| Literature DB >> 24917932 |
Zhuo Chen1, Qin Liu1, Feng-Chao Jiao2, Bian-Li Xu3, Xiao-Nong Zhou1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Piroplasms are kinds of tick-borne parasitic apicomplexan protozoa, which are detrimental to humans and animals in tropical and subtropical areas around the world. Up until now, there has been a limited amount of reliable information available about the prevalence of piroplasms infections in wild animals in China. Therefore, we have investigated the infections of Babesia and Theileria species in both domestic and wild animals in Xinyang city, Henan province, where tick-borne diseases have recently been reported. This study aims to analyze the distribution patterns of piroplasms infections in animals, and assess their potential threat to humans in Central China.Entities:
Keywords: Babesia spp; China; Dogs; Hedgehogs; Sheep; Theileria spp
Year: 2014 PMID: 24917932 PMCID: PMC4051148 DOI: 10.1186/2049-9957-3-18
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Infect Dis Poverty ISSN: 2049-9957 Impact factor: 4.520
Figure 1The geographic map of sampling sites in Xinyang city of central China. (Sampling sites 1–4 located in Shihe District and sampling sites 5–8 located in Luoshan County).
Comparison of the differences in the positive rate of spp. in the sheep and the hedgehogs in the different locations
| Shihe | Hedgehogs | 51 | 19 | 37.25% | 1.97 | 1 | 1.00 | 0.1600 |
| Sheep | 53 | 27 | 50.94% | 1.37 (0.88–2.13) | ||||
| Luoshan | Hedgehogs | 101 | 2 | 1.98% | 73.71 | 1 | 1.00 | 0.0000 |
| Sheep | 20 | 15 | 75.00% | 37.88 (9.38–152.87) | ||||
| Total | Hedgehogs | 152 | 21 | 13.82% | 46.75 | 1 | 1.00 | 0.0000 |
| Sheep | 73 | 42 | 57.53% | 4.16 (2.67–6.49) |
DF = degrees of freedom; RR = risk ratio; CI = confidence interval.
Comparison of the differences in the positive rate of spp. in the sheep and hedgehog in Luoshan and Shihe
| Sheep | Luoshan | 20 | 15 | 75.00% | 3.44 | 1 | 1.00 | 0.0636 |
| Shihe | 53 | 27 | 50.94% | 0.68 (0.47–0.98) | ||||
| Hedgehogs | Luoshan | 101 | 2 | 1.98% | 35.41 | 1 | 1.00 | 0.0000 |
| Shihe | 51 | 19 | 37.25% | 18.81 (4.56–77.65) |
DF = degrees of freedom; RR = risk ratio; CI = confidence interval.
Figure 2Neighbor-joining tree showing the phylogenetic relationship of the 18S rRNA gene sequences of and species identified in this study and those present in the GenBank database. (The GenBank accession numbers are indicated in parentheses. Species detected in this study are indicated in bold. The scale bar represents nucleotide substitutions per position).
Nucleotide percent identity between the 18S rRNA of spp detected in this study
| 1 | KJ715184 | | | | | | |
| 2 | KJ715185 | 96.3 | | | | | |
| 3 | KJ715188 | 98.9 | 96.3 | | | | |
| 4 | KJ715189 | 98.9 | 96.0 | 98.9 | | | |
| 5 | KJ715191 | 98.6 | 95.4 | 98.9 | 98.3 | | |
| 6 | KJ715192 | 98.6 | 94.6 | 98.6 | 98.9 | 98.3 | |
| 7 | KJ715193 | 98.9 | 96.3 | 99.7 | 98.9 | 99.1 | 99.1 |