Literature DB >> 24918300

Validation of a Video Analysis Software Package for Quantifying Movement Velocity in Resistance Exercises.

Borja Sañudo1, David Rueda, Borja Del Pozo-Cruz, Moisés de Hoyo, Luis Carrasco.   

Abstract

Sañudo, B, Rueda, D, del Pozo-Cruz, B, de Hoyo, M, and Carrasco, L. Validation of a video analysis software package for quantifying movement velocity in resistance exercises. J Strength Cond Res 30(10): 2934-2941, 2016-The aim of this study was to establish the validity of a video analysis software package in measuring mean propulsive velocity (MPV) and the maximal velocity during bench press. Twenty-one healthy males (21 ± 1 year) with weight training experience were recruited, and the MPV and the maximal velocity of the concentric phase (Vmax) were compared with a linear position transducer system during a standard bench press exercise. Participants performed a 1 repetition maximum test using the supine bench press exercise. The testing procedures involved the simultaneous assessment of bench press propulsive velocity using 2 kinematic (linear position transducer and semi-automated tracking software) systems. High Pearson's correlation coefficients for MPV and Vmax between both devices (r = 0.473 to 0.993) were observed. The intraclass correlation coefficients for barbell velocity data and the kinematic data obtained from video analysis were high (>0.79). In addition, the low coefficients of variation indicate that measurements had low variability. Finally, Bland-Altman plots with the limits of agreement of the MPV and Vmax with different loads showed a negative trend, which indicated that the video analysis had higher values than the linear transducer. In conclusion, this study has demonstrated that the software used for the video analysis was an easy to use and cost-effective tool with a very high degree of concurrent validity. This software can be used to evaluate changes in velocity of training load in resistance training, which may be important for the prescription and monitoring of training programmes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 24918300     DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000000563

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Strength Cond Res        ISSN: 1064-8011            Impact factor:   3.775


  5 in total

1.  The Validity and Reliability of Commercially Available Resistance Training Monitoring Devices: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Jonathon Weakley; Matthew Morrison; Amador García-Ramos; Rich Johnston; Lachlan James; Michael H Cole
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2021-01-21       Impact factor: 11.136

2.  Validity and reliability of the Kinovea program in obtaining angles and distances using coordinates in 4 perspectives.

Authors:  Albert Puig-Diví; Carles Escalona-Marfil; Josep Maria Padullés-Riu; Albert Busquets; Xavier Padullés-Chando; Daniel Marcos-Ruiz
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-06-05       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Validity of the iLOAD® app for resistance training monitoring.

Authors:  Evandro Claudino de Sá; André Ricarte Medeiros; André Santana Ferreira; Amador García Ramos; Danica Janicijevic; Daniel Boullosa
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2019-08-07       Impact factor: 2.984

4.  Agreement Between Kinovea Video Analysis and The Open Barbell System for Resistance Training Movement Outcomes.

Authors:  Joseph P Carzoli; Colby A Sousa; Eric R Helms; Michael C Zourdos
Journal:  J Hum Kinet       Date:  2022-02-10       Impact factor: 2.193

5.  Analysis of Wearable and Smartphone-Based Technologies for the Measurement of Barbell Velocity in Different Resistance Training Exercises.

Authors:  Carlos Balsalobre-Fernández; David Marchante; Eneko Baz-Valle; Iván Alonso-Molero; Sergio L Jiménez; Mario Muñóz-López
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2017-08-28       Impact factor: 4.566

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.