Benjamin Vitre1, Nikita Gudimchuk2, Ranier Borda1, Yumi Kim1, John E Heuser3, Don W Cleveland4, Ekaterina L Grishchuk5. 1. Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research and Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093. 2. Physiology Department, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104. 3. Department of Cell Biology, Washington University in Saint Louis, St Louis, MO 63110WPI Institute for Cell and Material Sciences, Kyoto University, Kyoto 606-8501, Japan. 4. Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research and Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093 dcleveland@ucsd.edu gekate@mail.med.upenn.edu. 5. Physiology Department, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104 dcleveland@ucsd.edu gekate@mail.med.upenn.edu.
Abstract
Centromere protein E (CENP-E) is a highly elongated kinesin that transports pole-proximal chromosomes during congression in prometaphase. During metaphase, it facilitates kinetochore-microtubule end-on attachment required to achieve and maintain chromosome alignment. In vitro CENP-E can walk processively along microtubule tracks and follow both growing and shrinking microtubule plus ends. Neither the CENP-E-dependent transport along microtubules nor its tip-tracking activity requires the unusually long coiled-coil stalk of CENP-E. The biological role for the CENP-E stalk has now been identified through creation of "Bonsai" CENP-E with significantly shortened stalk but wild-type motor and tail domains. We demonstrate that Bonsai CENP-E fails to bind microtubules in vitro unless a cargo is contemporaneously bound via its C-terminal tail. In contrast, both full-length and truncated CENP-E that has no stalk and tail exhibit robust motility with and without cargo binding, highlighting the importance of CENP-E stalk for its activity. Correspondingly, kinetochore attachment to microtubule ends is shown to be disrupted in cells whose CENP-E has a shortened stalk, thereby producing chromosome misalignment in metaphase and lagging chromosomes during anaphase. Together these findings establish an unexpected role of CENP-E elongated stalk in ensuring stability of kinetochore-microtubule attachments during chromosome congression and segregation.
Centromere protein E (CENP-E) is a highly elongated kinesin that transports pole-proximal chromosomes during congression in prometaphase. During metaphase, it facilitates kinetochore-microtubule end-on attachment required to achieve and maintain chromosome alignment. In vitro CENP-E can walk processively along microtubule tracks and follow both growing and shrinking microtubule plus ends. Neither the CENP-E-dependent transport along microtubules nor its tip-tracking activity requires the unusually long coiled-coil stalk of CENP-E. The biological role for the CENP-E stalk has now been identified through creation of "Bonsai" CENP-E with significantly shortened stalk but wild-type motor and tail domains. We demonstrate that Bonsai CENP-E fails to bind microtubules in vitro unless a cargo is contemporaneously bound via its C-terminal tail. In contrast, both full-length and truncated CENP-E that has no stalk and tail exhibit robust motility with and without cargo binding, highlighting the importance of CENP-E stalk for its activity. Correspondingly, kinetochore attachment to microtubule ends is shown to be disrupted in cells whose CENP-E has a shortened stalk, thereby producing chromosome misalignment in metaphase and lagging chromosomes during anaphase. Together these findings establish an unexpected role of CENP-E elongated stalk in ensuring stability of kinetochore-microtubule attachments during chromosome congression and segregation.
Accurate chromosome segregation in mitosis depends on the dynamic interactions between the
kinetochore and spindle microtubules. Kinetochores are complex multiprotein structures that
localize at the centromeres of duplicated chromosomes during mitosis. The main function of the
kinetochores is to connect chromosomes to the mitotic spindle and mediate signaling the state of
this attachment to the cell cycle machinery (Cleveland
). One kinetochore component, centromere protein E
(CENP-E), is a plus end–directed, microtubule-dependent motor from the kinesin-7 family.
Similar to other members of the kinesin superfamily, CENP-E is a homodimer, in which two motor
domains are linked with two tail domains via a dimerizing coiled coil. The stalk domain of CENP-E is
highly elongated, spanning >200 nm (Kim
), significantly longer than in most kinesins. This
fibrillar kinesin accumulates before mitosis (Brown
), but soluble CENP-E molecules in the cytoplasm of a
mitotic cell are believed to be folded and inactive, as the tail of CENP-E can bind the motor
domains, inhibiting the microtubule-stimulated ATPase activity (Espeut ). Previous work also suggested that the
initially autoinhibited CENP-E becomes activated during mitosis via phosphorylation, which disrupts
tail-mediated motor inhibition (Espeut
). At mitosis onset, CENP-E also becomes recruited to
the outer layer of each kinetochore via its kinetochore-binding site located near its C-terminus
(Chan ). A fully
elongated extension of the active, kinetochore-bound CENP-E may help to increase the span of the
amino-terminal motor domain from a bound kinetochore cargo, thereby potentiating capture of spindle
microtubules during prometaphase (Kim
, 2010; Gudimchuk ). At the
kinetochores of aligned chromosomes in metaphase, however, the CENP-E is not fully extended, and its
conformation changes when the kinetochore is under tension (Wan
).Results of the genetic depletion of CENP-E (Putkey
; Weaver
), its removal from kinetochores (McEwen ), and inhibition of its motor
activity (Gudimchuk )
implicate CENP-E as an important kinetochore component that contributes to high fidelity of
chromosome segregation. CENP-E plays an essential role in transporting pole-proximal chromosomes to
the spindle equator during prometaphase, a process called chromosome congression (Yen ; Schaar ; Wood
). The initial congression of misaligned chromosomes
takes place along already established kinetochore fibers and along the microtubules directed to the
spindle equator (Kapoor ; Cai ).
CENP-E–mediated chromosome motility requires that its motor domain is active (Kim , 2010), but whether other molecular features of this kinetochore protein have
important physiological significance in not yet known. In addition to its transporting role during
congression, CENP-E has been suggested to play a role in facilitating
kinetochore–microtubule attachment during metaphase (Gudimchuk ). Consistently, depletion of CENP-E results
in 50% decrease in the density of kinetochore fibers in human and mouse cells (McEwen ; Putkey ). Of interest, the stabilization of
kinetochore–microtubule attachment also appears to require CENP-E–dependent
localization of other proteins to the kinetochore, especially protein phosphatase 1 (PP1; Kim ) and the checkpoint
protein BubR1 (Guo ).
