PBT. As controls, we utilized PBT mice that did not undergo nanoparticle injections. The mice were humanely euthanized at various time points (one, 3, 6, and 24 hours post-injection; controls were sacrificed at 3 hours) using carbon dioxide and cervical dislocation in accordance with the approved protocol. Organs, including the brain, liver, kidney, spleen, and heart, were extracted from the experimental and control mice, and fixed using 10% formaldehyde in neutral buffer. The fluorescence intensities of the various organs were measured using an IVIS Spectrum preclinical in vivo imaging system (PerkinElmer, Boston, MA, USA). Mouse brains that had a positive fluorescence signal were fixed in 10% formaldehyde in neutral buffer. Sagittal sections of the brains were stained with hematoxylin and eosin to detect the presence of tumor (hypercellularity).

Statistical analysis

The mean ± standard deviation value for each group is presented in this study. Statistical significance between groups was analyzed using Student’s t -tests and one-way analysis of variance. A P-value <0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.

Results

Synthesis and characterization of MnPB nanoparticles

The MnPB nanoparticles were prepared using a single-pot, aqueous phase synthesis by addition of iron (II) chloride to a mixture containing manganese chloride and potassium hexacyanoferrate (III). The resulting MnPB nanoparticles had a mean size of 33±7 nm, measured using high-resolution TEM (Figures 2A and S1), and the nanoparticle lattice parameters corresponded to Prussian blue measured by selected area electron diffraction patterns (Figure S2). FTIR spectral measurements of the MnPB nanoparticles yielded a broad band at 2,070 cm−1, corresponding to the FeII–CN–FeIII cyanide stretch energy that was also obtained in the spectrum of Prussian blue (without manganese; Figure 2B). The FTIR spectrum for MnPB did not display a band at 2,149 cm−1 characteristic of MnII–NC–FeIII.44
Figure 2

Properties of the MnPB nanoparticles.

Notes: (A) Representative transmission electron microscopy image of MnPB nanoparticles. (B) Fourier transform infrared spectra of Prussian blue without interstitial manganese (solid line) and MnPB (dashed line) in the cyanide stretching region (1,900 cm−1 to 2,200 cm−1).

Abbreviation: MnPB, manganese-containing Prussian blue.

We determined the chemical composition of the MnPB nanoparticles using energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy and elemental analysis (Figure S3 and Table S2). These analyses derived the formula K0.6Mn0.7FeIII4[FeII(CN)6]3.5·3 H2O for MnPB with an average of 0.7 atoms of manganese per unit cell. X-ray diffraction studies of MnPB and Prussian blue nanoparticle powders yielded several groups of peaks that corresponded to Prussian blue lattices (space group Fm-3m; No. 225), confirming the presence of a single phase in both types of nanoparticle constituted by Prussian blue. No mixed phase peaks were detected, suggesting that both MnPB and Prussian blue were made up of the Prussian blue lattice (Figure S4). We serially diluted Prussian blue and MnPB nano-particles to determine their longitudinal and transverse relaxivities (r1 and r2 values, respectively) at a magnetic field strength of 3 T (Figures 3 and S5). Relaxivity measurements with MnPB yielded an r value of 15.8 mM−1 s−1 and an r2 value of 143 mM−1 s−1. Similar measurements carried out with Prussian blue (without manganese) yielded an r1 value of 7.9 mM−1 s−1 and an r2 value of 14.4 mM−1 s−1. The r1 and r2 values for MnPB and Prussian blue are shown in Table 1.
Figure 3

T1W and T2W magnetic resonance images of Prussian blue and MnPB at 3 T.

Abbreviations: T1W, T1-weighted; T2W, T2-weighted; MnPB, manganese-containing Prussian blue.

Table 1

Magnetic resonance measurements of relaxivity of MnPB nanoparticles

Contrast agentChemical compositionRelaxivity (mM−1 s−1)
r1r2
MnPBK0.6M0.7FeIII4[FeII(CN)6]3.5·3H2O15.8143.0
Prussian blueK2.8FeIII4[FeII(CN)6]3.7·2H2O7.914.4

Note: Magnetic resonance measurements of relaxivity were performed at 127 mHz (3 T).

