| Literature DB >> 24919131 |
Mingxue Liu1, Faqin Dong2, Wu Kang3, Shiyong Sun4, Hongfu Wei5, Wei Zhang6, Xiaoqin Nie7, Yuting Guo8, Ting Huang9, Yuanyuan Liu10.
Abstract
Algae biosorption is an ideal wastewater treatment method when coupled with algae growth and biosorption. The adsorption and bioaccumulation of strontium from simulated nuclear wastewater by Scenedesmus spinosus were investigated in this research. One hundred mL of cultured S. spinosus cells with a dry weight of 1.0 mg in simulated nuclear wastewater were used to analyze the effects on S. spinosus cell growth as well as the adsorption and bioaccumulation characters under conditions of 25 ± 1 °C with approximately 3,000 lux illumination. The results showed that S. spinosus had a highly selective biosorption capacity for strontium, with a maximum bioremoval ratio of 76%. The adsorbed strontium ion on cell walls was approximately 90% of the total adsorbed amount; the bioaccumulation in the cytoplasm varied by approximately 10%. The adsorption quantity could be described with an equilibrium isotherm. The pseudo-second-order kinetic model suggested that adsorption was the rate-limiting step of the biosorption process. A new bioaccumulation model with three parameters was proposed and could give a good fit with the experiment data. The results suggested that S. spinosus may be a potential biosorbent for the treatment of nuclear wastewater in culture conditions.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24919131 PMCID: PMC4078568 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph110606099
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
The simulated low and intermediate level radioactive liquid waste components.
| Elements | Nitrates | Contents/g∙L−1 |
|---|---|---|
| Na | NaNO3 | 31.560 |
| Al | Al(NO3)3 | 13.670 |
| Fe | Fe(NO3)3 | 7.460 |
| Cr | Cr(NO3)2 | 0.960 |
| Ni | Ni(NO3)2 | 2.670 |
| K | KNO3 | 0.620 |
| Ba | Ba(NO3)2 | 0.014 |
| Sr | Sr(NO3)2 | 0–0.1 |
| Cs | CsNO3 | 0.175 |
Figure 1The effect of simulated wastewater on S. spinosus growth during the biosorption phase (S. spinosus cell dried weight per 10 mL of culture medium).
Figure 2(a) The bioremoval ratio of strontium ions from a simple solution containing single strontiumions by S. spinosus under batch culture conditions; (b) The bioremoval ratio of strontium ions from simulated wastewater by S. spinosus under batch culture conditions.
Figure 3(a) The packing arrangement figure of the co-existing cation bioremoval ratio (R); (b) The packing arrangement figure of adsorbed cation quantity per 10 mL (q); (c) The total adsorbed cation quantity per 10 mL (q).
Figure 4(a) The adsorption of strontium ions by S. spinosus cells from simulated wastewater (qpas-t); (b) The bioaccumulation of strontium ions by S. spinosus cells from simulated wastewater (qact-t).
The equilibrium isotherm model parameters.
| Model | Time (h) | Linear Isotherm Regression | Nonlinear Isotherm Regression | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Parameters |
|
| Parameters |
|
| |||||
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
| Langmuir | 24 | 2.35627 | 0.06618 | 0.9531 | 0.8864 | 7.65490 | 0.01374 | 0.9262 | 0.1902 | |
| 48 | 2.34082 | 0.04904 | 0.9966 | 0.0594 | 4.52553 | 0.01758 | 0.9780 | 0.0498 | ||
| 96 | 2.62950 | 0.02242 | 0.9998 | 0.0019 | 2.44126 | 0.02518 | 0.9985 | 0.0018 | ||
| 144 | 2.50188 | 0.02127 | 0.9868 | 0.0597 | 2.89086 | 0.01908 | 0.9668 | 0.0413 | ||
| Freundlich |
|
|
|
| ||||||
| 24 | 1.29702 | 0.43837 | 0.9311 | 7.6716 | 0.85574 | 0.04543 | 0.9548 | 0.4544 | ||
| 48 | 1.39179 | 0.41849 | 0.9924 | 6.8841 | 1.35220 | 0.12624 | 0.9885 | 0.0160 | ||
| 96 | 1.25565 | 0.31886 | 0.9922 | 9.4048 | 1.43487 | 0.09741 | 0.9910 | 0.0156 | ||
| 144 | 1.16918 | 0.29145 | 0.9748 | 10.8071 | 1.32003 | 0.07969 | 0.9581 | 0.0556 | ||
| Koble-Corrigan |
|
|
| |||||||
| 24 | 0.03265 | −0.89004 | 0.02991 | 0.9721 | 0.0744 | |||||
| 48 | 0.16437 | −0.10717 | 0.45695 | 0.9928 | 0.0171 | |||||
| 96 | 0.05230 | 0.02496 | 1.08766 | 0.9988 | 0.0015 | |||||
| 144 | 0.02130 | 0.01346 | 1.47458 | 0.9719 | 0.0568 | |||||
The kinetic model parameters.
| Calculation Model | The Kinetics Model Parameters | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Based on scavenging ratio( |
|
|
|
| |
| 10 mg∙L−1 | 0.29345 | −0.17085 | −0.01471 | 0.9740 | |
| 50 mg∙L−1 | 1.45264 | −0.04289 | −0.09050 | 0.9831 | |
| 100 mg∙L−1 | 2.80110 | −0.02057 | −0.16139 | 0.9932 | |
| Based on |
|
|
|
| |
| 10 mg∙L−1 | 0.25839 | −0.26045 | −0.01739 | 0.4950 | |
| 50 mg∙L−1 | 1.04998 | −0.18523 | −0.20420 | 0.9759 | |
| 100 mg∙L−1 | 1.23870 | −0.04302 | −0.06600 | 0.9620 | |
| Based on |
|
|
|
| |
| 10 mg∙L−1 | 0.05534 | −0.69997 | −0.00214 | 0.3631 | |
| 50 mg∙L−1 | 0.77286 | −0.35743 | −0.21350 | 0.9937 | |
| 100 mg∙L−1 | 0.92618 | −0.05466 | −0.04688 | 0.9465 | |
Figure 5The dcact and dcact with calculated data for the bioaccumulation model.
The bioaccumulation model parameters.
| Parameter |
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10 mg∙L−1 | 5.5784 | −3.7626 | 0.0616 | 0.4936 | |
| 30 mg∙L−1 | 3.7022 | −7.1359 | 0.0243 | 0.7292 | |
| 50 mg∙L−1 | 2.8420 | −7.2902 | 0.0135 | 0.7628 | |
| 80 mg∙L−1 | 1.7891 | −5.9332 | 0.0109 | 0.9570 | |
| 100 mg∙L−1 | 1.4800 | −6.1437 | 0.0122 | 0.9316 | |