CENP-E–dependent localization of these (and potentially other kinetochore proteins) may help
to regulate the dynamics of kinetochore–microtubule interactions and/or signal the state of
these attachments to the cell cycle machinery. It has also been suggested that CENP-E is required
for normal kinetochore–microtubule attachment during anaphase, since a genetic depletion of
CENP-E from cells in regenerating mouse liver and embryonic fibroblasts in culture results in an
increased frequency of lagging chromosomes (Putkey
; Weaver
).Much of the molecular information about the CENP-E kinesin has also been learned from motility
assays in vitro. Molecules of purified full-length CENP-E protein show heterogeneous behavior on a
microtubule wall: whereas many CENP-E molecules bind microtubules transiently and show diffusive
motion, some motors walk unidirectionally and processively (Gudimchuk ). The heterogeneity of single CENP-E
molecules is consistent with the idea that the CENP-E tail can inhibit its own motor domain and that
these interactions are transient. Indeed, the reported dissociation constant of 3 μM for
purified tail and head domains suggests weak binding (Espeut
). Of importance, truncated versions of CENP-E, which
completely lack the elongated stalk and C-terminal tail, can walk well along a microtubule and
transport microbeads, thereby mimicking the activities of the active molecules of full-length CENP-E
and indicating that the stalk and tail have little effect during CENP-E's walking (Kim ; Yardimci ; Gudimchuk
). However, whereas full-length CENP-E can associate
processively with the ends of dynamic microtubules in vitro, the truncated motor falls off
microtubule ends and fails to track (Gudimchuk
). Of interest, when purified tail and motor domains are
joined together using Quantum Dots, this produces conjugates that walk well along a microtubule wall
and are able to recapitulate the processive association with the plus end of dynamic microtubules
characteristic of full-length CENP-E (Gudimchuk
). These experiments suggested that neither the
tip-tracking activity nor the CENP-E–dependent transport along a microtubule wall in vitro
requires the elongated stalk of CENP-E, raising a question about its contribution to CENP-E
functions. Through creation of “Bonsai” versions of CENP-E in which its stalk is
significantly shortened but wild-type motor and tail domains are retained, we now identify the
biological role for the CENP-E stalk.
RESULTS
CENP-E coiled-coil stalk regulates motor function in vitro
Previous structural work visualizing purified CENP-E dimers with electron microscopy reported
that soluble CENP-E can adopt many different conformations (Kim
), consistent with a highly flexible coiled-coil region.
Direct examination of full-length XenopusCENP-E by electron microscopy using
quick-freeze deep-etch and platinum replication (Heuser,
1989) identified a small proportion of CENP-E molecules in a folded conformation in which the
extended stalk domain was looped and the head and tail appeared to be bound (Figure 1A, bottom). The low incidence of folded molecules may reflect the transient
nature of this configuration, since binding between purified head and tail domains is weak (Espeut ).
FIGURE 1
In vitro characterization of Bonsai CENP-E functions. (A) Schematics and electron micrographs of
individual full-length CENP-E molecules. Our analysis of electron micrographs shows that 3.6% of
CENP-E molecules (total N = 84) appear folded. Scale bar, 100 nm. (B) Schematic of
full-length (FL), Bonsai (BS), and truncated (TR) CENP-E constructs. C-terminal tail of CENP-E has
both a microtubule (MT)-binding site and a motor-binding domain (not shown), which can bind to the
motor domain, inhibiting its activity. (C) Representative images of microtubule fields for different
CENP-E coverslips. Colored overlays compare microtubules images at different times: red, initial
positions; green, 2 s later. Scale bar, 5 μm. (D) Velocity and percentage of moving
microtubules for truncated and Bonsai CENP-E. Bars, median ± SEM. At least five independent
microscopy chambers were analyzed with truncated and two chambers with Bonsai CENP-E; 10–45
microtubules were analyzed for each chamber. (E) Schematic and montage of stills from a time-lapse
of Bonsai CENP-E–coated bead visualized with DIC. Numbers is time in seconds from the start
of the bead's motion. Diagram shows velocity of beads coated with full-length, Bonsai, and truncated
CENP-E. Bars, mean ± SEM; based on 26 beads for full-length, 20 for Bonsai, and 57 for
truncated CENP-E proteins. Data for truncated and full-length CENP-E are from Gudimchuk ). (F) Representative
kymographs for truncated and Bonsai CENP-E molecules moving on Taxol-stabilized microtubules
recorded under identical experimental conditions. Yellow arrowheads point to less bright complexes,
which, based on quantitative analysis of fluorescence intensity, represent one or two CENP-E dimers.
In Bonsai CENP-E chambers, only larger molecular clusters show directed motility (pink arrows),
presumably because occasionally such protein clusters contain uninhibited CENP-E motor heads. (G)
Microtubule affinity of truncated, Bonsai, and full-length CENP-E measured in a fluorescence-based
pelleting assay with AMPPNP. Mean ± SEM, based on two or more independent experiments.
Kd values are reported with 95% confidence.
In vitro characterization of Bonsai CENP-E functions. (A) Schematics and electron micrographs of
individual full-length CENP-E molecules. Our analysis of electron micrographs shows that 3.6% of
CENP-E molecules (total N = 84) appear folded. Scale bar, 100 nm. (B) Schematic of
full-length (FL), Bonsai (BS), and truncated (TR) CENP-E constructs. C-terminal tail of CENP-E has
both a microtubule (MT)-binding site and a motor-binding domain (not shown), which can bind to the
motor domain, inhibiting its activity. (C) Representative images of microtubule fields for different
CENP-E coverslips. Colored overlays compare microtubules images at different times: red, initial
positions; green, 2 s later. Scale bar, 5 μm. (D) Velocity and percentage of moving
microtubules for truncated and Bonsai CENP-E. Bars, median ± SEM. At least five independent
microscopy chambers were analyzed with truncated and two chambers with Bonsai CENP-E; 10–45
microtubules were analyzed for each chamber. (E) Schematic and montage of stills from a time-lapse
of Bonsai CENP-E–coated bead visualized with DIC. Numbers is time in seconds from the start
of the bead's motion. Diagram shows velocity of beads coated with full-length, Bonsai, and truncated
CENP-E. Bars, mean ± SEM; based on 26 beads for full-length, 20 for Bonsai, and 57 for
truncated CENP-E proteins. Data for truncated and full-length CENP-E are from Gudimchuk ). (F) Representative
kymographs for truncated and Bonsai CENP-E molecules moving on Taxol-stabilized microtubules
recorded under identical experimental conditions. Yellow arrowheads point to less bright complexes,
which, based on quantitative analysis of fluorescence intensity, represent one or two CENP-E dimers.
In Bonsai CENP-E chambers, only larger molecular clusters show directed motility (pink arrows),
presumably because occasionally such protein clusters contain uninhibited CENP-E motor heads. (G)
Microtubule affinity of truncated, Bonsai, and full-length CENP-E measured in a fluorescence-based
pelleting assay with AMPPNP. Mean ± SEM, based on two or more independent experiments.