Abbreviation: MnPB, manganese-containing Prussian blue.

Sizing, stability, and reproducibility of biofunctionalized MnPB nanoparticles

Our syntheses consistently yielded nanoparticles with a ~5%–10% variation in size between batches. Using light scattering techniques, we observed a change in the zeta potential (from −38 mV to −15 mV to −24 mV) and an increase in the hydrodynamic diameter of the MnPB nanoparticles (from 126±25 nm to 159±30 nm to 240±48 nm; Figure 4A) with the addition of the individual components of the biofunctional shell, ie, from MnPB (without modifications) to MnPB-A488 (MnPB coated with A488) and MnPB-A488-ANG2 (MnPB-A488 coated with biotinylated antibody ANG2). The resulting biofunctionalized nanoparticles were stable in both water and Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle’s Medium (Figure 4B) for >4 days (110 hours) after synthesis. The error bars in Figure 4B represent the instrument error in measuring the hydrodynamic diameters of the nanoparticles. We evaluated the safety of the MnPB-A488-ANG2 nanoparticles as a molecular imaging agent by conducting cytotoxicity studies. These studies indicated negligible cytotoxicity at nanoparticle concentrations of < 1.25×10−7 mg/cell at 24 and 48 hours (Figure S6).
Figure 4

Size and stability of biofunctionalized MnPB nanoparticles.

Notes: (A) Size distribution of MnPB-A488-ANG2 after each functionalization step. Hydrodynamic size distributions of the MnPB nanoparticles, MnPB nanoparticles coated with avidin-Alexa Fluor 488 (MnPB-A488), and MnPB-A488 modified with biotinylated anti-neuron-glial antigen 2 (MnPB-A488-ANG2), respectively. (B) Temporal stability of MnPB nanoparticles and MnPB-A488-ANG2 in Milli-Q water and Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle’s Medium for up to 4 days post synthesis.

Abbreviations: MnPB, manganese-containing Prussian blue; A488, avidin-Alexa Fluor 488; ANG2, anti-neuron-glial antigen 2 antibody; DMEM, Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle’s Medium.

In vitro molecular MRI-based detection of PBT cells

To evaluate MnPB-A488-ANG2 nanoparticles as molecularly-targeted MRI agents for detecting PBT cells, we contacted BSG D10 cells with MnPB-A488-ANG2 (n=6), with MnPB-A488-AbC (n=3), and with MnPB-A488 (n=3); we then scanned the sample-containing phantoms, and obtained T1-weighted and T2-weighted images (Figure 5). The MnPB-A488-ANG2 nanoparticles bound to the BSG D10 cells and generated hyperintensity (augmentation of the signal) in the T1-weighted images and hypointensity (attenuation of the signal) in the T2-weighted images (Figure 5A). Control (MnPB-A488-AbC [control antibody] and MnPB-A488 [no antibody]) nanoparticles exhibited negligible binding to BSG D10 and the observed changes in magnetic resonance signal intensity were modest (Figure 5A). Quantitative analysis of the T1-weighted images showed that the MnPB-A488-ANG2 nanoparticles bound to BSG D10 and were distinctly detected (signal intensity of 94 au). The controls (MnPB-A488-AbC and MnPB-A488) showed background contrast levels, ie, a signal intensity of ~10 au (Figure 5B). Signal intensity quantification of the T2-weighted images confirmed that MnPB-A488-ANG2 nanoparticles specifically bound to BSG D10 as it generated hypointensity (signal intensity of 41 au). The controls (MnPB-A488-AbC and MnPB-A488) did not display significant attenuation of the signal (107 and 75, respectively; Figure 5B). These results demonstrated the feasibility of detecting PBT cells using our biofunctionalized MnPB nanoparticles in both T1-weighted and T2-weighted images.
Figure 5

Molecular MRI-based detection of PBT cells using biofunctionalized Prussian blue nanoparticles. (A) T1-weighted and T2-weighted contrast enhancement in phantoms comprised of a fixed number of BSG D10 treated with MnPB-A488-ANG2 (n=6), MnPB-A488-AbC (n=3), or MnPB-A488 (no antibody, triplicate). (B) Normalized fluorescence signal intensity (au) for BSG D10 treated with ANG2, AbC, and no antibody-modified MnPB-A488. **P<0.05.

