Literature DB >> 24919887

Desogestrel versus danazol as preoperative treatment for hysteroscopic surgery: a prospective, randomized evaluation.

Antonio Simone Laganà1, Vittorio Palmara, Roberta Granese, Leonarda Ciancimino, Benito Chiofalo, Onofrio Triolo.   

Abstract

The aim of this single-center, prospective, randomized, parallel-group study was to compare desogestrel and danazol as preoperative endometrial preparation for hysteroscopic surgery. We enrolled 200 consecutive eligible patients, in reproductive age, with endouterine diseases. Pre- and post-treatment characterization of endometrium was performed by hysteroscopic visual observation and histologic confirmation. The enrolled patients were randomly assigned to two groups: 100 were treated with 75 μg of desogestrel/die, 100 with 100 mg of danazol/die, both orally for 5 weeks, starting on Day 1 of menstruation. We recorded intraoperative data (cervical dilatation time, operative time, infusion volume and severity of bleeding) and drugs' side effects. Post-treatment comparison of endometrial patterns showed a significant more marked effect of desogestrel, respect to danazol, in atrophying endometrium ("normotrophic non-responders" versus "hypotrophic"-"atrophic", p = 0.031). Intraoperative data showed no significant differences between the two groups for cervical dilatation time (p = 0.160), while in the desogestrel group we found a significant reduction of operative time (p = 0.020), infusion volume (p = 0.012), and severity of bleeding (p = 0.004). Moreover, desogestrel caused less side effects (p = 0.031). According to our data analysis, desogestrel showed most marked effect in inducing endometrial atrophy, allowed a better intraoperative management and caused less side effects during treatment.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Danazol; desogestrel; hysteroscopic surgery; preoperative treatment; side effects

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24919887     DOI: 10.3109/09513590.2014.929658

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gynecol Endocrinol        ISSN: 0951-3590            Impact factor:   2.260


  5 in total

Review 1.  Fertility sparing surgery for stage IA type I and G2 endometrial cancer in reproductive-aged patients: evidence-based approach and future perspectives.

Authors:  Salvatore Giovanni Vitale; Diego Rossetti; Alessandro Tropea; Antonio Biondi; Antonio Simone Laganà
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2017-02-10

2.  The Impact of Spinal Anesthesia and Use of Oxytocin on Fluid Absorption in Patients Undergoing Operative Hysteroscopy: Results from a Prospective Controlled Study.

Authors:  Naser Al-Husban; Abdelkarim Aloweidi; Omar Ababneh
Journal:  Int J Womens Health       Date:  2020-05-06

Review 3.  Fertility-Sparing Approach in Women Affected by Stage I and Low-Grade Endometrial Carcinoma: An Updated Overview.

Authors:  Giuseppe Gullo; Andrea Etrusco; Gaspare Cucinella; Antonino Perino; Vito Chiantera; Antonio Simone Laganà; Rossella Tomaiuolo; Amerigo Vitagliano; Pierluigi Giampaolino; Marco Noventa; Alessandra Andrisani; Giovanni Buzzaccarini
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-10-31       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 4.  Management of Cesarean Scar Pregnancy: A Single-Institution Retrospective Review.

Authors:  P Giampaolino; N De Rosa; I Morra; A Bertrando; A Di Spiezio Sardo; B Zizolfi; C Ferrara; L Della Corte; G Bifulco
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2018-03-05       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 5.  Fertility preservation in endometrial cancer patients: options, challenges and perspectives.

Authors:  Milan Terzic; Melanie Norton; Sanja Terzic; Gauri Bapayeva; Gulzhanat Aimagambetova
Journal:  Ecancermedicalscience       Date:  2020-05-06
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.