Kd values are reported with 95% confidence.To determine whether the flexible elongated stalk of CENP-E is essential for its function, we
characterized the activity of a “Bonsai” CENP-E in which 1475 amino acids (aa) of
the ∼1700 aa CENP-E coiled-coil domain were removed, thus shortening the stalk by 85% (Figure 1B). This shorter stalk contains the minimal segment that is
sufficient for CENP-E dimerization and is predicted to form short discontinuous coiled coil
(Supplemental Figure S1A). Bonsai CENP-E was expressed in insect cells, leading to production of the
expected 197-kDa product (Supplemental Figure S1B). First, we tested whether Bonsai CENP-E could
power the movement of microtubules in a traditional gliding assay in vitro. Bonsai CENP-E was
attached to a coverslip using an antibody to its C-terminal green fluorescent protein (GFP) tag, and
motions of stabilized fluorescent microtubules were recorded in the presence of ATP (Supplemental
Figure S1C). This mutant retained robust motor activity, although the gliding rate and the
percentage of moving microtubules were reduced compared with truncated CENP-E that lacked the entire
stalk and tail (Figure 1, C and D). We next used the same
conjugation strategy to attach Bonsai protein to microbeads. Laser tweezers were used to bring the
beads in contact with coverslip-attached microtubules, and their mobility was assessed via
differential interference contrast (DIC) microscopy (Figure 1E
and Supplemental Figure S1D). This approach confirmed that Bonsai CENP-E transported cargo along
microtubule tracks with a reduced velocity relative to either truncated or full-length CENP-E,
producing microbead transport velocities of 5.9 ± 0.5, 17.1 ± 1.6, and 19.2
± 2.1 μm/min, respectively (Figure 1E). We
conclude that cargo-conjugated Bonsai CENP-E could support microtubule motility, but with a reduced
velocity.Strikingly different results were seen when we used total internal reflection fluorescence (TIRF)
microscopy to visualize how cargo-free molecules of Bonsai CENP-E interacted with microtubules
(Supplemental Figure S1E). Previous work with truncated CENP-E established that soluble molecules of
this dimeric motor readily bind and walk on microtubules, whereas the full-length molecules either
diffuse or walk processively (Kim ; Gudimchuk ). In contrast to both of these constructs, we observed no binding between Bonsai CENP-E
molecules and microtubules; consequently, there was no detectable motion of Bonsai CENP-E along a
microtubule wall or the tip tracking at the microtubule end that is characteristic of full-length
CENP-E. Occasionally we observed processive motion of fluorescent complexes, which, based on their
brightness, contained multiple molecules of Bonsai CENP-E, confirming that this protein was capable
of moving on microtubules under these assay conditions (Figure
1F, pink arrows, and Supplemental Figure S1F). The lack of single-molecule walking on
microtubules appeared to result from a reduced association rate between Bonsai and microtubules, as
numerous motor molecules were present in the solution and could be seen attached nonspecifically to
the coverslip (Supplemental Figure S1G). The initial brightness of these dots and the number of
photobleaching steps were highly similar to those seen for dimeric kinesin 1 motor but not for the
monomers of Ndc80-GFP protein (Supplemental Figure S1, H–J). Together these results
demonstrate that Bonsai CENP-E dimerizes but fails to bind to microtubules.Of importance, the inhibition of microtubule binding by soluble, cargo-free Bonsai CENP-E dimers
was stronger than that seen with full-length CENP-E, which differs from Bonsai only in the length of
the flexible stalk. When we carried out a microtubule-pelleting assay in the presence of AMPPNP, a
nonhydrolyzable analogue of ATP known to induce rigor binding of motor heads (Liao ), both full-length and truncated
CENP-E proteins bound strongly to microtubules (Kd = 24 ± 10 and
23 ± 7 nM, respectively). However, Bonsai CENP-E showed almost no binding (Figure 1G), confirming that in the absence of a cargo, this mutant
protein has a highly reduced affinity to microtubules. Together these assays revealed that elongated
flexible stalk of CENP-E plays an important role in regulating its motor activity in vitro.
Elongated stalk is essential for efficient chromosome congression via an
CENP-E–dependent mechanism
Previous work using Xenopus egg extracts and cells revealed that motor activity
of CENP-E is essential for chromosome congression (Kim
, 2010). Indeed,
a CENP-E “rigor” mutant, which stably binds to the microtubules and cannot walk, is
not capable of mediating congression (Kim
). In addition, it was proposed that CENP-E could
promote congression by facilitating capture of already established bundles of kinetochore
microtubules due to its highly elongated and flexible coiled-coil stalk (Kim ). To examine the in vivo function
of the CENP-E stalk during congression in human cells, we created several cell lines expressing
different versions of Bonsai CENP-E (Figure 2A and Supplemental
Figure S2A).
FIGURE 2
Analysis of Bonsai CENP-E functions in prometaphase. (A) Schematic of the full-length and Bonsai
Myc-Lap-GFP–tagged CENP-E proteins used in DLD-1 cells. (B) Schematic of experimental
timeline to prepare cells for endogenous CENP-E depletion, Bonsai or full-length CENP-E rescue and
imaging. (C) Representative images of two cells depleted of endogenous CENP-E and expressing
full-length or Bonsai CENP-E in the presence of DMSO or CENP-E inhibitor GSK 923295. Green
arrowheads point to CENP-E accumulated at the spindle poles. Scale bar, 5 μm. (D)
Representative image of a cell with depleted endogenous CENP-E and expressing the Bonsai CENP-E;
note the presence of polar chromosomes. Graph shows the average percentage of cells with more than
five polar chromosomes. Here and elsewhere, “E” is a control (empty) condition when
cells were not rescued. Error bars, SEM; **p < 0.01; *p
< 0.05; p value of unpaired t test realized on the mean of
two (empty) or three (full-length and Bonsai) independent experiments; N = 69 cells
for empty, 158 for Bonsai, and 92 for full-length CENP-E. Scale bar, 5 μm. (E)
Representative image of BubR1 immunostaining of DLD-1 cells, which were depleted of endogenous
CENP-E and induced to express the Bonsai or full-length CENP-E protein. Graph representing BubR1
signal intensity at the kinetochore of unaligned chromosomes in different cells. N
= 78 unaligned kinetochores were measured for full-length CENP-E (from 10 cells), 87 for Bonsai (14
cells), and 53 for empty (6 cells). Scale bar, 5 μm.
Analysis of Bonsai CENP-E functions in prometaphase. (A) Schematic of the full-length and Bonsai
Myc-Lap-GFP–tagged CENP-E proteins used in DLD-1 cells. (B) Schematic of experimental
timeline to prepare cells for endogenous CENP-E depletion, Bonsai or full-length CENP-E rescue and
imaging. (C) Representative images of two cells depleted of endogenous CENP-E and expressing
full-length or Bonsai CENP-E in the presence of DMSO or CENP-E inhibitor GSK 923295. Green
arrowheads point to CENP-E accumulated at the spindle poles. Scale bar, 5 μm. (D)
Representative image of a cell with depleted endogenous CENP-E and expressing the Bonsai CENP-E;
note the presence of polar chromosomes. Graph shows the average percentage of cells with more than
five polar chromosomes. Here and elsewhere, “E” is a control (empty) condition when
cells were not rescued. Error bars, SEM; **p < 0.01; *p
< 0.05; p value of unpaired t test realized on the mean of
two (empty) or three (full-length and Bonsai) independent experiments; N = 69 cells
for empty, 158 for Bonsai, and 92 for full-length CENP-E. Scale bar, 5 μm. (E)
Representative image of BubR1 immunostaining of DLD-1 cells, which were depleted of endogenous
CENP-E and induced to express the Bonsai or full-length CENP-E protein. Graph representing BubR1
signal intensity at the kinetochore of unaligned chromosomes in different cells. N
= 78 unaligned kinetochores were measured for full-length CENP-E (from 10 cells), 87 for Bonsai (14
cells), and 53 for empty (6 cells). Scale bar, 5 μm.A gene encoding each of these mutants (which differed in the length of the CENP-E stalk), as well
as full-length CENP-E (Kim ), was integrated at a specific genomic locus in human DLD-1 cells using the
FRT/Flp-mediated recombination Flip-In system. Next endogenous CENP-E, which undergoes cell
cycle–dependent accumulation and loss that mimics that of cyclin B (Brown ), was depleted using small
interfering RNA (siRNA) directed against the 3′ untranslated region of the endogenous CENP-E
mRNA (Kim ), and the
cells were “rescued” by inducing either full-length or Bonsai myc-tagged-GFP CENP-E
proteins by addition of doxycycline for 8 h (Figure 2B).