Abbreviations: MnPB, manganese-containing Prussian blue; A488, avidin-Alexa Fluor 488; ANG2, anti-neuron-glial antigen 2; AbC, eotaxin antibody; BSG, brainstem glioma; T1W, T1-weighted; T2W, T2-weighted; PBT, pediatric brain tumor; au, arbitrary units; Ab, antibody; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging.

In vitro fluorescence-based detection of PBT cells

To investigate our nanoparticles as fluorescence imaging agents, we added fixed amounts of MnPB-A488-ANG2 (containing ANG2 antibody), MnPB-A488-AbC (with control antibody AbC), and MnPB-A488 (no antibody) to BSG D10 cells. Confocal fluorescence microscopy demonstrated that the MnPB-A488-ANG2 specifically targeted BSG D10 cells (Figure 6). Control (MnPB-A488-AbC and MnPB-A488) nanoparticles showed negligible binding to BSG D10 (negligible green fluorescence; Figure 6A and 6B).
Figure 6

Fluorescence-based detection of PBT cells using biofunctionalized Prussian blue nanoparticles.

Notes: Fluorescent image of BSG D10 treated with control nanoparticles, ie, (A) MnPB-A488 and (B) MnPB-A488-AbC, and experimental nanoparticles, ie, (C) MnPB-A488-ANG2. The green fluorescence comes from A488 on the constructs. Scale bars represent 20 μm.

Abbreviations: BSG, brainstem glioma; MnPB, manganese-containing Prussian blue; A488, avidin-Alexa Fluor 488; ANG2, anti-neuron-glial antigen 2; AbC, eotaxin antibody; PBT, pediatric brain tumor.

We quantitatively measured the binding of MnPB-A488-ANG2 to BSG D10 using flow cytometry. We separately added MnPB-A488-ANG2 and controls (MnPB-A488-AbC and MnPB-A488) to cultures of BSG D10 and measured the distribution of the cell populations that were fluorescently labeled (denoted as Alexa Fluor 488-positive; Figures 7A and S7). The MnPB-A488-ANG2 nanoparticles specifically bound to the BSG D10 cells (81%±4% Alexa Fluor 488-positive; Figure 7B) compared with MnPB-A488-AbC (23%±2% Alexa Fluor 488-positive; Figure 7B) and MnPB-A488 (22%±3% Alexa Fluor 488-positive; Figure 7B) where the nanoparticles showed background levels of binding to BSG D10 cells. Taken together, these results demonstrated the ability of our nanoparticles (with antibody ANG2) to molecularly target BSG D10 cells effectively using fluorescence imaging.
Figure 7

Flow cytometric analysis of the specificity of biofunctionalized MnPB nanoparticles for PBT cells.

Notes: (A) Representative histograms of cell count plotted against Alexa Fluor 488 detection levels for BSG D10 cells treated with MnPB-A488 (no antibody, red line), MnPB-A488-AbC (blue line), and MnPB-A488-ANG2 (black line), and stained with 7-AAD. (B) Percentage Alexa Fluor 488-positive cells (fluorescence intensity cutoff 50) cells for BSG D10 treated with MnPB-A488-ANG2, MnPB-A488-AbC, or MnPB-A488. **P<0.05.

Abbreviations: BSG, brainstem glioma; 7-AAD, 7-aminoactinomycin D; MnPB, manganese-containing Prussian blue; A488, avidin-Alexa Fluor 488; ANG2, anti-neuron-glial antigen 2; PBT, pediatric brain tumor; au, arbitrary units.

