Literature DB >> 24919008

Is experimental data quality the limiting factor in predicting the aqueous solubility of druglike molecules?

David S Palmer1, John B O Mitchell.   

Abstract

We report the results of testing quantitative structure-property relationships (QSPR) that were trained upon the same druglike molecules but two different sets of solubility data: (i) data extracted from several different sources from the published literature, for which the experimental uncertainty is estimated to be 0.6-0.7 log S units (referred to mol/L); (ii) data measured by a single accurate experimental method (CheqSol), for which experimental uncertainty is typically <0.05 log S units. Contrary to what might be expected, the models derived from the CheqSol experimental data are not more accurate than those derived from the "noisy" literature data. The results suggest that, at the present time, it is the deficiency of QSPR methods (algorithms and/or descriptor sets), and not, as is commonly quoted, the uncertainty in the experimental measurements, which is the limiting factor in accurately predicting aqueous solubility for pharmaceutical molecules.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24919008     DOI: 10.1021/mp500103r

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Pharm        ISSN: 1543-8384            Impact factor:   4.939


  21 in total

1.  Partition coefficients for the SAMPL5 challenge using transfer free energies.

Authors:  Michael R Jones; Bernard R Brooks; Angela K Wilson
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2016-09-19       Impact factor: 3.686

2.  Multi-channel GCN ensembled machine learning model for molecular aqueous solubility prediction on a clean dataset.

Authors:  Chenglong Deng; Li Liang; Guomeng Xing; Yi Hua; Tao Lu; Yanmin Zhang; Yadong Chen; Haichun Liu
Journal:  Mol Divers       Date:  2022-06-23       Impact factor: 2.943

3.  Predicting the Drug Clearance Pathway with Structural Descriptors.

Authors:  Navid Kaboudi; Ali Shayanfar
Journal:  Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet       Date:  2022-02-11       Impact factor: 2.441

Review 4.  Simulation Models for Prediction of Bioavailability of Medicinal Drugs-the Interface Between Experiment and Computation.

Authors:  Mahmoud E Soliman; Adeniyi T Adewumi; Oluwole B Akawa; Temitayo I Subair; Felix O Okunlola; Oluwayimika E Akinsuku; Shahzeb Khan
Journal:  AAPS PharmSciTech       Date:  2022-03-15       Impact factor: 3.246

5.  Can human experts predict solubility better than computers?

Authors:  Samuel Boobier; Anne Osbourn; John B O Mitchell
Journal:  J Cheminform       Date:  2017-12-13       Impact factor: 8.489

Review 6.  Computational prediction of drug solubility in water-based systems: Qualitative and quantitative approaches used in the current drug discovery and development setting.

Authors:  Christel A S Bergström; Per Larsson
Journal:  Int J Pharm       Date:  2018-02-06       Impact factor: 5.875

7.  Intermolecular interaction as a direct measure of water solubility advantage of meloxicam cocrystalized with carboxylic acids.

Authors:  Piotr Cysewski
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2018-04-21       Impact factor: 1.810

8.  The influence of solid state information and descriptor selection on statistical models of temperature dependent aqueous solubility.

Authors:  Richard L Marchese Robinson; Kevin J Roberts; Elaine B Martin
Journal:  J Cheminform       Date:  2018-08-29       Impact factor: 5.514

9.  The development of models to predict melting and pyrolysis point data associated with several hundred thousand compounds mined from PATENTS.

Authors:  Igor V Tetko; Daniel M Lowe; Antony J Williams
Journal:  J Cheminform       Date:  2016-01-22       Impact factor: 5.514

10.  Challenges in the use of atomistic simulations to predict solubilities of drug-like molecules.

Authors:  Guilherme Duarte Ramos Matos; David L Mobley
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2018-05-31
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.