Induction by addition of doxycycline led to comparable accumulation level of each variant
(Supplemental Figure S2B). Both long and medium Bonsai CENP-E displayed normal kinetochore
localization, and each was enriched at kinetochores of unaligned chromosomes. Short Bonsai CENP-E
showed highly reduced kinetochore signal (Supplemental Figure S2C). To examine the growth of these
Bonsai CENP-E cell lines, we performed a clonogenic assay in cells incubated in doxycycline for
>15 d. Expression of medium Bonsai CENP-E resulted in fewer colonies, consistent with a
stronger perturbation of mitotic cell division (Supplemental Figure S2D), and so this construct was
used for more-detailed characterization.Because our in vitro data indicated that shortening its stalk disrupted CENP-E binding to
microtubules, we first tested whether the kinetochore-bound shortened CENP-E was capable of
interacting with microtubules directly. Cells were treated with GSK923295, a small-molecule
inhibitor of CENP-E, which locks its kinesin motor in a “rigor” state, strongly
bound to microtubules (Wood ). In cells rescued with full-length CENP-E, this treatment caused a loss of
kinetochore-bound CENP-E and its accumulation at the poles of the mitotic spindle after passive
translocation via poleward microtubule flux (Gudimchuk
). After treatment with the CENP-E inhibitor, Bonsai
CENP-E also accumulated at the spindle poles, revealing that the kinetochore-bound Bonsai was still
able to bind to microtubules and adopt a rigor-like state (Figure
2C).To evaluate whether Bonsai CENP-E could support normal congression of polar chromosomes, we
quantified the proportion of cells with an elevated number of polar chromosomes (more than five). A
threefold increase in the number of cells with polar chromosomes was seen with Bonsai CENP-E
relative to rescue with full-length CENP-E (52 ± 5 vs. 18 ± 5%; Figure 2D), indicating significant loss of CENP-E-dependent congression. The
elevated number of polar chromosomes in cells rescued with Bonsai CENP-E triggered a strong
activation of the mitotic checkpoint, as the average mitotic duration increased twofold compared
with cells depleted of CENP-E (300 ± 29 vs. 163 ± 31 min; Supplemental Figure S2E).
This delay suggested that Bonsai CENP-E could still preserve functionality of the mitotic checkpoint
(Abrieu ; Mao ).To test this further, we measured the recruitment of BubR1 at the kinetochores of polar
chromosomes in cells rescued with Bonsai CENP-E, since wild-type CENP-E has been shown to contribute
to BubR1 targeting (Weaver ). Quantitative immunofluorescence measurements revealed comparable accumulation of BubR1
at the kinetochores of unaligned chromosomes in full-length and Bonsai-rescued cells, whereas cells
depleted of CENP-E displayed 50% reduction in BubR1 signal at kinetochores of polar chromosomes
(Figure 2E). Thus, these assays revealed that in a cellular
context, Bonsai CENP-E retained ability to 1) localize to kinetochores (thus attaching to its
cargo), 2) bind to microtubules and produce a rigor phenotype in the presence of its specific
inhibitor, including passive accumulation at poles, and 3) support normal mitotic checkpoint
activity. Nevertheless, Bonsai CENP-E missing the extended coiled-coil was unable to support
efficient congression of polar chromosomes.
CENP-E motor function is required for stabilization of kinetochore–microtubule
attachment in metaphase
In addition to its role in chromosome congression, CENP-E potentiates stabilization of
kinetochore–microtubule attachment. The initial evidence for this was that depletion of
CENP-E resulted in 50% reduction of kinetochore microtubule fibers of fully congressed, metaphase
chromosomes (McEwen ;
Putkey ). Further,
genomic deletion of CENP-E led to lagging chromosomes in mouse embryonic fibroblast and cells of
regenerating liver (Putkey ; Weaver ).
Finally, in a recent effort, two different approaches (depletion of CENP-E by RNA interference and
drug-induced inhibition of CENP-E to inactivate motor activity and displace it from kinetochores)
were used to demonstrate that the CENP-E motor facilitates kinetochore–microtubule
attachment in metaphase and during induced microtubule depolymerization (Gudimchuk ). Reduced
kinetochore–microtubule stability after low temperature–induced microtubule
depolymerization has also been found for other kinetochore microtubule-binding proteins, including
the NDC80 complex (DeLuca ), suggesting that CENP-E functions in protecting kinetochore microtubule ends from
cold-induced disassembly and detachment.We tested whether kinetochore-bound Bonsai CENP-E retained this ability. Cells rescued with
Bonsai or full-length CENP-E were arrested in metaphase using MG132 (to impose mitotic arrest,
whether or not the mitotic checkpoint signal was active) and subjected to cold treatment for 20 min.
Compared to the full-length CENP-E control, cells rescued with Bonsai CENP-E displayed a 30%
reduction of cold-stable microtubules, a level comparable to cells depleted of CENP-E (Figure 3A). This result indicated that Bonsai CENP-E was deficient in
protecting microtubule ends from cold-induced disassembly. Consistent with the reduced density of
cold-stable kinetochore–microtubules, measurement of interkinetochore distances in
unperturbed metaphase cells revealed that they were significantly shorter in cells rescued with the
Bonsai motor (Figure 3B).
FIGURE 3
Reduced stability of kinetochore–microtubule attachment in metaphase in cells expressing
Bonsai CENP-E. (A) Representative images of mitotic cells arrested at metaphase with proteasome
inhibitor MG132 and subjected to cold for 20 min. Cells were depleted of endogenous CENP-E and
rescued with the Bonsai or full-length CENP-E or not rescued. Yellow frame indicates area where
tubulin intensity was measured. Scale bar, 4 μm. Right, mean intensity of tubulin signal for
cells submitted to cold; *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01;
p value of unpaired t test realized on the mean of three
independent experiments. N = 78 cells were analyzed for full-length, 107 for
Bonsai, and 70 for empty condition. (B) Representative image used for interkinetochore distance
measurement. Purple double-arrowhead indicates the interkinetochore distance. Scale bar, 5
μm. Diagram represents the mean interkinetochore distance in cells depleted of endogenous
CENP-E expressing full-length and Bonsai CENP-E. *p < 0.05,
p value of unpaired t test realized on the mean of two independent
experiments. We analyzed 248 kinetochores from 9 cells for full length and 272 from 10 cells for
Bonsai. (C) Schematic illustrating timing of cell plating and drug treatment used for experiments in
D. Cells were arrested at metaphase with MG132 and imaged live. Noc, nocodazole; Dox, doxycycline.
(D) Still images from Supplemental Videos S1 (Full Length) and S2 (Bonsai) showing loss of
chromosome alignment (yellow arrowheads) after the chromosomes congressed to the spindle equator.