Ex vivo nanoparticle biodistribution studies

In order to investigate the feasibility of our nanoparticles as imaging agents in vivo, we conducted preliminary fluorescence biodistribution studies. Mice with PBTs were intravenously administered MnPB-ATxRd-transferrin nanoparticles. We made two changes to the nanoparticle design: we chose transferrin as the targeting ligand on the nanoparticles since our mice with PBTs were observed to overexpress the transferrin receptor compared with neuronglial antigen 2 (from our unpublished proteomic analysis of mice PBTs); and we selected Texas Red as the imaging fluorophore because tissue penetration depths are increased and tissue autofluorescence is decreased as the selected imaging fluorophore wavelengths are red-shifted toward near infrared wavelengths. Following intravenous injection, the mice organs, ie, brain, liver, kidney, spleen and heart, were harvested at different time points (between one and 24 hours) and their fluorescence measured. Fluorescence measurements of the brains of the mice detected the nanoparticles in the brain between one hour and 3 hours, with the fluorescent signal reaching a maximum at one hour (Figure 8A). Little to no fluorescence was detected after 3 hours and in the control mouse brain (without nanoparticle injection). Fluorescence organ biodistribution measurements showed that the nanoparticles were cleared via the liver, kidney, and spleen (Figure 8B and 8C). Mouse brains that were positive for fluorescent signal were analyzed by histology. Sagittal sections of the brain stained by hematoxylin and eosin revealed a hypercellular region located within the fluorescently active brain segment localized in the ventricular and periventricular regions of the mouse brain (Figure 9). These results indicated the feasibility of utilizing our nanoparticles for fluorescence imaging of PBTs in vivo.
Figure 8

Ex vivo fluorescence imaging of biodistribution of the nanoparticles in an orthotopic mouse model of PBT.

Notes: (A) Fluorescent signal observed in the brains of four separate mice with PBT (1–24 hours) injected intravenously (via tail vein) with transferrin-coated Prussian blue nanoparticles (MnPB-ATxRd-Tf). A control mouse with PBT was not injected with nanoparticles. (B) Representative ex vivo fluorescence imaging of organ biodistribution of the nanoparticles at 3 hours post-injection. (C) Histograms quantifying the observed fluorescence biodistribution of the nanoparticles 3 hours post-injection. ROIs for intensity measurements are indicated by white dashed lines in (B).

Abbreviations: PBT, pediatric brain tumor; MnPB, manganese-containing Prussian blue; ATxRd, Texas Red-labeled avidin; Tf, transferrin; ROI, region of interest; au, arbitrary units.

Figure 9

Histological analysis of fluorescence-positive regions of mice brains with PBTs.

Notes: (A) Sagittal slice of mouse brain stained with hematoxylin and eosin. (B) Inset showing a fluorescence image of the brain, with arrow indicating the viewing direction of the sagittal section in (A). (C, D) Progressive zooms of the hematoxylin and eosin-stained sagittal brain sections containing a hypercellular ventricular and periventricular region within the fluorescence-positive region.

Abbreviation: PBT, pediatric brain tumor.

