| Literature DB >> 24917921 |
Hazhir Khoram1, Alireza Najafpour1, Mazdak Razi2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Currently, chemotherapy and radiotherapy are considered most effective methods for cancer treatment, however these strategies often result in fertility problems. A favorable alternative to prevent fertility loss in cancer patients is the cryopreservation and transplantation of sexual tissues (ovaries and/or testes). There is a low rate of fertilization following cryopreservation of ovaries prior to implantation. Therefore, in our opinion, this low rate is caused by instable blood flow during organ transplantation. Thus, this study researches a canine ovarian model that focuses on direct exposure of ovaries with blood in an experimentally induced sinus-like cavity. We implanted this tissue on the muscular layer of the stomach, which is its most vascularized region.Entities:
Keywords: Canine; Ovarian; Sexual Hormone; Transplantation
Year: 2011 PMID: 24917921 PMCID: PMC4040240
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Fertil Steril ISSN: 2008-0778
Comparisons of <100 and 101-200 µm follicular oocyte damage between control-sham T1 and T3 groups
| Groups | 100 µm intact follicles (%) | Cytoplasmdamage (%) | Nucleus damage (%) | Cytoplasm &nucleus damage (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 98.09 ± 1.43 | 11.8 ± 1.30 | 1.95 ± 0.61 | 1.48 ± 0.39 | |
| 78.17 ± 1.32* | 14.6 ± 1.67* | 2.79 ± 0.14*a | 1.92 ± 0.16 | |
| 81.60 ± 2.07* | 14.4 ± 1.14* | 2.08 ± 0.05*a’ | 1.89± 0.23 | |
| 98.80 ± 1.64 | 7.00 ± 0.81 | 1.22 ± 0.43 | 0.77 ± 0.52 | |
| 79.75 ± 2.06*b | 11.25 ± 0.95*c | 2.55 ± 0.32*d | 1.67 ± 0.45*e | |
| 83.87 ± 0.95*b’ | 8.75 ± 0.50*c’ | 2.02 ± 0.05*d’ | 1.16 ± 0.21e’ | |
Stars indicate significant differences (p≤0.05) between T1 and T3 animals with control-sham in the same column.
Different letters and superscripts in the same column indicate significant differences (p≤0.05) between T1 and T3 animals. All data are presented as mean ± SD
Fig 2Mean percentage of cytoplasmic damage (C.D), nuclear damage (N.D) and combined cytoplasmic+nuclear damage of granulosa cells. Stars indicate significant differences (p≤0.05) between T1 and T3 groups with the control-sham group. There are no statistically significant differences (p≥0.05) between T1 and T3 animals. All data are presented as mean ± SD.
Histological assessment of ovarian medulla and cortex arteries and veins endothelial bloating (EB), hypertrophy (EH) and degeneration (ED) in control-sham, T1 and T3 groups.
| Ovaries | Medullar artery | Medullar vei | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BD | EH | BE | BD | EH | BE | ||
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 12.33 ± 1.03 | 10.50 ± 1.04* | 9.61 ± 0.49 | 8.75 ± 1.25 | 8.25 ± 0.95* | 8.00 ± 0.81 | ||
| 11.50 ± 1.37 | 9.11 ± 0.77* | 9.81 ± 1.00 | 8.10 ± 1.52 | 8.12 ± 0.77* | 7.63 ± 0.44 | ||
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 8.78 ± 0.42 | 6.39 ± 0.57 | 6.00 ± 0.63 | 5.37 ± 0.62 | 5.60 ± 0.61* | 4.21 ± 0.49 | ||
| 8.38±0.48 | 6.09±0.79 | 5.16±0.98 | 4.95±0.60 | 5.18±0.76 * | 4.26±0.60 | ||
Stars indicate significant differences (p≤0.05) between data in the same column. All data are presented as mean±SD.
Fig 3Histological architecture from the transplanted ovary. A. Low magnification. Note the dark brown sites (arrow heads) close to the recovered blood vessels showing newly organized endothelial cells in order to generate new blood vessels. B. High magnification from outer medulla of the transplanted ovary. Note the dark brown stained endothelial cells aggregated abundantly close to light brown stained cells showing recovered endothelial cells (arrows). C. High magnification from inner medulla, dark brown stained endothelial cells (arrow heads) located adjacent to the endothelial cells with heterogeneous cytoplasm (arrows), endothelial cell staining (A, ×100; B and C, ×400).
Fig 4Histological comparison of normal arterioles and veins in the medullar and cortical regions of the ovaries in T1 and T3 animals. Data are presented in percent (%). Note: N.M.A, normal medullar arteriole; N.C.A, normal cortical arteriole; N.M.V, normal medullar vein and N.C.V, normal cortical vein. There were no significant differences (p≥0.05) between data evaluated for T1 and T3. All values are presented as mean ± SD.