Numbers are time in minutes; scale bar, 10 μm. Right, average time from nocodazole release
to first chromosome unalignment event in cells treated as in C. Bars represent the mean time to the
first unalignment of chromosome. N = 78 and 58 cells for full-length and Bonsai
CENP-E, respectively, based on three independent experiments; N = 33 cells for
empty condition based on two independent experiments; ***p < 0.001;
p value of an unpaired t test realized on the mean of three
independent experiments. Error bars, SEM.
Reduced stability of kinetochore–microtubule attachment in metaphase in cells expressing
Bonsai CENP-E. (A) Representative images of mitotic cells arrested at metaphase with proteasome
inhibitor MG132 and subjected to cold for 20 min. Cells were depleted of endogenous CENP-E and
rescued with the Bonsai or full-length CENP-E or not rescued. Yellow frame indicates area where
tubulin intensity was measured. Scale bar, 4 μm. Right, mean intensity of tubulin signal for
cells submitted to cold; *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01;
p value of unpaired t test realized on the mean of three
independent experiments. N = 78 cells were analyzed for full-length, 107 for
Bonsai, and 70 for empty condition. (B) Representative image used for interkinetochore distance
measurement. Purple double-arrowhead indicates the interkinetochore distance. Scale bar, 5
μm. Diagram represents the mean interkinetochore distance in cells depleted of endogenous
CENP-E expressing full-length and Bonsai CENP-E. *p < 0.05,
p value of unpaired t test realized on the mean of two independent
experiments. We analyzed 248 kinetochores from 9 cells for full length and 272 from 10 cells for
Bonsai. (C) Schematic illustrating timing of cell plating and drug treatment used for experiments in
D. Cells were arrested at metaphase with MG132 and imaged live. Noc, nocodazole; Dox, doxycycline.
(D) Still images from Supplemental Videos S1 (Full Length) and S2 (Bonsai) showing loss of
chromosome alignment (yellow arrowheads) after the chromosomes congressed to the spindle equator.
Numbers are time in minutes; scale bar, 10 μm. Right, average time from nocodazole release
to first chromosome unalignment event in cells treated as in C. Bars represent the mean time to the
first unalignment of chromosome. N = 78 and 58 cells for full-length and Bonsai
CENP-E, respectively, based on three independent experiments; N = 33 cells for
empty condition based on two independent experiments; ***p < 0.001;
p value of an unpaired t test realized on the mean of three
independent experiments. Error bars, SEM.Next we assessed whether the presence of Bonsai CENP-E affected the maintenance of chromosome
biorientation at metaphase. Cells were arrested with MG132, as before, and chromosome alignment was
monitored by live-cell imaging (Figure 3, C and D, and
Supplemental Videos S1 and S2). Cells rescued with full-length CENP-E maintained proper chromosome
biorientation for ∼300 min before losing metaphase chromosome alignment, with multiple DNA
masses separating simultaneously, a phenotype known as chromosome scattering due to loss of cohesion
(Daum ; Stevens ). In cells rescued with Bonsai
CENP-E, however, loss of chromosome alignment occurred much more quickly, with timing comparable to
that in cells with no CENP-E rescue (150 and 190 min, respectively). The premature loss of
chromosome alignment in Bonsai CENP-E cells affected fewer chromosomes and increased slowly over
time, indicative of defective kinetochore microtubule attachment rather than a cohesion defect.
These findings indicate that Bonsai CENP-E cannot properly stabilize chromosome alignment,
supporting the idea that presence of a wild-type stalk is important for CENP-E–dependent
stability of kinetochore–microtubule attachments in metaphase.
CENP-E motor function is required for stabilization of kinetochore–microtubule
attachment in anaphase
To assess whether regulation of CENP-E motor function by its stalk influenced the ability of
kinetochores to track and maintain attachment with depolymerizing microtubules ends, we arrested
cells rescued with full-length or Bonsai CENP-E in mitosis in the presence of an inhibitor
(S-trityl-l-cysteine [STLC]) of the kinesin motor Eg5 (Figure 4A). This treatment induces monopolar spindles with chromosome
rosettes and favors establishment of attachment of their kinetochores to the ends of microtubules
(Figure 4, B and C, no depolymerization). The cells were then
cooled for 20 min to induce depolymerization of nonstabilized microtubules. In monopolar cells,
however, this treatment also induced shortening of kinetochore microtubules and resulted in
tightening of chromosome rosettes due to poleward chromosome motion (Gudimchuk ). Cells rescued with Bonsai CENP-E had
significantly more unattached chromosomes at the periphery of the chromosome rosettes than cells
with full-length CENP-E (outlying unattached chromosomes; Figure 4, B
and C, 20 min depolymerization).
FIGURE 4
Reduced stability of kinetochore–microtubule attachment in anaphase in cells expressing
Bonsai CENP-E. (A) Schematic of the cell plating, RNA interference treatment, and drug treatment for
the microtubule destabilization assay. (B) Schematic of the microtubule destabilization assay to
test kinetochore attachments. The schematic also presents the outcome of the experiment. (C)
Representative image of cells rescued with full-length or Bonsai CENP-E, then tested for stability
of kinetochore attachments to depolymerizing microtubule ends as in B. Scale bar, 5 μm.
Right, percentage of cells with attached chromosomes without microtubule depolymerization and
percentage of cells with unattached outlying chromosomes after 20 min of microtubule
depolymerization. Error bars, SEM. **p < 0.01, p value of
a unpaired Student's t test realized on the mean of four (Full Length and Empty) or
three (Bonsai) independent experiments. For the 20 min depolymerization condition,
N = 98 cells were analyzed for full-length, 77 for Bonsai, and 97 for Empty
conditions. Anti–centromere antibody (ACA) was used to identify centromeres/kinetochores.
(D) Representative images from the time-lapse sequence of a cell with a lagging chromosome (yellow
arrowhead). Scale bar, 10 μm. Right, quantification of anaphase cells with lagging
chromosomes. Cells were depleted of endogenous CENP-E and rescued with full-length or Bonsai CENP-E
or not rescued (Empty); *p < 0.05, p value of a unpaired
Student's t test realized on the mean of three independent experiments.
N = 130 cells were analyzed for full-length, 58 for Bonsai, and 97 for Empty
conditions.
Reduced stability of kinetochore–microtubule attachment in anaphase in cells expressing
Bonsai CENP-E. (A) Schematic of the cell plating, RNA interference treatment, and drug treatment for
the microtubule destabilization assay. (B) Schematic of the microtubule destabilization assay to
test kinetochore attachments. The schematic also presents the outcome of the experiment. (C)
Representative image of cells rescued with full-length or Bonsai CENP-E, then tested for stability
of kinetochore attachments to depolymerizing microtubule ends as in B. Scale bar, 5 μm.
Right, percentage of cells with attached chromosomes without microtubule depolymerization and
percentage of cells with unattached outlying chromosomes after 20 min of microtubule
depolymerization. Error bars, SEM. **p < 0.01, p value of
a unpaired Student's t test realized on the mean of four (Full Length and Empty) or
three (Bonsai) independent experiments. For the 20 min depolymerization condition,
N = 98 cells were analyzed for full-length, 77 for Bonsai, and 97 for Empty
conditions. Anti–centromere antibody (ACA) was used to identify centromeres/kinetochores.