Discussion

Here we have described the synthesis of novel MnPB nanoparticles by utilizing the cation-incorporating property (for charge neutrality) of Prussian blue nanoparticles. Comprehensive physical and chemical characterization (Figures 2 and S1–S4) of these nanoparticles using TEM, energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy, powder X-ray diffraction, and FTIR confirmed that they have a structure virtually identical to that of Prussian blue nanoparticles, indicating that the Mn2+ ions were not modifying the Prussian blue lattice structure and likely occupying the lattice tetragonal sites (interstitial vacancies). MnPB nanoparticles possess MRI contrast-enhancing capabilities (both negative and positive), which was confirmed by generation of positive contrast on a T1-weighted image sequence and negative contrast on a T2-weighted image sequence at 3 T (Figures 3 and S4, Table 1). Compared with Gd3+-containing commercial contrast agents, which are typically used solely as positive contrast agents, the magnetic measurement data established the efficiency of the MnPB nanoparticles as MRI contrast agents useful in both T1-weighted and T2-weighted sequences, thus confirming MnPB nanoparticles as versatile contrast agents in new imaging applications involving combinations of both T1-weighted and T2-weighted sequences. Preliminary studies confirm the feasibility of utilizing MnPB as MRI contrast agents in both T1-weighted and T2-weighted sequences (Figure S8). The surface of the MnPB nanoparticles was negatively charged (zeta potential −38 mV), which electrostatically stabilized the nanoparticle suspension, thereby eliminating the need for stabilizing surfactants.45,46 To biofunctionalize the nanoparticles for molecular targeting of PBTs, the MnPB nanoparticles were first coated with a layer of fluorescent avidin (A488 or ATxRd). Avidin, which is a highly positively charged glycoprotein at physiological pH (isoelectric point ~10.5), was coated on the surface of the negatively charged MnPB nanoparticles using electrostatic self-assembly.15,17 The surfaces of the fluorescent avidin-coated MnPB nanoparticles were modified with the PBT-targeting or control ligands (ANG2, transferrin, or AbC) via an avidin-biotin interaction, which is one of the most robust, noncovalent interactions identified (Kd =10−15 M), and is capable of sustaining extremes of temperature, pH, and harsh chemical conditions.15,33,47,48 The biofunctionalized nanoparticles demonstrated temporal stability (over 4 days), both in water and in Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle’s Medium (Figure 4), and negligible cytotoxicity (at concentrations <1.25×10−7 mg/cell; Figure S6) to PBT cells (BSG D10), indicating their safety for use as molecular imaging agents. The nanoparticles were able to specifically detect PBT cells (BSG D10) using MRI in both T1-weighted and T2-weighted sequences by generating specific positive and negative contrast, respectively, relative to the controls that exhibited background contrast (Figure 5). The nanoparticles also demonstrated specific fluorescence-based detection of PBT cells (Figures 6 and 7, and S7). These results validated the utility of our nanoparticles as multimodal imaging agents for PBTs. Preliminary biodistribution studies using ex vivo fluorescence imaging in a mouse model of PBT indicated that the nanoparticles were cleared via the liver, kidney, and spleen (Figure 8). Longer circulation times and lower immunogenicity of our nanoparticles for future in vivo imaging studies will require modifications of the current design, including coating of the nanoparticles with the “stealth” polymer, polyethylene glycol (PEGylation),18,49,50 which is currently being investigated. Ex vivo brain fluorescence biodistribution studies also demonstrated that the fluorescent signal of our nanoparticles was detected in the brain between one hour and 3 hours. Histological analysis of the fluorescent region within the mouse brain confirmed the presence of a hypercellular region in the ventricular and periventricular regions overlapping the region of the brain exhibiting a fluorescent signal (Figure 9). The increased fluorescence signal in the brain was possibly due to an increased transient presence of our nanoparticles in the hypercellular region within the brain (Figure 9). For future in vivo imaging of PBTs, the design of our nanoparticles will be modified to incorporate ligands (by varying type of ligand, ligand surface density) that cross the blood–brain barrier, penetrate the brain parenchyma, and assist uptake within PBTs.51,52 These studies are currently in progress.

