Literature DB >> 24919354

Evaluating training methods for facial image comparison: the face shape strategy does not work.

Alice Towler, David White, Richard I Kemp.   

Abstract

Human performance on unfamiliar face matching is known to be highly error prone. However, in organisations where staff are required to perform this task as part of their daily work, attempts are often made to mitigate risk by providing training. Importantly, the methods used in these training courses have not been subjected to empirical validation. In this study we evaluate a common component of many training programmes which encourages viewers to classify face shape. Our results show very low agreement in face shape classification, both within and between participants, and across repeated presentations of a single image to a single participant. Furthermore, face shape classification training did not improve face matching accuracy, suggesting that the face shape strategy does not facilitate identification.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24919354     DOI: 10.1068/p7676

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perception        ISSN: 0301-0066            Impact factor:   1.490


  12 in total

1.  Passport officers' errors in face matching.

Authors:  David White; Richard I Kemp; Rob Jenkins; Michael Matheson; A Mike Burton
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-08-18       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Error Rates in Users of Automatic Face Recognition Software.

Authors:  David White; James D Dunn; Alexandra C Schmid; Richard I Kemp
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-10-14       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Feature-by-feature comparison and holistic processing in unfamiliar face matching.

Authors:  Ahmed M Megreya
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2018-02-26       Impact factor: 2.984

4.  Super-recognisers in Action: Evidence from Face-matching and Face Memory Tasks.

Authors:  Anna K Bobak; Peter J B Hancock; Sarah Bate
Journal:  Appl Cogn Psychol       Date:  2015-10-20

5.  Use-inspired basic research on individual differences in face identification: implications for criminal investigation and security.

Authors:  Karen Lander; Vicki Bruce; Markus Bindemann
Journal:  Cogn Res Princ Implic       Date:  2018-06-27

6.  Do professional facial image comparison training courses work?

Authors:  Alice Towler; Richard I Kemp; A Mike Burton; James D Dunn; Tanya Wayne; Reuben Moreton; David White
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-02-13       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  The performance of practitioners conducting facial comparisons on images of children across age.

Authors:  Dana Michalski; Rebecca Heyer; Carolyn Semmler
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-11-19       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Solving the Border Control Problem: Evidence of Enhanced Face Matching in Individuals with Extraordinary Face Recognition Skills.

Authors:  Anna Katarzyna Bobak; Andrew James Dowsett; Sarah Bate
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-02-01       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Individual differences in hyper-realistic mask detection.

Authors:  Jet G Sanders; Rob Jenkins
Journal:  Cogn Res Princ Implic       Date:  2018-06-27

10.  Surgical face masks impair human face matching performance for familiar and unfamiliar faces.

Authors:  Daniel J Carragher; Peter J B Hancock
Journal:  Cogn Res Princ Implic       Date:  2020-11-19
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.