Amir Jamshid Khamoushi1, Fahimeh Kashfi2, Saeid Hosseini1, Ali Reza Alizadeh Ghavidel1, Niloufar Samiei1, Mehdi Haddadzadeh3. 1. Heart Valve Research Center, Shaheed Rajaei Cardiovascular Medical and Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Science, Tehran, Iran. 2. Heart Valve Research Center, Shaheed Rajaei Cardiovascular Medical and Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Science, Tehran, Iran ; Epidemiology and Reproductive Health Department, Royan Institute for Reproductive Biomedicine, ACECR, Tehran, Iran. 3. Cardiac Surgery Department, Afshar Hospital, Yazd, Iran.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Pregnancy is associated with a hypercoagulable state, therefore the optimal anticoagulants for potential use in pregnant women with prosthetic heart valves are controversial. The aim of this study is to investigate the effect of anticoagulants on pregnancy outcomes and their potential risks in pregnant women with mechanical heart valves. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this prospective cohort study, we followed 44 women with 49 pregnancies who had mechanical heart valves from September 2002 to September 2007. A total of 38 patients took warfarin throughout their pregnancies (group A). In 11 patients, warfarin was changed to heparin during the first trimester and then again to warfarin during 12thto 36thweeks of gestational age (group B). All women took warfarin from 36thweeks of gestational age until delivery. RESULTS: In group A, there were 22 live births (57.9%), 15 abortions (39.5%) and 1 maternal death (2.6%). In group B, there were seven live births (63.6%), three spontaneous abortions (27.3%) and one intra-uterine fetal death (9.1%). There was no significant difference in live birth rate between the two groups (p=0.24). Thirty-three pregnancies (86.8%) in group A and five pregnancies (45.4%) in group B had no maternal complications (p=0.004). The difference in pregnancy complications between both groups was significant (p<0.001). CONCLUSION: The present study shows that low dose warfarin (5 mg/day or less) may be safe during the first trimester of pregnancy. Maternal adverse events are low when pregnant women with mechanical heart valves remain on a warfarin regimen. The risk of embryopathy does not necessarily increase.
BACKGROUND: Pregnancy is associated with a hypercoagulable state, therefore the optimal anticoagulants for potential use in pregnant women with prosthetic heart valves are controversial. The aim of this study is to investigate the effect of anticoagulants on pregnancy outcomes and their potential risks in pregnant women with mechanical heart valves. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this prospective cohort study, we followed 44 women with 49 pregnancies who had mechanical heart valves from September 2002 to September 2007. A total of 38 patients took warfarin throughout their pregnancies (group A). In 11 patients, warfarin was changed to heparin during the first trimester and then again to warfarin during 12thto 36thweeks of gestational age (group B). All women took warfarin from 36thweeks of gestational age until delivery. RESULTS: In group A, there were 22 live births (57.9%), 15 abortions (39.5%) and 1 maternal death (2.6%). In group B, there were seven live births (63.6%), three spontaneous abortions (27.3%) and one intra-uterine fetal death (9.1%). There was no significant difference in live birth rate between the two groups (p=0.24). Thirty-three pregnancies (86.8%) in group A and five pregnancies (45.4%) in group B had no maternal complications (p=0.004). The difference in pregnancy complications between both groups was significant (p<0.001). CONCLUSION: The present study shows that low dose warfarin (5 mg/day or less) may be safe during the first trimester of pregnancy. Maternal adverse events are low when pregnant women with mechanical heart valves remain on a warfarin regimen. The risk of embryopathy does not necessarily increase.
In pregnant women with mechanical heart valves,
the frequency of valve thrombosis increases due to
pregnancy-related hyper-coagulability. Therefore,
effective anticoagulation is critical in these patients
during pregnancy. Despite numerous research, the
optimal anticoagulation therapy during pregnancy
remains a controversial issue in the field of obstetrics.
Warfarin and heparin can be used during
pregnancy as anticoagulants in pregnant women
with mechanical heart valves, however the potential
maternal and fetal side effects associated with
these medications pose challenges (1, 2).Warfarin provides effective protection against
thrombo-embolism, but its use in pregnancy is associated
with an augmented rate of abortion and
the risk of warfarin-induced embryopathy (3, 4).