Conclusion

In this paper, we describe the synthesis and characterization of novel, biofunctionalized MnPB nanoparticles for imaging PBTs. These nanoparticles exhibited fluorescence as well as superior and versatile MRI contrast enhancement capabilities. We demonstrated these nanoparticles to be multimodal imaging agents using MRI and fluorescence-based detection of PBT cells in vitro. Preliminary ex vivo fluorescence imaging provided a proof-of-concept demonstration of our nanoparticles as imaging agents and suggests the potential of these nanoparticles as agents for multimodal and molecular imaging of PBTs in vivo. Size of manganese-containing Prussian blue nanoparticles. Notes: (A) Transmission electron micrograph of an oversized agglomerate consisting of over 500 nanoparticles (scale bar 1 μm) used for selected area electron diffraction. (B) Histogram showing the size distribution of 198 nanoparticles with a mean nanoparticle size of 33±7 nm. The size analysis was performed with ImageJ software by manually measuring the size of the individual nanoparticles from the transmission electron microscopy images of well dispersed, individual nanoparticles. Selected area electron diffraction pattern of a manganese-containing Prussian blue nanoparticle with 200, 220, and 400 reflections identified as the lattice corresponding to Prussian blue. Composition of manganese-containing Prussian blue nanoparticles. Notes: (A) Energy-dispersive X-ray spectrum corresponding to the region of interest shown in (B), which is a representative transmission electron micrograph of the nanoparticles. The purple line indicates the limits of a typical region of interest analyzed by energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy. The composition was derived by built-in software (Inca; Oxford Instruments, Abingdon, UK) from the attribution of the electronic energy profile for Fe, K, and Mn. Room temperature X-ray diffractogram of a sample of MnPB and PB with peaks at around 17, 24, and 35 degrees, corresponding to the 200, 220, and 400 diffraction planes, respectively. Notes: X-ray diffraction from a sample of particles showed several groups of peaks corresponding to the 200, 220, and 400 diffraction planes at 17.43, 24.67, and 35.24 degrees, respectively, for MnPB and 17.51, 24.68, and 35.29 degrees, respectively, for PB. These diffraction peaks were indexed to Prussian blue lattices using the space group Fm-3m (No. 225) and confirmed the presence of one phase constituted by Prussian blue. Using the (400) reflections fitted to a Gaussian function, the lattice parameters for each compound were calculated. We found the following lattice constants: MnPB (a =10.19 Å) and PB (a =10.17 Å). No peaks corresponding to a mixed phase (such as manganese) with different lattice parameters were detected, suggesting that both MnPB and PB are made up of the Prussian blue lattice. Abbreviations: PB, Prussian blue particles without interstitial gadolinium; MnPB, manganese-containing Prussian blue. Inverse of relaxation times (1/T1=R1 and 1/T2=R2) plotted against concentrations of the main paramagnetic ion. Note: r1 and r2 values are derived from the linear fitting of these plots. Abbreviations: PB, Prussian blue particles without interstitial gadolinium; MnPB, manganese-containing Prussian blue. Cytotoxicity studies of biofunctionalized MnPB nanoparticles. Viability (survival percentage) of BSG D10 coincubated with varying concentrations of MnPB-A488-ANG2 determined by (A) Trevigen® XTT assay and (B) Trypan blue exclusion assay. Notes: **P<0.05. We seeded 10,000 and 50,000 BSG D10 cells for the XTT and Trypan blue exclusion assays, respectively, before adding varying concentrations of MnPB-A488-ANG2 to the cells (studies were performed in triplicate). The cells were coincubated with the nanoparticles for 48 hours at 37°C and 5% CO2. The cell viability assays indicated minimal cytotoxicity at nanoparticle concentrations lower than 1.25×10−7 mg/cell after 24 and 48 hours using both assays. Abbreviations: BSG, brainstem glioma; MnPB, manganese-containing Prussian blue; ANG2, anti-neuron-glial antigen 2. Flow cytometric analysis of nanoparticle specificity for BSG D10 cells. Notes: For clarity, the axes legends have been omitted. The side light scattering is displayed on the x-axis (abscissa) and the forward light scattering on the y-axis (ordinate). Flow cytometric analysis of the BSG D10 treated with (A) MnPB-AV488, (B) MnPB-AV488-AbC, and (C) MnPB-A488-ANG2 demonstrated specific targeting of BSG D10 cells using the targeted MnPB-A488-ANG2 nanoparticles. Abbreviations: BSG, brainstem glioma; MnPB, manganese-containing Prussian blue; ANG2, anti-neuron-glial antigen 2. Magnetic resonance images of mouse brains injected ex vivo with two concentrations of MnPB and with saline (control). Notes: Mouse brains preserved in 10% formaldehyde in neutral buffer were injected with 10 μL or 20 μL of a dispersion of 8.5 mg/mL MnPB or 20 μL of saline. The brains were superficially rinsed with Milli-Q water and embedded in 0.5% agarose prior to imaging. Magnetic resonance images were acquired using clinical GE Healthcare sequences (T1 FLAIR: echo train 7; repetition time 2,300 msec; echo time 24.4 msec; matrix size 512×224, field of view 16×16 cm2; and T2 FRFSE: echo train 21; repetition time 3,500 msec; echo time 104 msec; matrix size 20×224; field of view 16×16 cm2). Abbreviation: MnPB, manganese-containing Prussian blue. Names and components of nanoparticles described in text Abbreviation: MnPB, manganese-containing Prussian blue particles. Summary of relative percentages of potassium, iron, and manganese from three distinct energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopic scans of manganese-containing Prussian blue particles
Table S1

Names and components of nanoparticles described in text

Construct nameCoreFluorophore in avidin layerTargeting ligand
MnPBMnPBNoneNone
MnPB-A488MnPBAlexa Fluor 488None
MnPB-ATxRdMnPBTexas RedNone
MnPB-A488-ANG2MnPBAlexa Fluor 488Anti-neuron-glial antigen 2
MnPB-A488-AbCMnPBAlexa Fluor 488Eotaxin-3 antibody
MnPB-ATxRd-TfMnPBTexas RedHuman transferrin

Abbreviation: MnPB, manganese-containing Prussian blue particles.

