Alice G Cheng1, Emily C Oxford, Jenny Sauk, Deanna D Nguyen, Vijay Yajnik, Sonia Friedman, Ashwin N Ananthakrishnan. 1. *Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts; †Division of Gastroenterology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts; ‡Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts; and §Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Endoscopy, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Crohn's disease (CD) often affects women during the reproductive years. Although several studies have examined the impact of pregnancy on luminal disease, limited literature exists in those with perianal CD. Decision regarding mode of delivery is a unique challenge in such patients due to concerns regarding the effect of pelvic floor trauma during delivery on preexisting perianal involvement. METHODS: We performed a retrospective chart review of patients with CD with established perianal disease undergoing either vaginal delivery or caesarean section (C-section) at our institutions. We examined the occurrence of symptomatic perianal disease flares within 5 years after delivery in such women compared with nonpregnant CD controls. We also compared the occurrence of such flares between the 2 modes of delivery in women with established perianal CD. RESULTS: We identified 61 pregnant patients with CD with established perianal disease (11 vaginal delivery, 50 through C-section) and 61 nonpregnant CD controls with perianal disease. One-third of the C-sections were primarily for obstetric indications. Six of the vaginal deliveries were complicated. Approximately, 36% of cases had a symptomatic perianal flare within 1 year after delivery. This was similar across both modes of delivery (P = 0.53) and similar to nonpregnant patients with CD. There was no difference in the rates of perianal surgical intervention or luminal disease flares in our population based on mode of delivery or between pregnant patients with CD and nonpregnant CD controls. CONCLUSIONS: We observed no difference in risk of symptomatic perianal flares in patients with established perianal CD delivering vaginally or through C-section.
BACKGROUND:Crohn's disease (CD) often affects women during the reproductive years. Although several studies have examined the impact of pregnancy on luminal disease, limited literature exists in those with perianal CD. Decision regarding mode of delivery is a unique challenge in such patients due to concerns regarding the effect of pelvic floor trauma during delivery on preexisting perianal involvement. METHODS: We performed a retrospective chart review of patients with CD with established perianal disease undergoing either vaginal delivery or caesarean section (C-section) at our institutions. We examined the occurrence of symptomatic perianal disease flares within 5 years after delivery in such women compared with nonpregnant CD controls. We also compared the occurrence of such flares between the 2 modes of delivery in women with established perianal CD. RESULTS: We identified 61 pregnant patients with CD with established perianal disease (11 vaginal delivery, 50 through C-section) and 61 nonpregnant CD controls with perianal disease. One-third of the C-sections were primarily for obstetric indications. Six of the vaginal deliveries were complicated. Approximately, 36% of cases had a symptomatic perianal flare within 1 year after delivery. This was similar across both modes of delivery (P = 0.53) and similar to nonpregnant patients with CD. There was no difference in the rates of perianal surgical intervention or luminal disease flares in our population based on mode of delivery or between pregnant patients with CD and nonpregnant CD controls. CONCLUSIONS: We observed no difference in risk of symptomatic perianal flares in patients with established perianal CD delivering vaginally or through C-section.
Authors: David A Schwartz; Edward V Loftus; William J Tremaine; Remo Panaccione; W Scott Harmsen; Alan R Zinsmeister; William J Sandborn Journal: Gastroenterology Date: 2002-04 Impact factor: 22.682
Authors: R Caprilli; M A Gassull; J C Escher; G Moser; P Munkholm; A Forbes; D W Hommes; H Lochs; E Angelucci; A Cocco; B Vucelic; H Hildebrand; S Kolacek; L Riis; M Lukas; R de Franchis; M Hamilton; G Jantschek; P Michetti; C O'Morain; M M Anwar; J L Freitas; I A Mouzas; F Baert; R Mitchell; C J Hawkey Journal: Gut Date: 2006-03 Impact factor: 23.059
Authors: Uma Mahadevan; Salvatore Cucchiara; Jeffrey S Hyams; Flavio Steinwurz; F Nuti; Simon P L Travis; William J Sandborn; Jean-Frederio Colombel Journal: Am J Gastroenterol Date: 2010-12-14 Impact factor: 10.864
Authors: Kristin E Burke; Miriam J Haviland; Michele R Hacker; Scott A Shainker; Adam S Cheifetz Journal: Inflamm Bowel Dis Date: 2017-05 Impact factor: 5.325
Authors: Ashwin N Ananthakrishnan; Alice Cheng; Andrew Cagan; Tianxi Cai; Vivian S Gainer; Stanley Y Shaw; Susanne Churchill; Elizabeth W Karlson; Shawn N Murphy; Isaac Kohane; Katherine P Liao Journal: Dig Dis Sci Date: 2014-09-12 Impact factor: 3.199