Warfarin is a teratogenic risk because of its ability
to cross the placental barrier, particularly during
early gestational age (1). First trimester complications
of warfarin include: spontaneous abortion,
prematurity, fetal deformity, stillbirth, retro-placental
hemorrhage and intracranial hemorrhage.
Warfarinembryopathy consists of bone and cartilage
abnormalities, nasal hyperplasia, optic atrophy,
blindness, mental retardation and seizures (4). More recent reports on the dose dependent effects
of warfarin indicate safe administration during
pregnancy if adequate anticoagulation can be
achieved at doses of 5 mg or less (5, 6).Unfractionated heparin (UFH) provides an alternative
therapy that avoids fetal side effects; however,
the use of UFH is associated with increased maternal
thrombo-embolic and bleeding complications
(1, 7, 8).Low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) may be
more advantageous than UFH and appears a good
alternative (9), however scant information has
been published on the use of LMWH in pregnant
women with prosthetic heart valves (2).There are several studies documenting the impact
of mechanical heart valve replacement
and anticoagulation therapy on pregnancy outcomes
and risks, but most are retrospective. To
date, no prospective study has been performed
on Iranian women in this regard. Therefore, we
designed a prospective research study to determine
both maternal and fetal outcomes of pregnancy
in women with prosthetic heart valves
over a five year period in Rajaee Heart Hospital,
as one of the cardiac surgery referral centers
in Iran.
Materials and Methods
In this prospective study, 49 pregnancies in 44
women with prosthetic heart valves were followed
between 2002 and 2007 in the Department
of Cardiac Surgery, Rajaee Heart Hospital, Tehran,
Iran.The Ethics Committee of Rajaee Heart Hospital
approved this study. Participating patients signed
informed consent forms. All patients were visited
during the first trimester of their pregnancies. Pregnant
women referred during their second or third
trimesters were excluded from the study. Patients’
clinical and socioeconomic conditions determined
their anticoagulant regimens. When the patient refused
the recommended anticoagulation therapy,
an alternative regimen was started. Thus, we had
two study groups according to the anticoagulation
regimen. A total of 38 patients were on warfarin
(Orion Pharma, Finland) throughout their pregnancy
(group A). The remaining 11 patients (group B)
had iv injections of UFH (Rotex Medica, Germany)
during the first trimester (6th-12th week), after
which they received warfarin until the 36th week
of gestation followed by heparin for the last two
weeks of pregnancy. Both groups received heparin
at the time of delivery. During warfarin treatment,
the international normalized ratio (I.N.R.) was
checked routinely and kept between 2.0 to 3.5, as
needed. During heparin treatment, the activated
partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) was maintained
at twice the control level. All patients underwent
periodic transthoracic echocardiography
(TTE) in addition to transesophageal echocardiography
(TEE) when needed during the follow up
period. Pediatricians examined all newborns.Spontaneous abortion was defined as fetal loss
before 20 weeks of gestation. Fetal and maternal
outcomes were evaluated. Fetal outcomes included
abortion, live birth, intra uterine fetal death
(IUFD), preterm labor, embryopathy and type of
delivery; maternal outcomes included bleeding,
valvular thrombosis and maternal death.Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS
version 13 software. Continuous variables were
described as mean ± standard deviation (SD). Student’s
t-test compared continuous variables. The
Mann-Whitney rank-sum test compared medians
when the normality test failed. Noncontinuous
variables were compared by either the chi-square
test or Fisher's exact test, as appropriate. A p value
less than 0.05 was statistically significant.
Results
The mean age of studied women at time of pregnancy
was 29.8 ± 5.3 years (30.28 ± 5.2 in group A
and 28.09 ± 3.9 in group B). There were 36 pregnancies
in women with mitral valve replacement,
8 in women with aortic valve replacement and 5
in those with both aortic and mitral valve replacement
(Table 1). None of pregnancies were twins.
Five women became pregnant twice during the
study duration (2002-2007).