Table S2

Summary of relative percentages of potassium, iron, and manganese from three distinct energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopic scans of manganese-containing Prussian blue particles

Potassium (%)Iron (%)Manganese (%)
Spectrum 19.0379.867.86
Spectrum 28.5385.737.32
Spectrum 38.7784.058.87
  47 in total

1.  AVIDIN. 4. STABILITY AT EXTREMES OF PH AND DISSOCIATION INTO SUB-UNITS BY GUANIDINE HYDROCHLORIDE.

Authors:  N M GREEN
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  1963-12       Impact factor: 3.857

2.  Avidin. II. Composition and mode of action of avidin A.

Authors:  H FRAENKEL-CONRAT; N S SNELL; E D DUCAY
Journal:  Arch Biochem Biophys       Date:  1952-07       Impact factor: 4.013

3.  Driver mutations in histone H3.3 and chromatin remodelling genes in paediatric glioblastoma.

Authors:  Jeremy Schwartzentruber; Andrey Korshunov; Xiao-Yang Liu; David T W Jones; Elke Pfaff; Karine Jacob; Dominik Sturm; Adam M Fontebasso; Dong-Anh Khuong Quang; Martje Tönjes; Volker Hovestadt; Steffen Albrecht; Marcel Kool; Andre Nantel; Carolin Konermann; Anders Lindroth; Natalie Jäger; Tobias Rausch; Marina Ryzhova; Jan O Korbel; Thomas Hielscher; Peter Hauser; Miklos Garami; Almos Klekner; Laszlo Bognar; Martin Ebinger; Martin U Schuhmann; Wolfram Scheurlen; Arnulf Pekrun; Michael C Frühwald; Wolfgang Roggendorf; Christoph Kramm; Matthias Dürken; Jeffrey Atkinson; Pierre Lepage; Alexandre Montpetit; Magdalena Zakrzewska; Krzystof Zakrzewski; Pawel P Liberski; Zhifeng Dong; Peter Siegel; Andreas E Kulozik; Marc Zapatka; Abhijit Guha; David Malkin; Jörg Felsberg; Guido Reifenberger; Andreas von Deimling; Koichi Ichimura; V Peter Collins; Hendrik Witt; Till Milde; Olaf Witt; Cindy Zhang; Pedro Castelo-Branco; Peter Lichter; Damien Faury; Uri Tabori; Christoph Plass; Jacek Majewski; Stefan M Pfister; Nada Jabado
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2012-01-29       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 4.  Pediatric brain tumor treatment: growth consequences and their management.

Authors:  Sogol Mostoufi-Moab; Adda Grimberg
Journal:  Pediatr Endocrinol Rev       Date:  2010-09

Review 5.  Nanoparticle PEGylation for imaging and therapy.

Authors:  Jesse V Jokerst; Tatsiana Lobovkina; Richard N Zare; Sanjiv S Gambhir
Journal:  Nanomedicine (Lond)       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 5.307

6.  MRI as a central component of clinical trials analysis in brainstem glioma: a report from the Pediatric Brain Tumor Consortium (PBTC).

Authors:  Tina Young Poussaint; Mehmet Kocak; Sridhar Vajapeyam; Roger I Packer; Richard L Robertson; Russell Geyer; Daphne Haas-Kogan; Ian F Pollack; Gilbert Vezina; Robert Zimmerman; Soonmee Cha; Zoltan Patay; James M Boyett; Larry E Kun
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2011-02-04       Impact factor: 12.300

Review 7.  Design and fabrication of magnetic nanoparticles for targeted drug delivery and imaging.

Authors:  Omid Veiseh; Jonathan W Gunn; Miqin Zhang
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  2009-11-10       Impact factor: 15.470

Review 8.  Transferrin receptor ligand-targeted toxin conjugate (Tf-CRM107) for therapy of malignant gliomas.