(D) Representative images from the time-lapse sequence of a cell with a lagging chromosome (yellow
arrowhead). Scale bar, 10 μm. Right, quantification of anaphase cells with lagging
chromosomes. Cells were depleted of endogenous CENP-E and rescued with full-length or Bonsai CENP-E
or not rescued (Empty); *p < 0.05, p value of a unpaired
Student's t test realized on the mean of three independent experiments.
N = 130 cells were analyzed for full-length, 58 for Bonsai, and 97 for Empty
conditions.The necessity of fully functional CENP-E at kinetochores, with its ability to potentiate stable
end-on kinetochore–microtubule attachments, was then examined during an unperturbed mitosis.
Chromosome motions during anaphase were monitored by live-cell imaging in cells rescued with
full-length or Bonsai CENP-E. An increased proportion of cells with lagging chromosomes was observed
in cells with Bonsai CENP-E compared with full-length CENP-E (57 ± 10 vs. 25 ± 1%;
Figure 4D). Together, these results suggest that a fully
elongated CENP-E stalk is required to maintain stable contact between the kinetochore and
depolymerizing microtubule ends. Because of the reduced motor capacity observed for Bonsai CENP-E in
vitro (Figure 1 and Supplemental Figure S1), we propose that
the unstable kinetochore–microtubule interaction observed in cells expressing Bonsai CENP-E
lacking a fully elongated stalk could also be explained by its reduced motor capacity in vivo.
DISCUSSION
The elongated flexible stalk of CENP-E regulates its microtubule binding and motility
Analogous to what was proposed for kinesin 1 (Verhey and Hammond,
2009), previous work with CENP-E established that binding between the head and tail domains
of soluble CENP-E can inhibit its ATPase activity, with inhibition relieved by phosphorylation of
the CENP-E tail by mitotic kinases (Espeut
). Our work identifies two additional mechanisms that
are likely to contribute to the regulation of CENP-E activity in cells during mitotic progression.
First, similar to kinesins 1 and 3 (Blasius
; Yamada
), the activity of CENP-E, full length (Gudimchuk ) and Bonsai (this work),
increases in vitro when its tail is bound to a cargo. Thus, CENP-E binding to kinetochores is likely
to be required for activating this motor, ensuring that only the kinetochore-bound CENP-E molecules
actively interact with and move along microtubules. Second, our study implicated the CENP-E stalk in
regulating microtubule binding and motility of CENP-E. Indeed, in contrast to both full-length and
truncated CENP-E motors, soluble molecules of Bonsai CENP-E are strongly defective in microtubule
binding in vitro. This result implies that in the context of a full-length molecule the stalk acts
as a positive regulator of interactions between microtubules and both of the CENP-E's
microtubule-binding sites, one in its motor and a second in its tail.The absence of motility of soluble molecules of Bonsai CENP-E in vitro, despite supporting robust
motility in the gliding and bead assays, could in principle result from reduced dimerization of the
shortened stalk of CENP-E. We do not favor this possibility because even our shortest Bonsai
constructs have a fairly long region that is predicted to form a coiled coil, including a fragment
that has been shown to be sufficient for dimerization (Kim
). In addition, Bonsai CENP-E failed to bind
microtubules in the presence of AMP-PNP, whereas this nucleotide induces strong binding of both
dimeric and monomeric kinesin (Huang and Hackney, 1994; Huang ). Finally, our
fluorescence analysis of Bonsai CENP-E molecules demonstrates directly that soluble Bonsai can form
dimers, so the absence of either directed or diffusive motions of Bonsai CENP-E on microtubules
appears to result from strong intramolecular inhibition.The molecular mechanism of the stalk-mediated regulation of CENP-E microtubule-dependent activity
is not yet known, but this effect is likely to result from the unusual structural and biomechanical
properties of this coiled-coil domain. The motor domains of all kinesins share a significant
similarity, but there are some interesting differences in the properties of their dimerizing stalks
(Verhey and Hammond, 2009). The stalk of kinesin 1, for
example, is approximately three times shorter than that of CENP-E; perhaps more important, the
central portion of kinesin 1’s stalk is represented by a rigid coiled coil with a centrally
located hinge (Coy ;
Jeppesen and Hoerber, 2012). This hinge is highly flexible
and allows the stalk to fold completely, so that the tail domains bind back on to the heads,
promoting autoinhibition, which in turn can be down-regulated by kinesin's light chain (Wong and Rice, 2010; Kaan
). In contrast, the elongated stalk of CENP-E is
composed of a discontinuous coiled coil, which appears to be highly flexible (Kim ). The stalk may directly impinge on
the interactions between head and tail of CENP-E, causing repression of autoinhibition akin to the
action of the light chain of kinesin 1. In wild-type CENP-E the stalk appears to partially suppress
the intramolecular binding between the head and tail, thereby allowing each of these domains to
engage in binding to microtubules. We propose that shortening of the stalk reinforces the
head-to-tail interaction in CENP-E and strengthens autoinhibition of the motor's activity (Figure 5).
FIGURE 5
Model for the role of CENP-E stalk during mitotic progression. This schematic emphasizes a
proposed role of elongated CENP-E stalk during prometaphase in facilitating a microtubule capture by
the kinetochores of polar chromosomes, thereby helping to initiate chromosome congression. Our
experiments in vitro demonstrate that CENP-E coiled-coil stalk is a positive regulator of CENP-E
interactions with microtubules, which may explain why Bonsai CENP-E is not fully active in vivo and
induces marked reduction in the stability of kinetochore–microtubule attachments during both
metaphase and anaphase. See the text for an extended discussion of other possible molecular
mechanisms for the role of CENP-E stalk.
Model for the role of CENP-E stalk during mitotic progression. This schematic emphasizes a
proposed role of elongated CENP-E stalk during prometaphase in facilitating a microtubule capture by
the kinetochores of polar chromosomes, thereby helping to initiate chromosome congression. Our
experiments in vitro demonstrate that CENP-E coiled-coil stalk is a positive regulator of CENP-E
interactions with microtubules, which may explain why Bonsai CENP-E is not fully active in vivo and
induces marked reduction in the stability of kinetochore–microtubule attachments during both
metaphase and anaphase. See the text for an extended discussion of other possible molecular
mechanisms for the role of CENP-E stalk.Our hypothesis of a negative role of the CENP-E stalk in autoinhibition explains why the binding
of soluble Bonsai molecules to microtubules is inhibited more significantly than seen for the
full-length CENP-E molecules and why cargo-free Bonsai CENP-E supports neither directed motility
(motor head mediated) nor diffusive motion (tail mediated). The role of CENP-E stalk in mediating
the intramolecular interactions is also supported by the lack of microtubule-binding activity of
Bonsai CENP-E even in the presence of AMPPNP, implying that the ATP-binding site of soluble Bonsai
CENP-E is blocked. Full-length CENP-E, however, is induced to bind strongly to microtubules by this
nonhydrolyzable ATP analogue (Figure 1G). Of interest, when the
C-terminal GFP at the tail of CENP-E is conjugated via antibodies to the surface of either a bead or
a coverslip, Bonsai CENP-E can bind and walk on microtubules, but still with reduced capabilities.