Table 1
Type of surgeries in both groups
Variable
Group A (warfarin)
Group B(heparin)
MVR
28 (73.7%)
8 (72.7%)
AVR
5 (13.2%)
3 (27.3%)
MVR and AVR
5 (13.2%)
-
MVR: Mitral valve replacement
AVR: Aortic valve replacement
Type of surgeries in both groupsMVR: Mitral valve replacementAVR: Aortic valve replacementOverall, 59% of pregnancies resulted in live
births while 36.7% aborted. As shown in table 2,
group A had 22 live births (57.9%), 15 abortions
(39.5%), 1 IUFD (2.6%) and a maternal death
due to acute thrombosis and prosthetic valve
dysfunction in the delivery room. In group B,
there were 7 live births (63.6%), 3 spontaneous
abortions (27.3%) and 1 IUFD (9.1%). Live birth
rates were similar between the two study groups
(p=0.24).There was no warfarinembryopathy in this study.
After birth, during long term follow up of mothers
and their babies, no obvious malformations were
found in the infants.Nine patients had vaginal delivery while cesarean
section was performed in 20 patients. Abnormal
post-partum hemorrhage was not seen in any woman.
Twenty out of 49 pregnancies (40.8%) resulted
in either abortion or IUFD. Despite the high rate of
abortion in studied women, particularly in group
A, we did not investigate the causes of spontaneous
abortion. Both groups A and B had one stillbirth
each (p=0.25).Three infants were born prematurely, two in group
A and one in group B.Overall the low birth weight rate was 21% in
our study (6 out of 29 cases). Although this rate
was higher in group A (23% versus 14%), however
this difference was not statistically significant
(p>0.05).Fetal outcome in 49 pregnanciesNVD: Normal vaginal deliveryCS: Cesarean sectionPrevalence of valve-related thrombosis and prosthetic
valve dysfunction (PVD) was significantly
higher in group B (45.4% versus 2.6%; p<0.001).
Valve-related complications were seen in 13.2% of
group A cases and 54.6% from group B (p=0.004;
Table 3).Maternal complications in 49 pregnanciesSix patients in the heparin group had valve thrombosis
and underwent additional surgery. Five of
the six had severe heart failure as a result of valve
thrombosis during the first trimester, while one
had thrombosis at the end of the third trimester and
underwent surgery during the postpartum period.
Only three (50%) of these pregnancies with valve
thrombosis in group B resulted in live births. In
group A, valve thrombosis occurred after delivary
in 2 patients (5.3%) among 4 patients with valve
thrombosis.Table 4 shows the pregnancy outcome according
to warfarin dosage. Most abortions occurred in the
warfarin group at doses greater than 5 mg daily
(p=0.016; Table 4).Pregnancy outcome according to warfarin dosage in group A
Discussion
The combination of heart disease and pregnancy
can present a challenge to the physician caring for
both the mother and fetus (10). Pregnancy after
mechanical heart valve replacement requires strict
control of coagulation. Special attention should
be paid to the occurrence of complications during
anticoagulation therapy (11). The risk of thromboembolism,
miscarriage and premature birth seems
to be higher in patients with prosthetic heart valves
that require anticoagulation (4).Warfarin crosses the placental barrier and its use
by the mother may result in an increased incidence
of fetal mortality and morbidity. Treatment with
this agent during pregnancy is associated with a
high spontaneous abortion rate that ranges between
16.2% and 44% (4, 12).The use of heparin presents an attractive alternative
to warfarin because it does not cross the placenta
(13).In the present study, the overall abortion rate was
39.5% in the warfarin group of which 15.8% were
therapeutic abortions. The heparin group had more
spontaneous abortions (27.3%) compared to the
warfarin group (23.7%), although this difference
was not significant. This finding contrasted studies
by Nassar et al. (8), Geelani et al. (14), Cotrufo
et al. (15) and Al-lawati et al. (16) who noted
more spontaneous abortions in the warfarin group,
although only Nassar et al. (8) found this difference
to be significant. Our result was consistent
with Akhtar et al. (17) although in our study the
increased abortion rate in the heparin group was
not significant, whereas Akhtar et al. showed a
significantly higher spontaneous abortion rate in
the heparin group. Salazar and colleagues have
reported a 37.5% incidence of abortions in a series
of patients treated with subcutaneous heparin
during the first trimester of pregnancy. These high
abortion rates in both groups could be explained
by placental hemorrhage, which may occur during
effective anticoagulation with either warfarin or
heparin (13).The rate of healthy babies born by these mothers
was 57.9% in group A and 63.6% in group B,
which is similar to results reported by Nassar et al.