Authors:  Michael Weaver; Douglas W Laske
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 4.130

Review 9.  Nanotechnology-novel therapeutics for CNS disorders.

Authors:  Maya Srikanth; John A Kessler
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurol       Date:  2012-04-24       Impact factor: 42.937

10.  Diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma: poised for progress.

Authors:  Katherine E Warren
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2012-12-28       Impact factor: 6.244

View more
  13 in total

1.  Modulation of miRNA-155 alters manganese nanoparticle-induced inflammatory response.

Authors:  Matthew W Grogg; Laura K Braydich-Stolle; Elizabeth I Maurer-Gardner; Natasha T Hill; Suraj Sakaram; Madhavi P Kadakia; Saber M Hussain
Journal:  Toxicol Res (Camb)       Date:  2016-10-13       Impact factor: 3.524

2.  Biofunctionalized prussian blue nanoparticles for multimodal molecular imaging applications.

Authors:  Jennifer M Vojtech; Juliana Cano-Mejia; Matthieu F Dumont; Raymond W Sze; Rohan Fernandes
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2015-04-28       Impact factor: 1.355

3.  Absence of human cytomegalovirus infection in childhood brain tumors.

Authors:  Iacopo Sardi; Maurizio Lucchesi; Sabrina Becciani; Ludovica Facchini; Milena Guidi; Anna Maria Buccoliero; Maria Moriondo; Gianna Baroni; Alessia Stival; Silvia Farina; Lorenzo Genitori; Maurizio de Martino
Journal:  Am J Cancer Res       Date:  2015-07-15       Impact factor: 6.166

4.  Conjugating Prussian blue nanoparticles onto antigen-specific T cells as a combined nanoimmunotherapy.

Authors:  Rachel A Burga; Shabnum Patel; Catherine M Bollard; Conrad Russell Y Cruz; Rohan Fernandes
Journal:  Nanomedicine (Lond)       Date:  2016-07-07       Impact factor: 5.307

5.  Photothermal therapy improves the efficacy of a MEK inhibitor in neurofibromatosis type 1-associated malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors.

Authors:  Elizabeth E Sweeney; Rachel A Burga; Chaoyang Li; Yuan Zhu; Rohan Fernandes
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-11-11       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Composite iron oxide-Prussian blue nanoparticles for magnetically guided T1-weighted magnetic resonance imaging and photothermal therapy of tumors.

Authors:  Shraddha S Kale; Rachel A Burga; Elizabeth E Sweeney; Zungho Zun; Raymond W Sze; Anthony Tuesca; J Anand Subramony; Rohan Fernandes
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2017-09-05

Review 7.  Safety considerations for nanoparticle gene delivery in pediatric brain tumors.

Authors:  Kathryn M Luly; John Choi; Yuan Rui; Jordan J Green; Eric M Jackson
Journal:  Nanomedicine (Lond)       Date:  2020-07-23       Impact factor: 6.096

Review 8.  The Role of NG2 Proteoglycan in Glioma.

Authors:  Sridevi Yadavilli; Eugene I Hwang; Roger J Packer; Javad Nazarian
Journal:  Transl Oncol       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 4.243

9.  CpG-coated prussian blue nanoparticles-based photothermal therapy combined with anti-CTLA-4 immune checkpoint blockade triggers a robust abscopal effect against neuroblastoma.

Authors:  Juliana Cano-Mejia; Anshi Shukla; Debbie K Ledezma; Erica Palmer; Alejandro Villagra; Rohan Fernandes
Journal:  Transl Oncol       Date:  2020-07-08       Impact factor: 4.243

10.  Prussian Blue Nanoparticle-Labeled Mesenchymal Stem Cells: Evaluation of Cell Viability, Proliferation, Migration, Differentiation, Cytoskeleton, and Protein Expression In Vitro.

Authors:  Jirui Wen; Zhiwei Zhao; Ruijie Tong; Liwei Huang; Yali Miao; Jiang Wu
Journal:  Nanoscale Res Lett       Date:  2018-10-22       Impact factor: 4.703

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.