This result suggests that effect of the stalk configuration is less pronounced with cargo-bound
versus free CENP-E tail. Finally, the reduced speed of motility with Bonsai CENP-E in multiple motor
assays (such as microtubule gliding) can also be attributed to a fraction of inhibited molecules
present under these experimental conditions.
Mechanisms of CENP-E–mediated stabilization of kinetochore–microtubule
attachments
Our experiments in cells demonstrate that shortening the CENP-E stalk causes a severe reduction
in its cellular functions. Although Bonsai CENP-E is recruited robustly to the mitotic kinetochores
and exhibits normal enrichment at the kinetochores of pole-proximal chromosomes, in virtually all
functional assays this shortened motor produces phenotypes that are similar to or even stronger than
those seen with full CENP-E depletion. Indeed, lack of the congression of pole-proximal chromosomes
during prometaphase (Figure 2D), reduced stability of
kinetochore–microtubule attachments in metaphase (Figure
3), and presence of lagging chromosomes in anaphase (Figure
4) strongly suggest that CENP-E stalk is required for normal CENP-E functioning. These
results emphasize the important roles that CENP-E kinesin plays during different mitotic stages, but
they also raise a question about why these effects appear to be more severe than in the motility
assays in vitro. Indeed, whereas purified Bonsai motor maintains a fairly robust velocity of
microtubule gliding and microbead motions in vitro (Figure 1,
C–E), it fails to support congression of the poleward chromosomes in cells. Of
importance, using the CENP-E inhibitor GSK 923295, we confirmed that the kinetochore-bound Bonsai
CENP-E was able to engage in microtubule binding similar to that of full-length CENP-E,
demonstrating that the lack of normal mitotic functions of Bonsai CENP-E was not due to a complete
inhibition of its microtubule-binding activity.The rate of bead motions by Bonsai CENP-E in vitro is slower than that of full-length CENP-E, but
it seems unlikely that this alone could explain the strong perturbation of
kinetochore–microtubule interactions in cellular assays. Bonsai CENP-E motor may have some
other important biomechanical defect, which has not yet been revealed by our motility assays in
vitro, including reduced processivity of Bonsai CENP-E under a load. We also note that the in vitro
and in vivo situations differ in the location of GFP tags and the exact mode of cargo binding: in
vitro it takes place at a C-terminal tag, whereas Bonsai CENP-E is bound to its chromosomal cargo
via the kinetochore-binding site, which is located upstream from the microtubule-binding site (Figure 1B). It has also been suggested that CENP-E function in vivo
requires the long reach that is provided by the extended CENP-E coiled coil (Kim ). This length may be important for
the capture of already established kinetochore microtubule bundles and efficient congression of
polar chromosomes in prometaphase, because a longer stalk could expand the range of microtubule
search and capture at each kinetochore early in mitosis (Figure
5, polar chromosomes). The elongated shape of CENP-E may also be important later in mitosis
when CENP-E facilitates maintenance and/or capture of new microtubules at the kinetochores of
already congressed chromosomes (Figure 5, aligned chromosomes).
Thus, a relatively active but short CENP-E motor may not be able to carry out its cellular functions
well.A lack of normal motor activity is expected to reduce the ability of CENP-E to track with dynamic
microtubule ends and stabilize end-on attachments, since microtubule tip tracking by CENP-E relies
in part on its active motor (Gudimchuk
). Indeed, we observed unstable chromosome alignment in
metaphase and segregation defects in anaphase in cells rescued with Bonsai CENP-E. We note, however,
that destabilization of the end-on kinetochore–microtubule attachments could also result
from impaired interaction between CENP-E and some other kinetochore protein(s), including PP1 and
Ndc80 (Kim ). If in
Bonsai CENP-E cells the BubR1 inhibition of Aurora B is reduced (Guo
), this could also lead to indirect destabilization of
kinetochore microtubule attachment via enhanced Ndc80 phosphorylation. Finally,
kinetochore–microtubule attachment defects in cells with Bonsai CENP-E can result from a
lack of normal functioning of CENP-E–associated proteins that are required for the stability
of kinetochore–microtubule attachments, such as CLASPs (Maffini ; Maia
) and SKAP (Huang
). These possibilities are not mutually exclusive;
future work is needed to dissect the mechanism(s) of action of the unusually elongated stalk of
CENP-E.
Concluding remarks
We provide several lines of evidence that cells expressing CENP-E with a shortened coiled-coil
stalk have aberrant kinetochore–microtubule attachments, which lead to defects in chromosome
congression during prometaphase, unstable chromosome biorientation in metaphase, and the presence of
lagging chromosomes in anaphase. These results highlight the importance of elongated CENP-E kinesin
in facilitating kinetochore–microtubule attachments during all mitotic stages, not just in
prometaphase. Our work provides new mechanistic insights into the functions of a protein,
perturbations of which had been linked to chromosome segregation errors, aneuploidy, and the
development of tumors (Putkey ; Weaver ;
Silk ). Our findings
could help in understanding the in vivo effects of the drugs that have been developed to target
these functions (Ding ;
Wood ).
MATERIALS AND METHODs
Cell culture and cell imaging
Cells were maintained at 37°C with 5% CO2 in DMEM containing 10%
tetracycline-free fetal bovine serum (Clontech, Moutain View, CA), 100 U/ml penicillin, 100 U/ml
streptomycin, and 2 mM l-glutamine. The CENP-E rescue experiment was performed using the
humanCENP-E constructs cloned in a pcDNA5/FRT/TO vector (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA), generated as
described in Kim et al., 2010. Doxycycline was used at 1 mg/ml to induce GFP-CENP-E expression in
DLD-1 cells. For siRNA treatment, Flp-In TRex-DLD-1 H2B-RFP cells were used as described (Kim ). Cells were fixed and
immunostained, and the images were collected at 0.2 μm z-sections with a
60×/1.42 PlanApo oil objective using a DeltaVision Core system (Applied Precision, Issaquah,
WA) with CoolSNAP camera (Roper, Sarasota, FL). Images were deconvolved with SoftWoRx (Applied
Precision), and maximum-intensity two-dimensional projections were assembled using FIJI (ImageJ;
National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD).
Antibody and immunofluorescence
Cells were processed for immunofluorescence 48 h after siRNA treatment by fixing in 4%
formaldehyde in MTSB (100 mM 1,4-piperazinediethanesulfonic acid [PIPES], pH 6.8, 0.1% Triton X-100,
0.1 mM CaCl2, 1 mM MgCl2), blocked overnight at 4°C in 2.5% fetal
bovine serum, 0.2 M glycine, and 0.1% Triton X-100 in phosphate-buffered saline, followed by 1 h
antibody incubation. CENP-E antibody HpX-1, anti-tubulin antibody DM1A (T9026; Sigma-Aldrich, St.
Louis, MO), and anti–CENP-A antibody (13939; Abcam, Cambridge, MA) were used at 1:1000 and
anti–centromere antibody ACA (15-234-0001; Antibodies Incorporated, Davis, CA) at 1:500.