(8) and Kim et al. (18).In this study, there was no warfarin-induced fetal
malformation, and is similar to other studies by
Vural et al. (19), Geelani et al. (14) and Al lawati
et al. (16). It can be suggested that the teratogenic
effects of warfarin during the first trimester may
be overstimated, therefore the effects of switching
to heparin must be studied further with additional
larger studies.In the present study, thromboembolic complications
were significantly more frequent in the
heparin group (45.4%) compared to the warfarin
group (2.6%; p=0. 001). Although the live birth rate
was higher in the heparin group, the use of heparin
resulted in a higher spontaneous abortion rate. It
seems the use of subcutaneous UFH during pregnancy
raises the concern of an increased incidence
of maternal risk in the form of valve thrombosis
without any significant reduction in the incidence
of spontaneous abortion compared with warfarin
(2, 13). We found significantly more valve thrombosis
and second surgeries in the heparin group.
Another challenging issue in this regard is the dose
of warfarin used in pregnant women with mechanical
heart valves. In the present study, warfarin at
doses over 5 mg daily resulted in a significantly
higher abortion rate and lowered live birth rate. The
only woman who expired in the warfarin group was
treated with a low dose of warfarin. In a previous
study in our center, Khamooshi et al. have shown
that warfarin is an effective anticoagulant in pregnant
women with mechanical valves, but it results
in significant fetal loss at doses over 5 mg daily
(20). Vitale and colleagues have shown a close relationship
between fetal complications and warfarin
dosage (5, 6). We previously described a case report
regarding the safety of low dose warfarin during
pregnancy in a woman with two mechanical heart
valves who became pregnant by the intracytoplasmic
sperm injection (ICSI) method (21).Cotrufo and colleagues described the outcomes
of 71 pregnancies in women with mechanical
valve prostheses who were anticoagulated with
warfarin for the entire duration of their pregnancies.
Although there were no maternal deaths, or
thromboembolic or hemorrhagic complications,
the rates of miscarriage (32%), stillbirth (7%) and
embryopathy (6%) increased (15). It seemed the
risk of complications was higher when the mean
daily dose of warfarin exceeded 5 mg (15, 20).One of present study’s limitations is the relatively
low sample size that prevented reaching a definite
conclusion.
Conclusion
It can be suggested that if patients on warfarin
switch to heparin no embryopathy occurs, however
there would be a risk of maternal complications.
In addition, this study confirms previous studies
that low dose warfarin (≤5 mg/day) during pregnancy
is almost safe, with minimal feto-maternal
complications. Additional prospective multicentric
studies with more cases are recomended.
Table 2
Fetal outcome in 49 pregnancies
Pregnancy outcome
Group A (warfarin)n=38
Group B(heparin)n=11
P value
Abortion
15 (39.5%)
3 (27.3%)
0.35
Spontaneous
9 (23.7%)
3 (27.3%)
Therapeutic
Live births
22 (57.9%)
7 (63.6%)
0.5
NVD
7 (18.4%)
2 (18.2%)
CS
15 (39.5%)
5 (45.5%)
IUFD
1 (2.6%)
1 (9.1%)
0.4
NVD: Normal vaginal delivery
CS: Cesarean section
Table 3
Maternal complications in 49 pregnancies
Variable
Group A(warfarin)n=38
Group B(heparin)n=11
P value
No complications
33 (86.8%)
5 (45.4%)
0.004
Maternal death
1 (2.6%)
-
0.77
Prosthetic valve dysfunction in first trimester
1 (2.6%)
5 (45.4%)
0.001
Prosthetic valve dysfunction in third trimester or after delivery
3 (7.9%)
1 (9.2%)
0.65
Table 4
Pregnancy outcome according to warfarin dosage in group A
Authors: P Sareli; M J England; M R Berk; R H Marcus; M Epstein; J Driscoll; T Meyer; J McIntyre; C van Gelderen Journal: Am J Cardiol Date: 1989-06-15 Impact factor: 2.778
Authors: Amir J Khamooshi; Fahimeh Kashfi; Saeed Hoseini; Mohammad B Tabatabaei; Hossein Javadpour; Fereydoon Noohi Journal: Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann Date: 2007-12
Authors: Zachary L Steinberg; Clara P Dominguez-Islas; Catherine M Otto; Karen K Stout; Eric V Krieger Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2017-06-06 Impact factor: 24.094