Cells were mounted in ProLong Gold (Invitrogen). Monopolar spindles were formed with 5 μM
STLC for 2 h and 20 μM MG132 to prevent mitotic exit; GSK-923295 was used at 200 nM. To
induce microtubule disassembly in cells with monopolar spindle, cells were treated for 20 min with a
combination of 3.3 μM nocodazole and cold by incubating on a slurry of ice and water.Microtubule signal was quantified by measuring the total pixel intensity of a 20-pixel-wide area
along the spindle axis using FIJI, and local background was subtracted.
Live-cell imaging
DLD-1 cells expressing histone H2B–monomeric red fluorescent protein were seeded 24 h
before experiment on Nunc LabTek II chambered coverglasses (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA).
CO2-independent medium (Life Technologies) was added, and the cells were imaged at
37°C for up to 2 h at 5 min intervals using a DeltaVision Core system.
Protein purification
Tubulin was purified from cow brains by thermal cycling and chromatography, then labeled with
rhodamine or Hilyte647. Kinesin 1 GFP construct K560 was purified as in Case ). Xenopus laevis
Truncated CENP-E labeled with GFP was expressed and purified from Escherichia coli
as in Kim . X.
laevis full-length CENP-E was expressed and purified from High Five cells (Invitrogen;
(Abrieu ). X.
laevis Bonsai CENP-E was expressed in High Five cells. The cells were lysed using
sonication in PK100 buffer (80 mM K PIPES, pH 6.8, 200 mM KCl, 20 mM imidazole, 0.5 mM ethylene
glycol tetraacetic acid [EGTA], 1 mM MgCl2, 0.1 mM MgATP, 1 mM dithiothreitol [DTT],
protease inhibitors). The latter were prepared from one Complete EDTA-free protease inhibitor
cocktail tablet (11 873 580 001; Roche, Basel, Switzerland) and phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 0.2
mM. Cell lysate was spun 30 min at 15,000 rpm (Sorvall SA-600; Thermo Scientific). The supernatant
was incubated for 1 h at 4°C with nickel-nitriloacetic acid beads and eluted using elution
buffer (40 mM K-PIPES, pH 6.8, 80 mM KCl, 300 mM imidazole, 0.5 mM EGTA, 1 mM MgCl2, 1 mM
DTT, 0.1 mM MgATP). Peak fractions were collected, diluted 1:4 with HiTrap Q stabilizing buffer (20
mM K-PIPES, pH 6.8, 40 mM KCl, 1 mM MgCl2, 0.5 mM EGTA, 1 mM DTT, 0.1 mM MgATP), and
loaded into a HiTrap Q 1 ml column. Proteins were eluted using a 0.1–1 M KCl gradient in
HiTrap Q elution buffer (25 mM K-PIPES, pH 6.8, 5 mM MgCl2, 0.5 mM EGTA, 1 mM DTT, 0.1 mM
ATP). Peak fractions were snap frozen after addition of 20% sucrose.
Work with CENP-E proteins in vitro
Microtubule gliding and single-molecule motility assays were carried out with a Nikon Eclipse
Ti-E inverted microscope equipped with 100×/1.49 NA TIRF oil objective, Perfect Focus
system, and TIRF Quad cube with emission wheels run with NIS-Elements Software. The temperature of
the objective was kept at 32°C with a heater (Bioptechs, Butler, PA). The epifluorescence
was excited with a 488 nm laser to visualize GFP and rhodamine and a 640 nm laser to visualize
microtubules labeled with Hilyte647. Motility chambers were prepared with a glass slide,
double-stick tape, and silanized 22 × 22 mm coverslips, as in Volkov
et al. (2014). For experiments with soluble CENP-E, Taxol-stabilized,
rhodamine-labeled microtubules were attached to coverslips with anti-tubulin antibodies (Serotec),
the surface was blocked with Pluronic-F127, and GFP-labeled proteins (0.5–3 nM) were imaged
in the motility buffer composed of BRB80 (80 mM K-PIPES, 1 mM MgCl2, 1 mM EGTA, pH 6.9)
with 4 mg/ml bovineserum albumin (BSA), 2 mM DTT, 2 mM Mg-ATP, 7.5–10 μM Taxol, 6
mg/ml glucose, 68 μg/ml catalase, 0.1 mg/ml glucose oxidase, and 0.5%
β-mercaptoethanol. Images were acquired with an Andor EMCCD at 100 ms/frame for each
channel, and rhodamine and GFP signals were separated with emission filters. The number of GFP
molecules in fluorescent dots for data in Supplemental Figure S1G was determined as in Gudimchuk ). To visualize
photobleaching steps, fluorescence curves were filtered with a Chung–Kennedy filter that
preserves stepwise transitions (Chung and Kennedy, 1991), and
the number of visual steps was counted (Supplemental Figure S1, H and I). Bonsai Ndc80-GFP protein,
which is monomeric (Ciferri ), and processive kinesin 1 proteins were used as controls.For microtubule-gliding assay, coverslips were coated with layers of biotin-BSA (22.5
μM), NeutrAvidin (25 μM), and biotinylated anti-GFP antibody (10–100 nM;
Abcam) and then blocked with Pluronic F127 (1%) and another layer of biotin-BSA (22.5 μM) or
biotin-PEG (100 μM; Quanta Biodesign, Plain City, OH). CENP-E proteins were added at
15–600 nM for 30 min to create coatings that were similar in density for different protein
constructs, as judged by GFP brightness. After removal of the unbound protein, Taxol-stabilized,
Hilyte647-labeled microtubules were imaged in the same motility buffer as before, except that
β-mercaptoethanol was replaced with 10 mM DTT. Images were acquired once per second with
100- to 300 ms exposure and analyzed using ImageJ. Motility of CENP-E–coated beads was
examined using instruments and procedures described in Gudimchuk
). Fluorescence-based microtubule-pelleting assay was
carried out as in Gudimchuk ). Briefly, CENP-E proteins (6 nM) were incubated with increasing concentration of
microtubules and 2 mM AMPPNP for 15 min at 32°C, microtubules were pelleted, and the
concentration of unbound CENP-E was quantified by GFP fluorescence of the supernatants.
Authors: Tarun M Kapoor; Michael A Lampson; Polla Hergert; Lisa Cameron; Daniela Cimini; E D Salmon; Bruce F McEwen; Alexey Khodjakov Journal: Science Date: 2006-01-20 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Claudio Ciferri; Jennifer De Luca; Silvia Monzani; Karin J Ferrari; Dejan Ristic; Claire Wyman; Holger Stark; John Kilmartin; Edward D Salmon; Andrea Musacchio Journal: J Biol Chem Date: 2005-06-16 Impact factor: 5.157
Authors: Beth A A Weaver; Alain D Silk; Cristina Montagna; Pascal Verdier-Pinard; Don W Cleveland Journal: Cancer Cell Date: 2006-12-28 Impact factor: 31.743
Authors: Hasan Yardimci; Marilyn van Duffelen; Yinghui Mao; Steven S Rosenfeld; Paul R Selvin Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2008-04-21 Impact factor: 11.205